This may or may not help, just putting this out there as I've personally seen it used to have an automatic weapons charge completely dropped by the prosecuting attorney.
Karl Lentz discovered this process and others have used it to be extremely effective.
You would file a CLAIM ( not a criminal complaint but an actual CLAIM against the officer that pulled you over. Something like this:
'i: a man; claim bob jones interfere with my right to travel by continually stopping me and demanding i present him with identification; i require twenty five hundred dollars compensation; i require a court of record; i require a trial by jury; i, say here, and will verify in open court, all herein be true-john doe.'
You are essentially demanding an article 3 common law court (my understanding is they do not exist until you request a court of record. Juries rule these trials and there is no appeal, the juries decision is final.
You can also go after the prosecutor with this:
" i: a man; require the STATE OF TEXAS to show up and verify his/her claim against me so i may cross examine my accuser (the plaintiff must appear) and compensate him for any harm i may have caused. If this man/woman that goes by the name 'STATE OF TEXAS' cannot show up to verify his/her claim, i require this matter immediately discharged. It is my belief there is no man/woman named 'STATE OF TEXAS' who can verify this claim by uttering with his/her voice I've done wrong, therefore pressing it upon the record. It is also my belief, that someone is filing complaints (false claims) on behalf of this entity known as the 'STATE OF TEXAS' in an attempt to unjustly enrich themselves and the 'STATE OF TEXAS' (whoever those individuals may be). If this matter is not immediately discharged, I will require leave of court so I may properly bring an actual claim before the court to address this trespass against me in the proper venue-a court of record (trespass being: filing false claims, barratry, malicious prosecution, unjust enrichment, etc.), in which I will be requiring compensation for wasting my valuable time, money, and resources having to deal with this complaint, as I do not have time to answer complaints without compensation at this time. If there is an actual verifiable claim before the court, I will be more than happy to show up free of charge and address any proper and verifiable claim against me - John Doe."
Youtube has hundreds of hours of Karl Lentz discussing this process as well as others who have used it successfully.
Karl Lentz discovered this process and others have used it to be extremely effective.
You would file a CLAIM ( not a criminal complaint but an actual CLAIM against the officer that pulled you over. Something like this:
'i: a man; claim bob jones interfere with my right to travel by continually stopping me and demanding i present him with identification; i require twenty five hundred dollars compensation; i require a court of record; i require a trial by jury; i, say here, and will verify in open court, all herein be true-john doe.'
You are essentially demanding an article 3 common law court (my understanding is they do not exist until you request a court of record. Juries rule these trials and there is no appeal, the juries decision is final.
You can also go after the prosecutor with this:
" i: a man; require the STATE OF TEXAS to show up and verify his/her claim against me so i may cross examine my accuser (the plaintiff must appear) and compensate him for any harm i may have caused. If this man/woman that goes by the name 'STATE OF TEXAS' cannot show up to verify his/her claim, i require this matter immediately discharged. It is my belief there is no man/woman named 'STATE OF TEXAS' who can verify this claim by uttering with his/her voice I've done wrong, therefore pressing it upon the record. It is also my belief, that someone is filing complaints (false claims) on behalf of this entity known as the 'STATE OF TEXAS' in an attempt to unjustly enrich themselves and the 'STATE OF TEXAS' (whoever those individuals may be). If this matter is not immediately discharged, I will require leave of court so I may properly bring an actual claim before the court to address this trespass against me in the proper venue-a court of record (trespass being: filing false claims, barratry, malicious prosecution, unjust enrichment, etc.), in which I will be requiring compensation for wasting my valuable time, money, and resources having to deal with this complaint, as I do not have time to answer complaints without compensation at this time. If there is an actual verifiable claim before the court, I will be more than happy to show up free of charge and address any proper and verifiable claim against me - John Doe."
Youtube has hundreds of hours of Karl Lentz discussing this process as well as others who have used it successfully.

Comment