Results 1 to 10 of 174

Thread: Pete HENDRICKSON's Lost Horizons - Solutions?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by JHV View Post
    The Lesson Plan is:

    1) learn your true identity I checked, my parents did not lie to me. I don't plan on changing my name this late in life.
    2) become proficient at Record-Forming-I'll work on that.
    3) redeem lawful money- Will do.
    It is of course a good thing to check. I trust your parents were not offended by you checking.

    It may be that upon a cursory glance you have still not discerned your true identity residing in your true name. Look very carefully at these Black's Fifth definitions:



    Do you see how "name" in a legal/law dictionary is in quotation marks. This convention means it is a special use of the term. - Like in Private Use. Or maybe better "private use".



    That definition compiles the story. Legal name is the same things as "name" within the same dictionary! In other words the lawyer/attorney will upon dictionary examination come away with the impression that Name and Legal Name are synonyms.

    So for use in the Lesson Plan true name and true identity mean Given or Christian Name or Names; the First and Middle names only. Do not reject your family heritage; I certainly do not being a Patroon. There is no denying that I have a perpetual inheritance (Section VI). And unless you understand the superior court of public record and notice for a non-statutory abatement for misnomer, this is a silly thing to bring up in any inferior jurisdiction. However knowing who you are is fundamental in understanding the basic trust structure put in place to affect endorsement at large among the supporters of government debt called the US Dollar (implemented 1933). This is expecially important since the world considers the US Dollar the Reserve Currency of the World.


    Regards,

    David Merrill.


    P.S. I just noticed the serendipity of keeping "Naked" in the image for "Name"! When you sign the backside of a paycheck that is obviously a "naked" contract agreement by signature. I believe I will write some verbiage about Naked Contract into the Libel of Review template. It certainly supports the idea that without consideration the entire government bonds scheme is completely without enforcement power, as if I had been informed in good faith I would have redeemed lawful money since my first paycheck ever!
    Last edited by David Merrill; 04-09-12 at 09:32 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •