1st Return Redeeming Lawful Money

[Moxie]

Important Rabbit Trail:

This indicates David Merrill is dangerously correct and the malicious (banking) element has sent agents here to dissuade the public. Very encouraging! And the JohnnyCash example adds some weight with the matching "55" shown on the return.

Group question, not so much directed to StoneFree:

So how does one tell the difference between an "agent sent to dissuade" and an innocent student making comments or mistakes in their learning process?

And I wonder how many innocent people have been driven away from these forums in the midst of their studies, never to return, all because some assumed them to be an agent based on their questions and learning process/learning style. This is tragic. Even shameful.

What does it take for someone to prove they are not

[Mark Allan]

Froze, here is your explanation in full for the IRS. You may find some or all of it useful in your reply.
I am an American Citizen by being born within the territory of the Union States (jus soli), and born to parents who were also American Citizens (jus patria). As an American Citizen I have certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the ownership of property. Just because the United States of America Corporation (federal government) issued a transmitting utility for me (YOUR FULL NAME) for my use in participating in the public trust, I never voluntarily and knowingly surrendered any of my unalienable rights for a commercial contract (see eg, NCGS 25-1.308 of the UCC), a practice deplored by the United Nations International Covenant on Enforcement of Individual Civil Rights (the ICEICR, now adopted by 176 nations). And since citizenship is a First Amendment right, I chose this past tax year to keep some of the fruits of my labor, which cannot be taxed by the IRS, as the living man has an unalienable right to earn his living through his labor. The use of lawful money is a formal way to rebut the presumption that I have agreed to be a debt slave to the corporate government. Since lawful money is issued by the US Treasury more or less in accordance with the Constitution, it is outside the purview of the IRS, which can only collect a privilege tax on monies gifted to the public trust through the transmitting utility, with endorsement of Federal Reserve credit (sight notes of zero maturity), and thus dealing in private securities, being the privilege. There is nothing frivolous about asserting my rights to retain the fruits of my labor. After all, paying income taxes is voluntary, as is participation in the public trust, and thus volunteering to commit all my property and labor as surety for the onerous national debt.

Freed

Freed, I like it. While it doesnt look like froze will make a use, thanks for your input.

[froze25]

The letter has been mailed certified return receipt. I will update as it progresses.

[froze25]

The letter has been mailed via certified return receipt. I will update as it progresses.

[LearnTheLaw]

It appears that people are making posts to this thread, however I seem to be having trouble seeing the posts.

Am I the only one having this problem

[LearnTheLaw]

It appears that people are making posts to this thread, however I seem to be having trouble seeing the posts.

Am I the only one having this problem

[David Merrill]

It appears that people are making posts to this thread, however I seem to be having trouble seeing the posts.

Am I the only one having this problem

The technician replaced some corrupted files. So we should be okay now.

[LearnTheLaw]

the technician replaced some corrupted files. So we should be okay now.

thanks......

[froze25]

OK the letter is on its way. Screen Shots of Tracking attached

[froze25]

I am considering making Secretary of the Treasury Jacob J. Lew aware of my correspondence with the IRS agents working under him. My thinking is he is personally responsible for their actions and should be made aware of the situation. Thoughts?

[froze25]

OK, the IRS has received my correspondence. Screen shot below.

[JohnnyCash]

You're not fooling me, froze25. I have another 1st Return Redeeming Lawful Money success to show you all:

http://ctcwarrior.com/1040_Success.pdf

[David Merrill]

I am considering making Secretary of the Treasury Jacob J. Lew aware of my correspondence with the IRS agents working under him. My thinking is he is personally responsible for their actions and should be made aware of the situation. Thoughts?

If you are up for it, a Libel of Review is served on Jacob Joseph LEW.

[froze25]

You're not fooling me, froze25. I have another 1st Return Redeeming Lawful Money success to show you all:

http://ctcwarrior.com/1040_Success.pdf

The 1040 and W2 show wages of $20?7.35 no one lawful money reduction or not would pay income taxes on that amount. How does that show success? Who's fooling who here?

[froze25]

If you are up for it, a Libel of Review is served on Jacob Joseph LEW.

I was thinking more in the line of Informing him of the correspondence I'm engaged in with agents that he is responsible for while CC'ing my congressman's office of the same.