Tweet
Hello All, I am new to this forum and am in need of some assistance. I had been following the UCC process for about 10 years and up until about 2 years ago it seemed to work well. But the IRS levied my wages. I found Cracking the Code about 6 weeks ago, but even though it had some good information I still saw some holes in the process. While I was on their forum I was introduced to lawful money.( A member named Noah who I think is a member here). I have done some research and I understand the basic premise but not quite sure who to apply this knowledge. It appears that the first thing that I need to do is to go to my bank and rescind my signature card and sign another one stating that all transactions, deposits, withdrawls, and activities will be redeemed for lawful money per 12 USC 411. Then I should construct some sort of Notice and demand and send it to the IRS making them aware of my intentions of not using the FED's private credit. I should also get this on the public record. this is where I also need some help. I have never placed anything into the public record officially, I have placed it at the top of my documents and affidavits but don't know if this is correct so If some one can give me a step by step instructions to get this done It would be greatly appreciated.
-
-
It is best to be preventive about this but then obviously it is too late for that. You are being levied on an irrecusable obligation. You have been signing contract (albeit naked) and so starting now will be preventive from the point you make your demand into the future, for the rest of your life. Better late than never, understand?
It being a naked contract might give the Libel of Review and/or Notice and Demand some teeth to stop the levy but maybe not. This is not a typical naked contract; everybody in America practically signs endorsement on paychecks including Pete and his Lost Horizon gang. You will be fighting against by exposing nothing less than the biggest criminal syndicalism that has ever perpetuated human civilization.
Notice the NaD is served on the Federal Reserve Bank in Richmond. The LoR is served on the Secretary. You serve copy of the process on the IRS campus bugging you. I should warn you though, if you can get the IRS to apply your future Refunds toward your past obligations, that is considered an admission Redeeming Lawful Money works and is a considerable success story.
Regards,
David Merrill. -
Thank you for your response. Now serving the NaD on the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, should this be sent certified mail with return reciept? Now as for the LoR, sending it certified mail with return reciept as well? and should I send the IRS agent a copy of the LoR and the NaD?Comment
-
Check Notices for your PM (in a few).Comment
-
I have a question about my bank account. I am currently banking at wells fargo. Now i don't know if this is a non-interest bearing account. I have seen that this is the type of account desired. So what is the desired effect. Go to my bank and close the old account and open up a new non-interest bearing account then sign the interest card " Any and All Transactions redeemed for lawful money per 12 U.S.C. 411 "Comment
-
For the purposes of making your demand for Lawful money my understanding is that it makes no difference for you what type of account you have. From the banks point of view I agree with what I have read that speculates that since they cannot fractionally lend off of your deposits the Bank has no incentive to pay you interest so they prefer to have you in a non-interest bearing account. I have also read that some suitors have had their account changed to a non-interest bearing account without their knowledge or consent (I guess none is needed) and found out on their own.Originally posted by craneman3355 View Post
Hope this helps.
RegardsComment
-
Ok I have another question. The Fed is a foreign agency and in order for them to "lawfully" take my property then they must file a "verified" claim under oath and affirmation and file this cliam in the United States district court. I storngly believe that their is no such claim that has ever been filed and strongly believe that no one from the IRS or the FED will "verify" this claim under oath and affirmation. Now I have seen that people have been able to get a default judgment against the Fed and the IRS for failure to "verify" this claim. I have never filed anything with a court. Is someone wiling to help show me step by step so I can learn this process how to file this demand for "verification" of claim.Comment
-
I suggest you listen to Karl Lentz regarding requiring a verifiable claim from the moving party/accuser. There are many variables relating to what stage the matter is in and what you have done/not done to date regarding this matter.Originally posted by craneman3355 View Post
Search for topics relating to 'IRS', 'moving court', 'filing a claim', 'Plaintiff must appear", etc.Comment
-
AJ is suggesting that there was a time during the confiscation proceedings when you could have objected, but since the process was one of merely administrating an existing contract, you would have lost anyway. Once you stop using the Federal Reserve's debt money, you are not subject to income tax, and the contract is dissolved. The income tax as currently constructed is an excise tax on the use of FRN's, with a rebuttable presumption that you choose to volunteer to use debt money and pay taxes on its use. Stop doing that. As for what you did in the past, if you used their debt money, pay your taxes owed. However, DM has reported that some suitors have had the IRS apply refunds from past years to current tax debts, by applying their demand for lawful money retroactively. Perhaps you should PM DM on that subject.
FreedComment
-
I didn't volunteer to use debt money. I was not given full disclosure of any contract. you say that there is a naked contract, but if no man is willing to stand before me or in a court of record and verify this contract under oath and affirmation then they don't have a verified claim and are stealing my property under common law. I have had a dicussion with DM and he wanted compensation for his help in this matter. As I understand things. In order for anyone or any corporation to have standing they must have a verified claim upon which relief can be granted. they must swear under oath that I had violated their rights or harmed them in some way that they feel they deserve to be compensated for ie. there must be an injured party. In dealings with corporations you deal with contracts upon which I have had to have dishonored the contract in some way which injured the corporation and they demand compensation for this injury. The corporation must verify under oath and affirmation that I am a party to their claim and must present this contract to me for my examination and verification. If I didn't enter into this contract knowingly, willfully, and with full disclosure then this contract is void. Also a corporation has no rights so in order for this case to go forward a man from the corporation needs to step forward and swear under oath and affirmation that a contract exists and this claim needs to be filed in the district court before any collection action can "lawfully" be taken.Comment
-
If you filed a 1040 for the tax (now under dispute as being ) owed, then you did verify this contract, and you violated it, so now the IRS uses their corporate court to administer the contract dispute (UCC rules, no Constitutional rights in that court, as no actual humans allowed in there, only corporations). There is no after the fact way to avoid this outcome that I have seen work. You can try making your demand for lawful money retroactive by denying that you ever intended to use Federal Reserve credit, but that is an iffy approach which they may or may not honor. True you were not given full disclosure, and thus no informed consent was given, but the filing of the 1040 will likely prevail.
Freed
If you had not filed a 1040, then you could take the case into an Article III court, representing yourself in personam, and introduce your Constitutional rights. Then you might prevail on the lack of a valid contract, as other suitors have successfully done. Once in the IRS court, no one has prevailed. Joseph Schiff got ten years in prison from this court, and he never got them to tell him the law under which he was prosecuted. Remember, the IRS court is under color of admiralty, operates under UCC, and 'you' have no rights, only implied contracts.Last edited by Freed Gerdes; 01-09-14, 02:29 AM.Comment
-
notice of rescission
If there does exist a valid contract, that can be presented for verification on and for the record, then rescind the agreement; now for then.
i; a man, believed at one time that the agreement was a benefit to me, but now i believe it does me harm. It is my wish to go back to the point prior to this agreement.
A man is unlimited in his capacity and always has superior standing over that which is not man, if he knows how to properly claim, and keep, said standing.
Contact novation and/or full rescission is available without dishonor for a man - who will swear under oath that a man does not have this ability by inherent right. Who will stand as surety, with full liability in open court, for the paper claims of 'IRS' or 'UNITED STATES'?
When a man is present and knows how to move and keep his court, only another man can be heard; and, said man is not allowed to hide behind a cloak/mask/title/office of any kind. The man is fully liable for his actions and claims against another man - 'IRS' or 'UNITED STATES' will never utter a word, verify a claim or 'do' anything.
We need to learn this, and live it, to the point that we present it naturally, without rehearsal or thinking - when this happens, "they" and "them" disappear.Comment
-
I filed a 1040 for 2008 (page2) and received a full refund by operation of law. That same year I also deposited over $80k into bank account titled with the same NAME as on the tax return. Yet no one has come forward claiming violation of contract. If the $80k was income why hasn't the IRS stepped forward with its claim? Where's my levy?Comment
-
No one has a right to take your claimed property, especially the 'Government'. The 'IRS' cannot "step forward" or "claim" anything; there is only a [wo]man who will write, and send, a notice or letter making "paper claims" of alleged debt on behalf of a non-living entity.Originally posted by JohnnyCash View Post
What will you do if such a thing should happen?Comment
-
Exactly by operation of law where is the IRS/FRB claim.Originally posted by JohnnyCash View Post
As AJ said in http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...ll=1#post12472
Surety is most common in contracts in which one party questions whether the counter party in the contract will be able to fulfill all requirements. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/surety.asp
Surety. An individual who undertakes an obligation to pay a sum of money or to perform some duty or promise for another in the event that person fails to act. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/surety
Freed has it going on here. http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...ll=1#post12471 and on post #11.... Article III addresses the judicial power of the federal government. The vast majority of federal courts are "Article III courts," including the U.S. Supreme Court, the various U.S. Courts of Appeals (for the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, D.C. and Federal Circuits), and all of the United States District Courts other than the territorial courts. The U.S. Court of International Trade is also an Article III court. Judges of Article III courts enjoy salary protection and life tenure (that is, they may only be removed by impeachment and conviction). http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_th...cle_III_courts
Nice Brian. What I like the most about the opening of this statement was about congress.
Coinage, Weights, and MeasuresCongress may charter banks and endow them with the right to issue circulating notes, and it may restrain the circulation of notes not issued under its own authority. To this end it may impose a prohibitive tax upon the circulation of the notes of state banks or of municipal corporations. Page 305. https://bulk.resource.org/gpo.gov/co...n/2002/011.pdf
If an institution chooses a commercial bank charter, the decision is whether to apply for a national bank charter from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) or a state bank charter from the state regulatory authority.
Commercial banks with a national charter are supervised by the OCC and are members of the Federal Reserve System. Commercial banks with a state charter are supervised by both the applicable state banking department and either the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for state nonmember banks or the Federal Reserve for state member banks.
Footnote 1. The word "member" refers to Federal Reserve System membership. A state nonmember bank is a state-chartered bank that has chosen not be a Federal Reserve System member. A state member bank is a state-chartered bank that has chosen to be a member of the Federal Reserve. http://www.fedpartnership.gov/bank-l...cess.cfm#_ftn1
More on McCulloch page 37. By its silence, considered in connection with the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of McCulloch against the State of Maryland, this act takes from the States the power to tax a portion of the banking business carried on within their limits, in subversion of one of the strongest barriers which secured them against Federal encroachments.
Banking, like farming, manufacturing, or any other occupation or profession, is a business, the right to follow which is not originally derived from the laws.
Every citizen and every company of citizens in all of our States possessed the right until the State legislatures deemed it good policy to prohibit private banking by law. If the prohibitory State laws were now repealed, every citizen would again possess the right. The State banks are a qualified restoration of the right which has been taken away by the laws against banking, guarded by such provisions and limitations as in the opinion of the State legislatures the public interest requires. These corporations, unless there be an exemption in their charter, are, like private bankers and banking companies, subject to State taxation. The manner in which these taxes shall be laid depends wholly on legislative discretion. It may be upon the bank, upon the stock, upon the profits, or in any other mode which the sovereign power shall will. http://eweb.furman.edu/~benson/docs/ajveto.htm
P36 was a slap in the head and on page 32 they warned us about our land."And if I could I surely would Stand on the rock that Moses stood"Comment
Comment