Results 1 to 10 of 163

Thread: Redemption of Lawful Money at US Bank

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by allodial View Post
    FYI, just for clarification on a side note: the account at the SSA is separate from the account at the IRS. A connection between the SSN and the IRS is made by filing a W4, filing a 1040..things like that. It could be that a "social security account number" and a "social security number" might be different enough to warrant attention to detail.
    I was thinking about this the other day.

    The SSN is to identify an account and while it is never to be used for identification purposes the IRS calls it a Taxpayer Identification Number.


    Quote Originally Posted by freedave View Post
    OK, how does this look?

    Deposited for credit on account #XXXXXXX
    to be redeemed in lawful money by demand
    USCA12 section 411
    John Doe (signed)
    You are still talking about the check to the broker? I told you I have little experience with that. But it looks like a good demand; like you understand many aspects of paychecks that have been pointed out on this site.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    The SSN is to identify an account and while it is never to be used for identification purposes the IRS calls it a Taxpayer Identification Number.
    Yep. AFAIK the IRS does not 'see' "social security accounts numbers" they 'see' "tax ID numbers". My study of the IRS specifications for e-filing or the like revealed lack of any computational distinction between an "EIN" or an "SSN" entered on a form or into a database. Since a year or two such may have changed for some reason or another. The IRS, a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, does appear to maintain some kind of link between the IRS and SSA for verifying whether an SSAN exists. AFAIK, the IRS and the US Department of the Treasury are wholly separate from the U.S. Social Security Administration. While the digits of the SSAN might generally be the same as that of a US tax ID or account # established with the IRS, they are not at all the same accounts and there is no inherent link between the two accounts. The IRS account would likely never, ever exist if a SS-4, 1040, W2 or W4 was never filed.
    Last edited by allodial; 02-07-12 at 01:40 AM.
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    You are still talking about the check to the broker? I told you I have little experience with that. But it looks like a good demand; like you understand many aspects of paychecks that have been pointed out on this site.
    Yes, I am still talking about the check to the brokerage firm.

    Thank you, David, for your validation of my demand -- I think I may use it.
    Last edited by freedave; 02-08-12 at 03:13 AM.

  4. #4
    Is the validity of this remedy supported by anything more than the one sentence from the statute?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by freedave View Post
    Is the validity of this remedy supported by anything more than the one sentence from the statute?
    Yes. The 'saving to suitors' clause and structure of the districts on the states. If you choose to live in the fiction then that is your state - this state. It is all a state of mind anyway. We do not see a line between Colorado and Wyoming on the ground; only on the map. But you cannot grow a potato in a map!

    I explained it yesterday: Click Here. If you choose to accomodate the district and Fed then your endorsement of their existence under your feet, between you and the land suae potestate esse is published.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 02-10-12 at 03:04 PM.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Yes. The 'saving to suitors' clause and structure of the districts on the states. If you choose to live in the fiction then that is your state - this state. It is all a state of mind anyway. We do not see a line between Colorado and Wyoming on the ground; only on the map. But you cannot grow a potato in a map!

    I explained it yesterday: Click Here. If you choose to accomodate the district and Fed then your endorsement of their existence under your feet, between you and the land suae potestate esse is published.
    This is way beyond my familiarity with the subject.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by freedave View Post
    This is way beyond my familiarity with the subject.
    Then please try this.

    Validate the one sentence with its context.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Then please try this.

    Validate the one sentence with its context.
    I assume you mean, "Validate one sentence with its context."

    In a confusing text, I do normally try to do find one part I can understand enough to proceed forward.

    I am not able to do that in this case.

    I have found that in discussion groups similar to this one, there is not too high an importance on making the subject easily comprehensible.

    If the subject is valid, that is a very great underestimation of importance.

    I had hoped to give this a try on the check have been holding for two weeks...
    Last edited by freedave; 02-13-12 at 07:47 PM.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by freedave View Post
    This is way beyond my familiarity with the subject.
    http://admiralty.uslegal.com/saving-to-suitors-clause/

    DISTRICT. A certain portion of the country, separated from the rest for some special purposes. The United States are divided into judicial districts, in each of which is established a district court; they are also divided into election districts; collection districts, &c. (Source)
    ACCOMODATION, com. law. That which is done by one merchant or other person for the convenience of some other, by accepting or endorsing his paper, or by lending him his notes or bills.

    2. In general the parties who have drawn, endorsed or accepted bills or other commercial paper for the accommodation, of others, are, while in the hands of a holder who received them before they became due, other than the person for whom the accomodation was given, responsible as if they had received full value. Chit. Bills, 90; 91. See 4 Cranch, 141; 1 Ham. 413; 7 John. 361; 15 John. 355, 17 John. 176; 9 Wend. 170; 2 Whart. 344; 5 Wend. 566; 8 Wend. 437; 2 Hill, S. C. 362; 10 Conn. 308; 6 Munfd. 381. (Source)
    Hand-book of the Law of Bills and Notes

    Kinds of endorsement

    This getting deeper into several areas mainly American Admiralty/Maritime Law, negotiable instruments, and Lex Mercatoria.
    Last edited by shikamaru; 02-12-12 at 01:10 PM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Treefarmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    in the woods known to some as Tanasi
    Posts
    476
    Quote Originally Posted by shikamaru View Post
    http://admiralty.uslegal.com/saving-to-suitors-clause/





    Hand-book of the Law of Bills and Notes

    Kinds of endorsement

    This getting deeper into several areas mainly American Admiralty/Maritime Law, negotiable instruments, and Lex Mercatoria.
    Thank you shikamaru. That's interesting about the different endorsements.

    I'm sure the "Hand-book" is interesting too, but I easily fall asleep even without trying to read it.
    This is probably why most people would rather be enslaved than to have to read stuff like that in order to fight off the bankers and lawyers.
    Treefarmer

    There is power in the blood of Jesus

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •