Dishonor Disqualifies the “UST’s” Claims of Authority and Jurisdiction

[Guest]

The following is offered as opinion only through a mental model surrounding the "use of trusts, chattels and creations of another".







nearlyANY of its claims when encountered by a declared living and breathing man or woman on the land, created in the image of God, who uses out of necessity and for righteous purposes only, the creations of that dishonorable creator. The honor or dishonor of the TRUST mechanism, its Trustees and the true intents behind these entities and creations dictates who has the ability, authority and power to make claims or judgments against another. Being the creator of a thing does NOT, in my opinion, automatically make that creator sovereign over the thing and the fruits of that thing. Honor, truth and righteousness of intent are the virtues of a lawful claimthe one in honor

is merely picked up and utilized out of necessityinherentfalse (perhaps knowingly false) assumptions





through fraud by omission, concealment and non-disclosurefor that very cause.

Therefore, any man or woman on the land who has made in known in a competent court of record that he/she is aware of this dishonorable scheme of the UST, may, with full God-given and inherentNOT for greedy personal gain.

according to their present situation

The only issue left is Honor and Dishonor.

[motla68]

The following is offered as opinion only through a mental model surrounding the "use of trusts, chattels and creations of another".







nearlyANY of its claims when encountered by a declared living and breathing man or woman on the land, created in the image of God, who uses out of necessity and for righteous purposes only, the creations of that dishonorable creator. The honor or dishonor of the TRUST mechanism, its Trustees and the true intents behind these entities and creations dictates who has the ability, authority and power to make claims or judgments against another. Being the creator of a thing does NOT, in my opinion, automatically make that creator sovereign over the thing and the fruits of that thing. Honor, truth and righteousness of intent are the virtues of a lawful claimthe one in honor

is merely picked up and utilized out of necessityinherentfalse (perhaps knowingly false) assumptions





through fraud by omission, concealment and non-disclosurefor that very cause.

Therefore, any man or woman on the land who has made in known in a competent court of record that he/she is aware of this dishonorable scheme of the UST, may, with full God-given and inherentNOT for greedy personal gain.

according to their present situation

The only issue left is Honor and Dishonor.

Wow! Brilliant post Anthony. In these thoughts you are hovering around the crust of the pie in which I have been trying to convey to everyone here, time to dive in with both feet into that pie.

Problem is we have been doing what we have been told to do so long that now we are waken up the system needs uneducated then re-educted again to this natural law which is suppose to be unalienable to us. Right now they are way out of bounds of the Usufructuary as it was intended for, I am growing tired and not sure that correcting the mistake will ever happen in my life time so I take part in educating the next generation as Thomas Jefferson discussed after he quoted " the earth is held in usufruct for the living ".
This is why we are looking for help from trust law, which a couple people have done. You create a private trust and then you live through that certificate of trust as you would have a birth certificate. After that your name becomes what it has been all along, just a called name because you need a fake entity (private trust) to pass through commerce.
WE have not given up on working it from the Birth Certificate side though, keep you all up to date on that.

Peace be with you.

[stoneFree]

Yes, thank you Anthony. So it's two trusts then; one formed at birth by STATE OF ___, and then the United States CQV trust. Can anyone recommend a good book/text for more on these trusts, or trusts in general? I have heard that modern day trust law states that no one need know or understand they are forming or are a part of a trust. ?Que?

The hidden, concealed, deceptive nature of it all is mind boggling.

[Michael Joseph]

Scripture is a great book to learn about Trusts. All of the trust law comes from Scripture.

[Michael Joseph]

Gilbert on Trusts; Bogert Trust Restatements; Kenoe on Land Trusts

Basics for beginners

Trust Law is international.

[Anthony Joseph]

Yes, thank you Anthony. So it's two trusts then; one formed at birth by STATE OF ___, and then the United States CQV trust. Can anyone recommend a good book/text for more on these trusts, or trusts in general? I have heard that modern day trust law states that no one need know or understand they are forming or are a part of a trust. ?Que?

The hidden, concealed, deceptive nature of it all is mind boggling.

I believe at "birth" (birth is a term only for a vessel of some kind and does NOT define or describe the nativity of a living soul) the "legal name" is created by the STATE OF XXXX utilizing the information provided by mom and dad and then transformed/manipulated into the name of the fiduciary/surety they "hope" you will become. I say "hope" cynically because I know there is NO "hoping" involved since societal/governmental conditioning and controlled information/education has predetermined the outcome of that supposed "hope". The TRUST formation, in the vain of the all upper case FIRST MIDDLE LAST "name" is constructed after the fact by either you or those who presume that you have or will accept the duty of "settling the account" THROUGH YOUR OWN ENERGY AND SWEAT EQUITY when they feel a breach of trust has occured. Proper identification in one's True Name at the outset of any encounter is grounds for "abatement for misnomer" as David Merrill has demonstrated for us in detail.

This is precisely why I opine that the "UST", the entity which maintains and facilitates this dishonorable and malintentious mechanism, LOSES, SURRENDERS and DISQUALIFIES itself from claiming any authority or jusidiction over a man or woman who peaceably inhabits this land and who clearly declares and exhibits competence to self-govern, even though this man or woman may pick up and use the chattels, tools or trust vessels created by the "UST" OUT OF NECESSITY AND FOR RIGHTEOUS PURPOSES ONLY. This is directly due to the fact that the UST has created, and continues to maintain, an environment which is intolerant to, and imposing upon, EVERY MAN AND WOMAN on this land who denies the voluntary consent which is REQUIRED by the UST in order to stay within their "legal" protection from committing crimes against "humanity" via forced servitude.

Either way, the "UST" operates from a position and character of complete and utter dishonor. What lawful or justified claim can be made from such a position? If we acted in such a manner, would we have standing to make any lawful claims upon anyone?

Just because one may have created a "thing", doesn't mean that that creator has unchallenged sovereignty over it, especially if it intentionally effects and intrudes upon the lives of millions of innocent people by design.

DISHONOR DISQULAIFIES ALL CLAIMS.

[motla68]

United States Code Title 18 section 242. "force and coercion under color of law is made void by the law"

Another great post Anthony, keep'em coming!

I am not sure what helped you turn the corner on all this, but liking what I am seeing now.

[Sovereignty]

I find this interesting. Though it seems an impossible
task getting everyone to think like this; not that it's
our job, but imagine the world we'd live in if a majority
of people actually understood this...and applied it?

Instead, you could guarantee they'd argue vociferously
against this concept - the power of a 'good' public
(ed)indoctrination will not be denied!

[David Merrill]

I find this interesting. Though it seems an impossible
task getting everyone to think like this; not that it's
our job, but imagine the world we'd live in if a majority
of people actually understood this...and applied it?

Instead, you could guarantee they'd argue vociferously
against this concept - the power of a 'good' public
(ed)indoctrination will not be denied!

I am enjoying this thread too!

It is good to understand trusts in terms and definitions I agree. But that takes a lot of time and reading. I think it beneficial then to consider trust as a noun and a verb at the same time. I always apply my understanding to redeeming lawful money and endorsement - trust in the Fed; or non-endorsement, avoiding that trust.

I think you have captured the intent of True Name though. The basis of any relationship in trust is always the parties being stable. Relationship is one to another.

[motla68]

I find this interesting. Though it seems an impossible
task getting everyone to think like this; not that it's
our job, but imagine the world we'd live in if a majority
of people actually understood this...and applied it?

Instead, you could guarantee they'd argue vociferously
against this concept - the power of a 'good' public
(ed)indoctrination will not be denied!

Natural law is a whole lot simpler system to live by, not only do you have a abundance of philanthropist, but an exchanging of goods and services without the use of money. At one time there was a concept called barter banking, but now it s morphed into something called time banking. I spend an hour fixing some ones car, we agree on a hour worked, that gets put into the time bank and then later I spend that where someone cooks me a meal, also in this concept it does not have to be a direct exchange either.

My family takes part in a co-op or 2, plus we also participate in a community meal potluck style and there is always more then enough to eat for everyone at that time. The concepts are no more just a idea for us, we actually are living them out and encourage others to do the same.

[Anthony Joseph]

United States Code Title 18 section 242. "force and coercion under color of law is made void by the law"

Another great post Anthony, keep'em coming!

I am not sure what helped you turn the corner on all this, but liking what I am seeing now.

I 'turned the corner' years ago thanks in large part to the prayers that were answered by Our Father in heaven to reveal His truth to me. I believe He used David Merrill as His "conduit of truth" to reach me. It was David's inspired writings that "cured" me of my 'pseudonomania' (false name craziness) as he calls it and it was David who introduced me to the concept of demanding and redeeming lawful money. After joining the 'suitor' group, I have had the enormous pleasure of gaining even more knowledge from those in the group who shared their concepts and experiences. I do my best to contribute to the discussion or challenge ideas and methods offered in that arena. You can ask your friend Michael Joseph about our exchanges which make our brief discourse here seem very reserved. I appreciate and respect his knowledge and offerings and I find myself with a greater understanding of certain trust formations and relationships due to his writings. There are many others who I have learned from also in our suitor group and you know who you are; I thank you for that. I will not mention by name here since they use distinct usernames and not their True Names.

[David Merrill]

Natural law is a whole lot simpler system to live by, not only do you have a abundance of philanthropist, but an exchanging of goods and services without the use of money. At one time there was a concept called barter banking, but now it s morphed into something called time banking. I spend an hour fixing some ones car, we agree on a hour worked, that gets put into the time bank and then later I spend that where someone cooks me a meal, also in this concept it does not have to be a direct exchange either.

My family takes part in a co-op or 2, plus we also participate in a community meal potluck style and there is always more then enough to eat for everyone at that time. The concepts are no more just a idea for us, we actually are living them out and encourage others to do the same.

Excellent! Coops are great. Barter/time systems are too but you really have to give 120% and expect 80% to realize the profit. Which can be pretty good while everybody is at peace and in harmony.

My experience is a bad one though. I went to a restaurant with my "credits" after it had sold and they put up a little Notice about the barter system. I missed it and had to drive over to the bank to pay in cash.

[Michael Joseph]

I find when I help someone who is deserving of my help that I feel really good about myself. A friend of mine helped me to see how that internal struggle works within the conscious and sub-conscious mind. I also find when I help someone who is undeserving of my help I feel horrible. I think the reason is based on value.


For the man with the value is Michael Joseph.

If I am valuable, I demand value in exchange. Otherwise, I shall stop extending my energy to those who just take take take....I however, appreciate those who give back. So to that - thank you to those who post in this space. You are benefactors and appreciated.

Some people are of the opinion that if one is with the knowledge. that one is duty bound to share the knowledge. Not so. If I am asked to share, then that shows faith in me that I have the answer and so I will share if I can; however, if a man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.

I think the Scripture nails this down pretty good in the Acronym ASK. Ask, Seek, Knock. Each of the foregoing takes action. And thus, faith absent deeds is dead or said another way I see your faith thru your deeds. Anyone with children can easily see this. Little children ask so many questions of mom and dad because they have the Faith in mom and dad to believe mom and dad have the answer.

Yet, I digress.

Now to the point. Thank you AJ for your kind words. While we do not see eye to eye many times you and I still enter the arena of discourse to "sharpen" the intellect. You are not just a taker, You lend your energy to discovery. And that is what, I think we are about. Attempting to discover the truth.

Consider now, UNDER what law? To claim Under a law grants jurisdiction to the one who gave the law! Selah.

[David Merrill]

I find when I help someone who is deserving of my help that I feel really good about myself. A friend of mine helped me to see how that internal struggle works within the conscious and sub-conscious mind. I also find when I help someone who is undeserving of my help I feel horrible. I think the reason is based on value.


For the man with the value is Michael Joseph.

If I am valuable, I demand value in exchange. Otherwise, I shall stop extending my energy to those who just take take take....I however, appreciate those who give back. So to that - thank you to those who post in this space. You are benefactors and appreciated.

Some people are of the opinion that if one is with the knowledge. that one is duty bound to share the knowledge. Not so. If I am asked to share, then that shows faith in me that I have the answer and so I will share if I can; however, if a man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.

I think the Scripture nails this down pretty good in the Acronym ASK. Ask, Seek, Knock. Each of the foregoing takes action. And thus, faith absent deeds is dead or said another way I see your faith thru your deeds. Anyone with children can easily see this. Little children ask so many questions of mom and dad because they have the Faith in mom and dad to believe mom and dad have the answer.

Yet, I digress.

Now to the point. Thank you AJ for your kind words. While we do not see eye to eye many times you and I still enter the arena of discourse to "sharpen" the intellect. You are not just a taker, You lend your energy to discovery. And that is what, I think we are about. Attempting to discover the truth.

Consider now, UNDER what law? To claim Under a law grants jurisdiction to the one who gave the law! Selah.

And your artistic talents too.

[Frederick Burrell]

Thank you Anthony Joseph for that very insightful post. Great insight into the larger picture and our relation to it. fB