Silence. I am watching the mail. I suspect they rejected it and mailed it back at me. Often this is just a clerk instructing me how to get it filed correctly according to the rules of the court.
Since it was a notice of claim though, and they took five days - three business days holding up filed cases over it I believe I can consider it served.
any news...?
I am glad you show interest.
I would like to catch you all up on this topic, maybe a little later today. You will see why I want to delay a little.
P.S. I hear a rumor about a "court order". Without seeing it, my best guess is how strongly this testifies to having an evidence repository. This latest "filing" was not published on PACER yet I am showing it on the Internet. The CIT refuses to publish my filing on PACER. So I cannot show it??
I have shown you proper service of process on the CIT.
Last edited by David Merrill; 06-21-16 at 09:12 PM.
Welcome!
Old folks? I am only half-way through this temporal life.
Well? Anything about that "court order" rumor? Bated breath here...
Thanks for staying on it.
Here is what came back; no publication on PACER, no Case #. But they returned a Copy - not the Original so I consider it filed, or properly served NOTICE.
Attachment 4174
Since this is collection of testimony, I find it rewarding that they stopped publishing cases for five days (including the weekend) while they considered how to handle my matter. That shows careful contemplation.
Last edited by David Merrill; 06-23-16 at 10:38 PM.
Did you noticed the signature? Who in particular made the decision your claim/complaint did not fall under the court's jurisdiction. I am not trying to be obtuse, but it is interesting how they chose to deny your claim.
Originally Posted by Gavilan
That is how the LORD works all right.
Last edited by David Merrill; 06-24-16 at 03:31 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote