It would "seem" to be different but in fact it is exactly the same. Fractals of the Holographic image. What is within will be without and a carnal people will select a man king. That is the way of being. Thusly the Woman riding the back of the Beast can now be completely understood. And she wears a Red Dress.Originally Posted by shikamaru
This is exactly akin to being led by the Red Horse. Just turn the dial a bit and look towards the East - whereof rides the White Horse. Of course these are mere symbols but I think the symbols say more than language.
The forms of being are in fact Corporate for the body of which I occupy within has many members each to a different task. How many billions of cells busy about their daily work - governed by a higher power - of which I take no thought. Are these cells somehow non-existent because they are named? I think not.
Considering a body that is bruised and oozing with unbound wounds:
It seems today that the woman and Man [follow previous analogy in Statehood] are divorced. Therefore, we see the leadership being understood in Insurance Policies. The more claims against the Insurance Policy understanding the deeds of a de-facto Judge, then the higher the premiums. One day will come when said Judge will have to make a decision to practice absent insurance and in full liability upon his/her own estate or quit.
Moses throw down your staff [and it turned into a Serpent] and ate up the "staffs" of the magi in Pharaoh's court.
Would to God that all officers of State obtained their identity in God. For in Him, we move, we live and have our being. I recognize whereof their power to operate is derived - it is in liability. Thusly properly framing the argument - the judge is not holding a vacant office - that is absurd. It is his court and he is running his court as any other business is run. But since the people are okay with this due to their lack of opposition - they consent and agree.
You may say I am not okay with consenting to a judge who is not bonded to the people. But then the judge will ask - whereof are these people [wife] you speak? As far as I can tell all I see is corporate office holders who by their very nature are in debt - understanding and without contest to the war and other debts incurred and existing of State. Is this not the DEATH STAR of the Movie Star Wars - all male and without feminine presence? Concerning the people you speak thereof - the debtor is slave to the lender.
Many feel mis-understood as they do not understand central banking - nevertheless obtaining benefits of State [society]. So how will the status quo change? In class action - whereof a Moral Person [group of like minded people] petition the higher power Supreme Court for change. Reminds me of the letter that the defensive team of the 1985 Chicago Bears wrote to George Halas asking him not to fire their defensive coach. Halas walked down to the field telling all the coaches to leave and holding up the letter proclaimed "this is the proudest day of my professional life." Saying "you asked for it, and now you are gonna get your wish." This is Romans 13.
I see a cess-pool of commercial activity and I comprehend what understands commerce - Insurance. For the Ship of State is understood in Bottomry of the Keel. Said Judge is running his court in the name of State understood by and Insurance Policy. Is the justice better or worse - I leave that decision to you. Banking of the United States is the Rich Man of State - enter FDIC to insure transactions domestically within. Gold and Silver understands the Rich Man's commerce.
If a Man at Law is charged, then the Charge must be discharged upon the Man's Estate. I see children at limited liability discharging charges in minus money understood by Insurance Companies operating under the Law of State - Incorporations of State - to handle transactions/charges domestically within the House of the Rich Man.
My use of the terms "little children" and "Man" are not derogatory or demeaning upon the mind - rather it is a statement concerning liability. A Man is not to say male vs. female but rather one who has full liability and thus an established Estate in the Earth. In other words, Peter with both feet washed has identity in Jesus. Thusly the enlightened Man is the 6th day creation of God in the "beast of the field" which is to say the regenerated carnal natural being into a Regenerated Man of God. Thusly is Jesus called the Son of Man.
Best Regards,
MJ
Reply With Quote