In Process: US Passport as American (not US citizen)

[David Merrill]

Interesting. Customs denotes a port authority doesn't it? Which in my opinion further supports the purpose of a proper ID. If refuge can be had with that ID then can it protect you from a corrupt court with an "ACTING" judge? I ask for my own knowledge. I understand what xparte is saying though.

Yes indeed, I believe that to be true for Trump but, if I interperate the information correctly on the bankruptcy resolving, then shouldn't the DC form of government be de-solved? The president is just the administrator of the bankruptcy correct? His seat should no longer exist.

I think that your point eluded me.

You are saying that the CEO of the "old" US lost his job as a member of The Board, during the bankruptcy?

I do not believe that is true at all. With real persons going through a personal bankruptcy, they do not dissolve the personage. And many times if things are not going as well as or better than the Business Plan projected, a CEO can simply dissolve the corporation, restructure and pick up with new capital under a new name. Donald John himself has put the DONALD TRUMP through four personal bankruptcies or so I hear on Internet rumor. One thing that amazes me is how the man most think is President has earned billions in collusion with the Russians upon the human frailty of addiction, chiefly to gambling but all the other receptors are present within the casino empires this one man has built.

So I think that the unusual thing about this bankruptcy would be how Congress played its deceptive role, and never even mentioned raising the debt ceiling, not that I was really paying much attention. But this same Congress is playing ignorant that the artificial person, the United States has not bothered changing its name. So legally I feel that Congress would be required to pass a bill excluding the US from that requirement - to open after restructure under a different name like corporations do.

I do not watch such things close enough to speak with certainty. And I certainly understand how inconvenient it would be to change the name of the United States. But it seems to be a discrepancy in the traditions of trust law.

[DTBA]

I think that your point eluded me.

You are saying that the CEO of the "old" US lost his job as a member of The Board, during the bankruptcy?

I do not believe that is true at all. With real persons going through a personal bankruptcy, they do not dissolve the personage. And many times if things are not going as well as or better than the Business Plan projected, a CEO can simply dissolve the corporation, restructure and pick up with new capital under a new name. Donald John himself has put the DONALD TRUMP through four personal bankruptcies or so I hear on Internet rumor. One thing that amazes me is how the man most think is President has earned billions in collusion with the Russians upon the human frailty of addiction, chiefly to gambling but all the other receptors are present within the casino empires this one man has built.

So I think that the unusual thing about this bankruptcy would be how Congress played its deceptive role, and never even mentioned raising the debt ceiling, not that I was really paying much attention. But this same Congress is playing ignorant that the artificial person, the United States has not bothered changing its name. So legally I feel that Congress would be required to pass a bill excluding the US from that requirement - to open after restructure under a different name like corporations do.

I do not watch such things close enough to speak with certainty. And I certainly understand how inconvenient it would be to change the name of the United States. But it seems to be a discrepancy in the traditions of trust law.

I'm sorry for taking so long to respond. Life sorta happened is the best way to describe it. I had to read the posts again to realign my thoughts to the point I was trying to get at. I was only referring to the seat of government itself. Not the actual person. From my thoughts, if the international bankruptcy mandate of 70 years is over, then the debt should have been forgiven. DC should have been shut down, then restructured or reformed for other purposes for the people because it no longer operates under bankruptcy. Also, the Birth Certificate system should have been dissolved with it as well correct? DC was incorporated to allow it to operate in commerce which Congress controls. I view it as they're personal shield of protection IMO.