suggestions and insight by senior members on the W-4 form

[Binbokusai Yagyuu]

I wrote in "Exempt" at line number 7. t.

I do not like that " exempt " verbage, but rather " not subject to " there is quite a bit of difference there

[David Merrill]

I am a little saddened that the experience has taught you that.

[Treefarmer]

I am a little saddened that the experience has taught you that.

Why?
It seems that you learned this a long time ago.
I'm just now catching up

[martin earl]

Just a thought, maybe redeemed lawful money is 'taxable' (meaning there is an obligation to pay tax on it). The only thing that makes sense to me right now is this: the obligation to pay any tax or obligation once demand for redemption is made remains with the issuer of the note who created the obligation ab initio.

The endorsers of FRNs (or fractionalized credit/currency) are obliged to pay any taxes on it so long as I restrict my endorsements properly.

EDIT TO ADD: I personally believe there are fees owed, after all, Federal Reserve Credit is issued to be paid at face value in goods and services, plus interest, only endorsers of that agreement (contract) may be obligated to pay in goods and services.

[allodial]

Re: Victoria GRANT and Canada's debt what's interesting is that "Canada" means "the Village" or "the City". Do you live in the City?

Just a thought, maybe redeemed lawful money is 'taxable' (meaning there is an obligation to pay tax on it). The only thing that makes sense to me right now is this: the obligation to pay any tax or obligation once demand for redemption is made remains with the issuer of the note who created the obligation ab initio.

The endorsers of FRNs (or fractionalized credit/currency) are obliged to pay any taxes on it so long as I restrict my endorsements properly.

EDIT TO ADD: I personally believe there are fees owed, after all, Federal Reserve Credit is issued to be paid at face value in goods and services, plus interest, only endorsers of that agreement (contract) may be obligated to pay in goods and services.

Or perhaps it has something to do with tax on cancellation of debt if you endorse it in blank?

[David Merrill]

I compiled some images about Social Security.

[Axe]

Well there it is in black and white from the SSA itself.

"The Social Security Act does not require a person to have a social security number to live and work in the United States, nor does it require an SSn simply for the purpose of having one."

They go on to use circular reasoning by citing "other laws" that
require businesses who are required to file with the IRS, without
stating what those requirements are.

Pretty evasive, in a clever sort of way...