Results 1 to 10 of 159

Thread: Usufruct Surrender Remedy

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Joseph View Post
    The "duty" isn't voided; it's transferred to the one who acts as if the duty belongs to him/her. When we make adverse claims of already seized interests, we are labeled as "enemies of the State" and we obligate ourselves to fulfill the "duty" which would otherwise be the obligation of the actual usufructuary - the State.

    If you wish, go to peace and surrender the 'usufruct'; surrender adverse claims to that which has been already seized and that which amounts to nothing more but mere "earthly/worldly treasures" and illusionary "profits" derived therefrom. If one makes clear declaration that one is without TITLE and/or OWNERSHIP claim(s) over already seized and vested interests of the 'United States', how can one be held lawfully liable for obligations and duties pertaining to said interests?

    Any 'use' of persons in commerce benefits the State; we receive NOTHING of intrinsic value in return for our labor. Debt currency and credit provides only discharge and people get "paid" by way of said debt obligations - debt is not fair and just compensation for one's labor.

    Stop acting like an OWNER and let the actors for the State administrate its own liabilities from within its own created realm.

    Or, be an OWNER and take the burden on for yourself; this is what most people are doing anyway.
    The use of the word "surrender" implies that you must be Owner of something in some respect in order to "surrender" it.

    Why else would they even be sending you a "bill"?

    Boris uses "naked owner" to describe why they are approaching you for the "NAME".

    In Trust, and in military seizure, ownership has been split into legal and equitable title.

    The State seized (by pledge or military conquest) LEGAL title only.

    The COLB is evidence of equitable title (indemnification), which title you are holding now when you appear to be alive on the record (via UCC-1 or other county record).

    This equitable title is the 'reversionary interest" that re-vests to you upon your "appearance to be alive", and this equitable title is what you indeed "surrender" to State, which then now holds BOTH Legal and Equitable Titles, causing the usufruct to end (page 407, point II "Merger") and distinguishing the associated debt by operation of law (12 USC 95a(2).

    IMO, this is how I see Boris's technology working...
    Last edited by doug555; 04-27-14 at 07:19 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •