1st Return Redeeming Lawful Money

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chex
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 1032

    #136
    Originally posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    Would anyone argue that a house can be constructed absent a foundation? Usufruct is based in Rights.

    But what is Right? Right is Property.

    But Property begs a legal relationship and that begs a TRUST. So one cannot contemplate Usufruct without first contemplating the Trust.

    Now do not misunderstand me - government is good! But the debtor is slave to the lender. So then what of government that has to pledge its citizenry as surety for the mortgage?

    Look around what do you see?

    I see a people that willingly enslave themselves for absolutely NOTHING in exchange! Have your been Re-Venue-ed? Did you do it to yourself? Shalom, MJ
    July 15 2014

    Greetings!

    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR TALBOT COUNTY, MARYLAND

    TRISTATE CAPITAL BANK *
    Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor *

    v.
    *Case No. 20-C-12-008151
    WILLIAM G. CORACE *
    Defendant/Judgment Debtor *

    * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    SHERIFF'S SALE OF VALUABLE PERSONAL PROPERTY

    STATE OF MARYLAND
    TALBOT COUNTY, TO WIT:

    By virtue of a Writ of Execution issued by the Circuit Court for Talbot County, Maryland, and to me as said Sheriff of Talbot County (the "Sheriff"), directed at the suit of TriState Capital Bank v. William G. Corace, Case No. 20-C-12-008151, I have seized and taken into execution all the right and title, claim, interest, and estate both at law and in equity of the said Defendant William G. Corace, in, to, and about the following described personal property:

    Too much to list...............

    The deposit will be placed on the credit card that was used to register for the Auction.

    The remaining balance must be paid in U.S. currency dated September 12, 2001
    Last edited by Chex; 07-16-14, 11:13 AM.
    "And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"

    Comment

    • doug555
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 418

      #137
      Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
      It always matters, the nature and character of anything. Understanding, perceiving things incoherent to their nature is delusion - a world of illusions. Perceiving things according to law, like Michael Joseph points out is knowledge.

      That pointed out I can certainly agree with your points about usage fee. As I work with older suitors who were claiming a refund on FICA and Social Security "Tax" your point is amplified Doug. Discussion demanded we ascertain why these obvious insurance policies are considered a "tax" at all? [Federal Insurance Contributions Act and Social Security Insurance.]

      Answer: Because the amount you pay by way of Premiums is not set in a standard way but rather in proportion to how much "income" you bring in during the tax year.



      Regards,

      David Merrill.
      Yes, it does matter, but not in regard to it (income) itself being taxed. It isn't.

      I am not getting (nor asking for) a refund of FICA or Social Security. I am only getting a refund of Federal and State "income tax" withheld.

      However, I CAN (and SHOULD) include the FICA or Social Security withholding amounts in the total amount of lawful money demanded on line 21, because:
      1. those transaction amounts were rightly presumed to be FRNs and occurred as derivatives of the gross income paid BEFORE those amounts could be "redeemed";
      and,
      2. I have on the record stated my demand since 9/15/2011 as: "lawful money and full discharge is demanded for all transactions".

      Comment

      • David Merrill
        Administrator
        • Mar 2011
        • 5949

        #138
        Originally posted by doug555 View Post
        Yes, it does matter, but not in regard to it (income) itself being taxed. It isn't.

        I am not getting (nor asking for) a refund of FICA or Social Security. I am only getting a refund of Federal and State "income tax" withheld.

        However, I CAN (and SHOULD) include the FICA or Social Security withholding amounts in the total amount of lawful money demanded on line 21, because:
        1. those transaction amounts were rightly presumed to be FRNs and occurred as derivatives of the gross income paid BEFORE those amounts could be "redeemed";
        and,
        2. I have on the record stated my demand since 9/15/2011 as: "lawful money and full discharge is demanded for all transactions".


        You treat FICA and SSI as tax. Not insurance.
        www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
        www.bishopcastle.us
        www.bishopcastle.mobi

        Comment

        • walter
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2012
          • 662

          #139
          Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
          You treat FICA and SSI as tax. Not insurance.

          Insurance would be private contract while tax is for public purpose.

          Comment

          • David Merrill
            Administrator
            • Mar 2011
            • 5949

            #140
            That is a productive mental model - thank you!

            The only thing keeping the Federal Reserve System an instrumentality of government is that Congress has allowed it to issue stock certificates (notes) that are designed to reduce in value over time. Ergo the remedy:


            They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...
            www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
            www.bishopcastle.us
            www.bishopcastle.mobi

            Comment

            • Chex
              Senior Member
              • May 2011
              • 1032

              #141
              Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
              The only thing keeping the Federal Reserve System an instrumentality of government is that Congress has allowed it to issue stock certificates (notes) that are designed to reduce in value over time. Ergo the remedy: They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...
              That is a productive mental model - thank you!
              "And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"

              Comment

              • doug555
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2011
                • 418

                #142
                Originally posted by walter View Post
                Insurance would be private contract while tax is for public purpose.
                Does not the W-4 establish a private contract?

                Comment

                • David Merrill
                  Administrator
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 5949

                  #143
                  I would like to reconcile perspectives.

                  Government is an insurance policy. I lay my claim when I pull a car onto the road or even accept police protection (presumption). I think this is demonstrated especially when I enter into the downtown district of the city. I hear that is where police protection originated; a safe place for meeting between commercial vendors and customers.

                  This (public) kind of insurance premium rate is governed by how much of the Federal Reserve's private credit is changing hands - a sales tax, or an income tax. Like in the mental model I just described though, the Federal Reserve is a private agreement, in at least that one can choose to contract (endorse private credit) or to redeem lawful money by demand.

                  Social Security.

                  26usc 3101


                  (a) Old-age, survivors, and disability insurance
                  Attached Files
                  Last edited by David Merrill; 07-16-14, 10:17 PM.
                  www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                  www.bishopcastle.us
                  www.bishopcastle.mobi

                  Comment

                  • doug555
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2011
                    • 418

                    #144
                    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
                    I would like to reconcile perspectives.

                    Government is an insurance policy. I lay my claim when I pull a car onto the road or even accept police protection (presumption). I think this is demonstrated especially when I enter into the downtown district of the city. I hear that is where police protection originated; a safe place for meeting between commercial vendors and customers.

                    This (public) kind of insurance premium rate is governed by how much of the Federal Reserve's private credit is changing hands - a sales tax, or an income tax. Like in the mental model I just described though, the Federal Reserve is a private agreement, in at least that one can choose to contract (endorse private credit) or to redeem lawful money by demand.

                    Social Security.

                    "I" am using Social Security and Medicare... so "I" am willing to "pay" for those.

                    However, "I" am NOT using FRNs, so "I" am NOT willing to pay for their "usage" in the form of a "Federal" (private) "income tax".

                    Comment

                    • Chex
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2011
                      • 1032

                      #145
                      Social Security and Medicare is it a tax or is it insurance. Which is it?


                      Trust Fund Taxes

                      A trust fund tax is money currency withheld from an employee's wages (income tax, social security, and Medicare taxes) by an employer and held in trust until paid to the Treasury.

                      When you pay your employees, you do not pay them all the money they earned.

                      As their employer, you have the added responsibility of withholding taxes from their paychecks.

                      The income tax and employees' share of FICA (social security and Medicare) that you withhold from your employees' paychecks are part of their wages you pay to the Treasury instead of to your employees.

                      Your employees trust that you pay the withholding to the Treasury by making Federal Tax Deposits (PDF). That is why they are called trust fund taxes.

                      Through this withholding, your employees pay their contributions toward retirement benefits (social security and Medicare) and the income taxes reported on their tax returns.

                      Your employees' trust fund taxes, along with your matching share of FICA, are paid to the Treasury through the Federal Tax Deposit System.

                      The withheld part of these taxes is your employees' money, and the matching portion is their retirement benefit.

                      For additional information, refer to Employment Taxes and the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP).

                      Employment tax deposits are a current expense.

                      Postponing paying them is not the same as making a late payment on your phone bill or to a supplier.

                      Congress has established large penalties for delays in turning over your employment taxes to the Treasury.

                      The longer it takes to pay that money, the more it will cost you.

                      For more information, refer to Publication 15, Circular E, Employer's Tax Guide.

                      Rate the Small Business and Self-Employed Website

                      Last edited by Chex; 07-18-14, 02:59 PM.
                      "And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"

                      Comment

                      • LearnTheLaw
                        Member
                        • Nov 2012
                        • 59

                        #146
                        Originally posted by froze25 View Post
                        http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/section16.htm ) and provided me with a return as filed?
                        The Supreme Court has adjudicated on this and has determined that Federal Reserve Notes can act as Lawful Money if such a demand has been made. My demand has been made (shown on each paycheck's endorsements that I included with the 1040) to be given Lawful money so my return should reflect that I have only received Lawful Money for those paychecks that show that a restricted endorsement was made and should not be treated as Private credit extended by the Federal Reserve Banking System known as Federal Reserve Notes.
                        To be clear I am NOT asking for gold or any other metal considered to be precious.
                        I am asking that my income be treated as if it were US Treasury Notes (Lawful Money) and have the Tax Liability applied to my earnings as if I received US Treasury notes and/or Lawful money as I have indicated on my IRS 1040 that I submitted. It has always been my intention to use Lawful Money.
                        If you look at Title 12 USC 417 found here http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/section16.htm In section 7 of the webpage, it is clear that there is a distinction between Federal Reserve Notes and Lawful money.

                        Please include me in any correspondence that you have with the US Treasury Department on my behalf.
                        I wish only to have the Tax Liability, if any applied to me that is Lawfully required for receiving Lawful money in exchange for my labor and would like my original questions answered, not ignored and my demand under 12 USC 411 honored.

                        Truly Yours,

                        Steven Edward

                        Any updates to this Froze???

                        Comment

                        • Geetika
                          Junior Member
                          • Aug 2014
                          • 1

                          #147
                          Child custody

                          Child custody


                          I am glad to know more about this website..Very great knowledge on this website about Child custody..Government is an insurance policy. I lay my claim when I pull a car onto the road or even accept police protection (presumption). I think this is demonstrated especially when I enter into the downtown district of the city. I hear that is where police protection originated; a safe place for meeting between commercial vendors and customers. Thanks for sharing all that great information..For more information you can visit on this website:
                          cherylsteinesq.com

                          Comment

                          • David Merrill
                            Administrator
                            • Mar 2011
                            • 5949

                            #148
                            Thank you and welcome Geetika!
                            www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                            www.bishopcastle.us
                            www.bishopcastle.mobi

                            Comment

                            • BigBlueOcean
                              Junior Member
                              • Nov 2013
                              • 4

                              #149
                              3877 Form and Title 15 for the IRS

                              An addition to seal the witness to any mailing is the use of a Firm Mailing Book of Accountable Mail obtained free from the Post Office.
                              The Form 3877 Accountable Mail book is the Postal Clerk's inspection of who the mail is addressed to and the count of mailpieces and the postal clerk signs it making the clerk signature and the signature on the Return Receipt Two Witnesses !

                              Here is a case involving the IRS that the court discusses the Form 3877

                              Comment

                              • BigBlueOcean
                                Junior Member
                                • Nov 2013
                                • 4

                                #150
                                Take the return receipt to the post office and have them print out the electronic record showing the name and signature the person wrote down.



                                Originally posted by froze25 View Post
                                Guess what was in the Post office Box when I got home the return receipt card stamped, not signed "received April 8, 2014" I will post it scanned later tonight when I get a chance.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X