Currently being denied my deposit with demand to redeem lawful money

[KnowLaw]

I believe that unless and until 12 USC 411 is somehow repealed or over-turned, this method properly executed will continue to yield success.

It cannot be over-turned except by the Congress in which it was first passed, which opportunity has long since passed by, and to attempt to repeal it would be a fraud upon the public. Otherwise, one or the other of these two actions would already have been accomplished. So the Congress is not going to (i.e. cannot) take either of those two actions.

If you understand law, then you understand the following (taken from a post on another forum, in referring to a similar question):

Does the State of Michigan have a right to abolish laws of the Territory of Michigan? Does the 14th Congress have a right to abolish the laws of the 13th Congress? Can the Boy Scouts modify the Girl Scouts Handbook? The answer is[:] ... only the entity that created a law can abolish or modify it. That is not to say a newer entity [i.e., iteration of government] cannot adopt laws of its own but at no time can they modify the original law.

Nope. A law passed is a law passed. Now I agree that the 14th Congress can choose to enact a NEW law that affects how their OWN employees are going to approach a problem.

A new congress is a new government. The laws of the old government are still in effect until a new congress changes or abolishes them FOR THEIR OWN EMPLOYEES. A new congress cannot create ex post facto a law that an employee of the previous congress relied upon for his own actions.

[itsmymoney]

Regarding the recording of my Demand to RILM Affidavit at the County tomorrow, I have acquired on the Affidavit the Notary's printed name and signature, plus the signatures of two witnesses. I intend to record under a Miscellaneous Filing and get TWO certified copies of the recording (plus request the Notary's Certificate of Commission - of which I got her personal copy today at the bank - to verify against the County's copy). The Affidavit states a retro RILM to Jan 2, 2015 which is the first RILM check for 2015. I have all the evidence to back this info up.

Also, should I give them the ORIGINAL (signed in blue ink) or the COPY (black ink) of the Affidavit, to record?

Any other thoughts are most welcome.

Thank you.

[Chex]

It cannot be over-turned except by the Congress in which it was first passed, which opportunity has long since passed by, and to attempt to repeal it would be a fraud upon the public. Otherwise, one or the other of these two actions would already have been accomplished. So the Congress is not going to (i.e. cannot) take either of those two actions. If you understand law, then you understand the following (taken from a post on another forum, in referring to a similar question):

That is a great statement something to keep an eye on.

Look the verbiage changed. LOL in all Cap letters by the way.

By the way the seller wants $2,149.00 for this bill

[mikecz]

So we are pretty much all on board that the new notes are dual purpose notes correct?

I found it interesting, at the bottom of this posted note, it says "Will pay the the bearer on demand... ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS" thereby making a distinction between this note, and an actual dollar.

On a one dollar bill I have sitting in front of me (series 2009), it says... ONE DOLLAR, at the bottom. This would mean, well, that it is an actual dollar, but also fit as a federal reserve note, it's really just how you claim it.

[Chex]

So we are pretty much all on board that the new notes are dual purpose notes correct?

Yes we are mike.

I found it interesting, at the bottom of this posted note, it says "Will pay the the bearer on demand... ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS" thereby making a distinction between this note, and an actual dollar.

"Will pay the the bearer on demand"... Humm wonder what someone else thinks of that term?

On a one dollar bill I have sitting in front of me (series 2009), it says... ONE DOLLAR, at the bottom. This would mean, well, that it is an actual dollar, but also fit as a federal reserve note, it's really just how you claim it.

Will Pay To The Bearer On Demand

Will pay the the bearer on demand Search