The inhabitants of any county shall within the boundaries of that county be and

[Gavilan]

http://law.onecle.com/new-jersey/40-municipalities-and-counties/41a-24.html

New Jersey Statutes - Title 40 Municipalities and Counties - 40:41A-24 Incorporation
The inhabitants of any county shall within the boundaries of that county be and remain a body corporate and politic, with perpetual succession

I was looking for the basis or fundamental law that gives authority to govern, cops seem to be always asking where do you reside. Look at the above cited section, it's the inhabitants that are the body politic (and corporate). The next section, tells you it's the registered voters who approve the direction of gov.

New Jersey Statutes - Title 40 Municipalities and Counties - 40:41A-25 Government of county after adoption of optional plan
40:41A-25. Government of county after adoption of optional plan
Upon adoption by the registered voters of any county of any of the optional forms of government set forth in this act, the county shall thereafter be governed by the plan adopted, by the provisions of this law applicable to all optional plans, and by all general laws, subject to the transitional provisions in article 7 of this act.

I haven't come across anything that says U.S. citizens are the prerequisite people to the organizing of county government.

[Gavilan]

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10536324476585169313&q=inhabitant&hl=en&as_sdt=4,31

98 N.J. Super. 451 (1968)
237 A.2d 640
THE BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, ET AL, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
LLOYD W. McCORKLE, COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided January 5, 1968.

453
*453 Mr. Sanford Soren, County Solicitor, attorney for plaintiffs (Mr. Richard D. Ehrlich appearing).

Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of State of New Jersey, attorney for defendants (Mr. Eugene T. Urbaniak appearing).

MARTINO, A.J.S.C.

The parties to this litigation have agreed upon the facts and have filed with the court a stipulation of those facts.

454
*454 The basic legal questions deal with the application of certain New Jersey laws to inhabitants of Fort Dix and McGuire Air Force Base, two federal military bases located within the boundaries of Burlington County.

Two distinct factual patterns are involved. The first relates to children, born to inhabitants of the bases, who become dependent and require the care or guardianship of the New Jersey Bureau of Children's Services. The second concerns base inhabitants who become mentally ill and require admission to a State Hospital for care and treatment.

Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment against the defendants, while the latter counterclaim for a declaratory judgment against the plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs contend that L. 1938, c. 354, ceded jurisdiction to the United States over lands theretofore acquired by it for military purposes in Burlington County and concurrent jurisdiction was reserved by the State only for the execution of civil and criminal process. Additionally, N.J.S.A. 52:30-1 and 52:30-2, incorporating the provision of the general cession act of March 29, 1907 (L. 1907, c. 19) cede exclusive jurisdiction to any land acquired by the United States, for certain enumerated purposes, the State retaining concurrent jurisdiction only for the service of process in civil and criminal proceedings.

Plaintiffs further contend that these acts preclude a County Court from committing any inhabitant of the two federal bases to a state hospital and preclude the county adjuster from processing applications for such commitments.

Defendants, however, contend that N.J.S.A. 30:4-27 to 31 permit the county court to commit any person believed to be mentally ill to a state hospital, whether a resident or non-resident, and notwithstanding the person may be an inhabitant of one of the military bases; that said base residents are entitled to care in a state hospital, and that the county adjuster is not precluded by any law from processing such applications for their commitment.

455
*455 The United States of America has filed an amicus curiae brief with the court in which it joins with these defendants in contending that the inhabitants of the federal bases are entitled to the services involved.

Plaintiffs contend that the Federal Government has created the problems which exist with respect to the welfare of residents of federal enclaves, and by shunning its responsibilities the Federal Government seeks to place the burden upon the taxpayers of adjoining sovereignties.."

[Gavilan]

A non-resident of this State may be committed to a mental hospital in this State in the same manner as residents may be admitted and committed."

And N.J.S.A. 30:4-57 provides:

"If the patient shall be found to be mentally ill and to have no legal settlement in any county in this State, the Court may commit him to a mental hospital owned by the State."

A reading of the above statutes clearly indicates that insofar as the commitment of a mentally ill person is concerned, residence is of no significance. Certainly, any person living on a United States military base located within Burlington County is either a resident of New Jersey or a non-resident. In any event, he may be committed to a mental hospital under the above statutes. The wording of the statutes is plain and clear and their meaning obvious.

The New Jersey statutory scheme concerning mentally ill persons is consistent with cases in other jurisdictions which have held that the state's power over the mentally ill derives from the necessity of assisting and protecting such individuals and the community, and is, therefore, not confined to persons who are residents of the State.

In the case of Bliss v. Bliss, 133 Md. 61, 104 A. 467 (Ct. App. 1918), the court enunciated this policy:

"* * * the jurisdiction of courts of equity to issue writs de lunatico inquierendo is exercised for the protection of the community, and the protection of the person and property of the alleged lunatic, there is no reason why it should be confined to cases in which the unfortunate persons are residents of or have property in
459
*459 the state. It is their presence within the limits of the state that necessitates the exercise of the power to protect their persons and the community in which they may be placed * * *" (104 A., at p. 471)

Finally, it should be noted that New Jersey enacted the Interstate Compact on Mental Health in 1956. Pursuant to this act, N.J.S.A. 30:7B-1 et seq., an expeditious method is established for the treatment of the mentally ill and their interstate transfer. N.J.S.A. 30:7B-3 provides:

"(a) Whenever a person physically present

.............

[Gavilan]

.............

[David Merrill]

Thank you for posting that. I am looking it over again and trying to discern what you are trying to get across? Perhaps you could restate the point of showing us the article, or collection of citations.

the mentally ill resident upon federal territory.

Plaintiffs make the further argument that because some states have accepted the authority to oversee the welfare of inhabitants of a federal enclave does not mean that the responsibility thereof rests with the states, and if the states failed to cooperate it is extremely likely that the Federal Government would then assume its responsibility by means of enactment of necessary legislation.

Meanwhile what you bring to mind is the Eleventh Amendment and how an Individual cannot sue the United States or a State, as a corporation. More like, like can only name like. An individual is in sin, and choosing sin means separate and separation is sin - and round and round we go into insanity...

Ergo I highlight mentally ill and upon the territorial claim at the same time. Distinctly separate from reality. In reality one is whole... in delusion one can imagine that debt has substance.

[allodial]

http://law.onecle.com/new-jersey/40-...es/41a-24.html



I was looking for the basis or fundamental law that gives authority to govern, cops seem to be always asking where do you reside. Look at the above cited section, it's the inhabitants that are the body politic (and corporate). The next section, tells you it's the registered voters who approve the direction of gov.



I haven't come across anything that says U.S. citizens are the prerequisite people to the organizing of county government.

Counties are typically subdivisions of a state. A county or a state can have both exterior boundaries and interior boundaries. AFAIK counties, cities and villages are public. Public is the opposite of what?

[Gavilan]

Meanwhile what you bring to mind is the Eleventh Amendment and how an Individual cannot sue the United States or a State, as a corporation. More like, like can only name like. An individual is in sin, and choosing sin means separate and separation is sin - and round and round we go into insanity...

Ergo I highlight mentally ill and upon the territorial claim at the same time. Distinctly separate from reality. In reality one is whole... in delusion one can imagine that debt has substance.

David, when I was last arrested the cops kept asking me where did I live, where did I reside? To me it was obvious, I live in my body, but I have a residence in NYC and place of abode in NJ. But choosing to not say anything that could be used against me, I chose to remain silent.

In court, the hearing officer kept asking me what was the zip code for the place where I live? Color me confused, I told him I didn't understand what he meant. He sent me to county jail to be examined by the psychiatrist. At county jail, I asked the psychiatrist if he worked for the state, he said yes. Then I said, I respectfully choose to stay silent.

The point is that there is a clear puzzle as to how they have structure this system that I have not been able to figure out completely.

I believe in God, I believe in the Scriptures, but I am having a tremendous struggle with my pride and ego. I have walked away from all my wealth, and yes, I have experienced a tremendous sense of Liberty and Freedom. Yet, here I am asking the Lord to please guide me to the next step according to His will.

[Gavilan]

Counties are typically subdivisions of a state. A county or a state can have both exterior boundaries and interior boundaries. AFAIK counties, cities and villages are public. Public is the opposite of what?

Private? Yes?

[David Merrill]

Your trust is well placed. I carry the Redeemed Lawful Money stamp and it is usually adequate for my signature all alone. In my mind this is a removal (redemption) from the district in which the Fourteenth Amendment US citizen is presumed to reside:

[David Merrill]

P.S. That does not mean that in the "court's" mind it is so.

I once heard a suitor plead guilty - just to get back into the system. The judge ruled so but suspended all sentencing so he could get licensed up. The prosecutor R4C'd the ruling apparently and will not dismiss the charges...

Some times these lessons take a while to become obvious, what the lesson really is. And I can only say I have arrived because of how many times I have arrived already.

My advice about gathering certified copies of the actor's oaths is also on the presumption you have the Register of Action. Go to a room in the courthouse called RECORDS and have the clerk show you the entire case file. There should be a document, maybe Summary of Actions or Docket. Get a certified copy of that. Do both of these things in the same outing, gathering oaths and the Register of Action because you may tip off the DA and scared people are unpredictable; as you already know.

What I am encouraging is that you build the record on testimony from the source clerks responsible for providing it. You can then enter a Criminal Complaint in the federal courthouse for $46.




Not much has become of these, but they do seem to stop further activity. So I suggest that you sign it in front of a notary, open the Miscellaneous Case file with the original and the Commission Certificate original too. Get the Commission Certificate from the Secretary of State too. This way, even if the notary strikes through "Judge", you have a fully verified signature and it causes contortions so to avoid cognizance, so I believe your right to citizen's arrest kicks in when you have a fully verified signature.

Decide what the charges are only after you get the first errand done. If there are bogus oaths (likely so) then you can sue the "judge" individually. Keep in mind that attorneys will understand this posted approach much better than you or I do. So remember that forgiveness is the only safe way off the battlefield.

That part (I get it) about you have lost everything. That is the song of the misguided patriot nutjob. Radical responsibility, only yourself to blame, and then readily forgive yourself because if you cannot love yourself you cannot love your neighbor or God. That guilt and fear God is angry - start treating THAT as sin, and go back to your Bible reading; it will make much more sense.

[Gavilan]

David, thank you for posting your observations!

Just want to say, I did not lose everything. I chose to give up my wealth when I discovered that my family were being hostile to each other because of it. I gave it all away to them willingly and with full faith that the Lord would give me even if I was completely destitute. This is the thing, I can become wealthy again easily if I were to choose it if I walk back into the system, can't do that though, my conscience tells there is another way, the Right way. Which is the way I choose to follow, if I am to die broke, so be it. However, my desire is to love my neighbor as I love myself, and my unconditional love for the Lord.

Yes, I am struggling, and every single day I ask for guidance and the proper way for me to help myself and help my neighbor according to His will.

You know, I am no longer angry, I pray for those that persecute me and those like me for our faith because they don't understand that there is tremendous joy and happiness beyond material wealth, clearly they see that as mental illness.

Now, don't get me wrong, material wealth is essential to accomplish may useful things. Wealth is a tool, for which you must choose its purpose, i.e., to aid or to harm others.

Thank you for your perspective and correction into reading the Bible, I welcome it gladly and with joy into my heart.

I am also working into implementing your suggestions. Again, I can't say thank you enough, wish you could bear my heart's gratitude.

[David Merrill]

David, thank you for posting your observations!

Just want to say, I did not lose everything. I chose to give up my wealth when I discovered that my family were being hostile to each other because of it. I gave it all away to them willingly and with full faith that the Lord would give me even if I was completely destitute. This is the thing, I can become wealthy again easily if I were to choose it if I walk back into the system, can't do that though, my conscience tells there is another way, the Right way. Which is the way I choose to follow, if I am to die broke, so be it. However, my desire is to love my neighbor as I love myself, and my unconditional love for the Lord.

Yes, I am struggling, and every single day I ask for guidance and the proper way for me to help myself and help my neighbor according to His will.

You know, I am no longer angry, I pray for those that persecute me and those like me for our faith because they don't understand that there is tremendous joy and happiness beyond material wealth, clearly they see that as mental illness.

Now, don't get me wrong, material wealth is essential to accomplish may useful things. Wealth is a tool, for which you must choose its purpose, i.e., to aid or to harm others.

Thank you for your perspective and correction into reading the Bible, I welcome it gladly and with joy into my heart.

I am also working into implementing your suggestions. Again, I can't say thank you enough, wish you could bear my heart's gratitude.

I have helped hundreds of people setting up evidence repository in the federal courthouse. PM when you think you have a handle on some source testimony. Even if you do not want restitution, we can prevent this sort of abuse in the future.

The other night I was headed home on a motorway in Colorado in a car with one headlight, no left turn signal and was caught speeding 70 mph in a 50. The emergency lights flashed and they "officer" came up and I handed the docs and he said that he would just give me a warning for the headlight. He left to his car and returned in less than 5 minutes and handed me a warning and said have a good night. He never mentioned a warning for the speeding, which usually raises the most cash. This type of occurrence has come up several times and they waived prosecution for a reason, not quite sure as what it is. But if I had to guess it would be the challenge of the LOR along with the other claims made. There has to be something as I have not even received a ticket for numerous instances. To further state that the local Courts just want me gone and have bent over to see me off with the least amount of further damage. It is simply bizarre as others familiar with the legal ideas I presented with the help of others, some of them e-mail on this "club". So then officials speak with me they get confused as to what is going on as the system just backed down.

Thanks again ----- ----- and David Merrill.

That suitor was headed for jail in two counties and that was compounded by probation violations... messy!


Once you walk in the Redemption that you have been reading about in the Bible, you will watch the LORD work in your life daily.

[allodial]

Private? Yes?

Exactly. AFAIK, if John Quincy lives on private land but says that he lives in the county, in "the city" (Metro?), in the State of XXX or in the United States such would be a lie--false witness against oneself is no good IMHO. Consider the word 'resident'. Someone getting out of medical school goes through so many years of residency until they get to the point that they belong there. If an immigrant goes through residency before citizenship then why are people equating citizenship and residency? I mean .... seriously.

And when he came into the house, Jesus anticipated him, saying, 'What thinkest thou, Simon? the kings of the earth -- from whom do they receive custom or poll-tax? from their sons or from the strangers?' Peter saith to him, 'From the strangers.' Jesus said to him, 'Then are the sons free; Matthew 17:25-26 (YLT)

He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. Matthew 17:25-26 (KJV)

He said, "Yes." When he came into the house, Jesus anticipated him, saying, "What do you think, Simon? From whom do the kings of the earth receive toll or tribute? From their children, or from strangers?" Peter said to him, "From strangers." Jesus said to him, "Therefore the children are exempt. Matthew 17:25-26 (Word English Bible)

Might proof of residency be evidence of oath of office for the resident?



Note the wording of the definition. The Englishman is not a resident of England but instead with respect to a polity that is alien, though subordinate, to England.

[Michael Joseph]

Once you walk in the Redemption that you have been reading about in the Bible, you will watch the LORD work in your life daily.

Amen.

Gal 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in flesh I live in faith of the Son of God, Who loved me, and gave up Himself for me.

Gal 2:21 I do not render useless the grace of God: for if righteousness come through law, then Christ died uselessly [for nothing].


He who surrenders to the Administration of the Holy Spirit in the name of Jesus Christ - lives under the Shadow [Direction] of the Almighty. Juxtapose that against living according to ego [man's Own]. Just take that Own up the mountain and be willing to put a knife to its throat - enter a substitute - for the lesser cannot redeem the greater.

For by the graces and mercy of the Lord is the creature transformed and resurrected in mind, spirit and body. But it is the work of God in the ONE LIFE. For if we beg that our life is apart from God then we are poly-theist. Being monotheist begs ONE LIFE.

[David Merrill]

Exactly why the images are saved to disk Allodial.

Now here is the home rule. - Consider when the home rule city gets so large that it covers the entire county. Now you have a municipal jurisdiction instead of a state jurisdiction. I have touched on this over the years but believe you have set me up so that a reader might actually get it.

LEVI - I Chronicles 6 - and now Hebron/NY Moscow/Tel Aviv etc. are all the same jurisdiction. This is how my "perpetual inheritance" through the 1629 Charter can actually manifest within that law boundary, and be proven out by precedent waiver of tort by NY CITY CODE. In lieu of proper bonding a bill becomes a true indictment. - A true bill against any official with a bogus oath who causes harm to the Lord's own.


P.S. Ask the rabbi;

If two men are floating past in the river, and you can save only one:

One is named Levi, and the other Melchizedek - which one do you save?