Is this thead a correct reflection of "the Process"?

[catskinner]

Hi David,
I started redeeming in lawful money, my payroll checks, with a new job I started the middle of January. I went to the driveup window at my bank,but the teller told me that I would have to come inside to cash it.The next teller I got was the commercial teller,she cashed it and wanted to know what I wanted back as far as notes. I told her 100s would do. The bank manager was standing behind her as she counted out the bills.
She flipped the check over and looked at it puzzled and asked me why I had endorsed it like that. I started to tell her about Title 12 sec 411 but didn't get the chance to say anything when the manager picked up the check and said "It is a restricted endorsement and it would be OK."
I was thrilled.
So it does work and I will continue demanding lawful money. My next challenge is to get a letter written to change my signature cards.
I am very interested in learning more about refusal for cause and libel of review.

Thanks Dave

[Axe]

The objective of utilizing the remedy that is written in the law is that a target not be painted on your back. The endorsement on the back of a paycheck is your agreement to do business with the Federal Reserve. If there is no agreement in place, then it is unlikely that there will be any sensical prosecution that arises.

Hi David,

I was more talking about starting one of these forums painting a target on your back.

Informational forums like these can be considered "media" and we all know what the first thing the communists do when they get control is.

I hear what you are saying about "doing nothing but following the legal process"... I get it, I really do, but when you have the white house coming out and openly proclaiming what laws they are going to enforce and what laws they will not, it gives me pause. A quote from Voltaire comes to mind.

"It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong. "

This is why the pioneers take the arrows.

[David Merrill]

Yes. That thread is about my first of two videos.

Welcome Axe! I am glad you found your way here. The Freemen forum opened up quickly and was popular immediately. A lot of folks enjoy this subject material - and everybody needs remedy.

The objective of utilizing the remedy that is written in the law is that a target not be painted on your back. The endorsement on the back of a paycheck is your agreement to do business with the Federal Reserve. If there is no agreement in place, then it is unlikely that there will be any sensical prosecution that arises.

People are finding that any Withholdings are fully Refunded based on the remedy being properly applied. If, They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand... is being incorrectly applied or interpreted here nobody is explaining why. On the SJC website the best sounding board was Shoonra the Useful.

Shoonra, Bernard J. SUSSMAN is a retired law librarian with a Bar Card (DC) since 1978. His attempts to explain that remedy from elastic currency does not actually exist really taught me a lot. Nobody of consequence agrees with him though.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[Axe]

I was going to put up a new forum myself this week if I hadn't found this one. Already had the domain name. Hopefully this one will last a while though.

[Axe]

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/fo...age1304915/pg1

Stumbled on it the other day when I was looking for where everyone might have gone from the other forum.

So this is the third forum, Ecclesia, SuiJuris, and SuiJurisClub... makes you wonder if running these forums paints a target on your back.