Is everyone assumed to know who "the informer" is and that what he says is truth? or that we were assumed to be alive in the time George Washington was alive?Originally Posted by shikamaru
At least I gave a specific resource to work from.
Is everyone assumed to know who "the informer" is and that what he says is truth? or that we were assumed to be alive in the time George Washington was alive?
At least I gave a specific resource to work from.
Those who are serious about researching this type of material know him quite well.
David knew who I was talking about.
Sarcastic questioning doesn't provide great cover for your ignorance.
I have already. You need to go to this thread: http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...wall-and-more-!!
You must have a short memory or something.
Last edited by shikamaru; 11-04-11 at 12:38 AM.
Really, i do not know the informer, never met and shook hands with him, never had a conversation with him so no I do not know him, it is just a voice on a audio file.
You should check out Part 1 again and take heed to what the man speaking is saying at the 11 min mark to the the 13 min. mark. It may prove to be more effective in your posts.
And that is called ignorance.
Glad you can admit it.
Admittance is the first step in rectification.
More effective than your sarcastic questions?
If this is going to turn into your usual session of derailment, save it for another thread. I'm speaking with David.
Last edited by shikamaru; 11-04-11 at 01:02 AM.
No, I am just specifically pointing out that instead of saying " according to the informer " or " the informer said this " you might come up with the actual document he is referencing instead of having to root and hog through all of his audio files. I do not get it, is the informer your god or something?
No, he's yours. Didn't you know that?
Can you prove it?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote