The Libel of Review, as you read in the Instruction set at the bottom is for the purpose of providing an evidence repository for Refusals for Cause. There is no sense trying to teach attorneys in black robes about law and history; they paid college tuition for that already. The important thing to focus on in the body of the LoR is the example Clerk Instruction. That explains the entire lesson plan and leaves the other text fluff - for the objective of getting an evidence repository in the "exclusive original cognizance" of the United States government, which was formed to protect your property rights.
The LoR was first developed by a friend of mine and some of his "friends", whom I never met in a book called Are You Lost at C? I have a full copy of the book, which about 2/3 is attachments and may eventually get that on my scanner for you all.
The initial precept is the same precept in my rendition of the LoR. The federal judiciary operates fundamentally in admiralty. This is because the several compact states at the time of the Judiciary Act where the 'saving to suitors' clause is found were independent republican nations. The US government was formed as liaison between them as a municipal city of Washington, District (not state) of Columbia. Then in 1790 the districts overlaid on the states were assigned to handle the debts of the United States government.
Therefore any causes arising from the US government's Fed (FRNs) are an insurance policy awaiting claim (bottomry) and take on the nature of an admiralty claim - Delovio v. Boit (1815). The diversity may be between the man/woman and the trustee/fiduciary for IT in all upper case letters (CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST) or the same thing in different terms, if you know your true name - the man/woman and the contractor with the Fed (endorsement of private credit).
Regards,
David Merrill.