Citizenship, is this the reason they has to pass the 14th Amendment?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gavilan
    Senior Member
    • May 2012
    • 346

    #1

    Citizenship, is this the reason they has to pass the 14th Amendment?

    I came across Attorney General Bates opinion on citizenship you all may find very enlightening:




    Southern Slaves in Free State Courts: The Pamphlet Literature. New York: Garland, 1988. 3 Vols. 1,704 pp. With a New Introduction by Paul Finkelman. Reprinted 2007, 2013 by The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. Set ISBN-13: 9781584777380. Set ISBN-10:1584777389. Hardcover. New. 34 Pamphlets reprinted in fascimile, in 3 volumes, with a New Introduction by Paul Finkelman: 1. Francis Hargrave. An Argument in the Case of James Sommersett aNegro, Lately Determined by the Court of King's Bench: Wherein it is Attempted to Demonstrate the Present Unlawfulness of Domestic Slavery in England. To Which is Prefixed a State of the Case. London, 1772. 82pp. 2. Edward Long. Candid Reflections Upon the Judgement Lately Awarded by the Court of King's Bench, in Westminster-Hall, on What is Commonly Called the Negro Cause, by a Planter. London, 1772. 76 pp. 3. Britannia Libera, or a Defence of the Free State of Man in England, Against the Claim of Any Man There as a Slave. London, 1772. 47 pp.4. Samuel Estwick. Considerations on the Negro Cause Commonly so Called, Addressed to the Right Honorable Lord Mansfield. London, 1763. [96] pp.5. A Letter to Philo Africanus, Upon Slavery; In Answer to His of the 22nd of November, in the General Evening Post, Together With the Opinions of Sir John Strange, and Other Eminent Lawyers Upon This Subject, With the Sentence of Lord Mansfield, in the Case of Somerset and Knowles, 1772, With His Lordship's Explanation of That Opinion in 1786. London, 1788. 40 pp. 6. John Haggard. The Judgment of the Right Hon. Lord Stowell, Respecting the Slavery of the Mongrel Woman, Grace, On An Appeal From The Vice-Admirality Court of Antigua. London, 1827. [50] pp. 7. Considerations on Certain Remarks on the Negro Slavery and Abolition Questions, in Lord Stowell's Judgment in the Case of the Slave "Grace." By a Briton. Newcastle, 1827. 18 pp. 8. Case of the Slave-Child Med. Report of the Arguments of Counsel and of the Opinion of the Court, in the Case of Commonwealth vs. Aves;Tried and Determined in the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Boston, 1836. 40 pp. Please contact us for a complete list of titles contained in these three volumes. Originally published as a part of the series Slavery, Race, and the American Legal System, 1700-1872, this set contains facsimiles of 34 rare pamphlets relating to court cases involving the status of slaves in non-slave jurisdictions, including Somerset v. Stewart (1772) and Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). As in the companion set Fugitive Slaves and American Courts, some pamphlets were part of the public debate over judicial decisions. Others used a case to promote the antislavery cause or, in some instances, support or justify slavery.


    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fed.../370/case.html




    Ok, as linked above, I came across this opinion from Attorney General Bates where he is asked about a "colored" man in command of a ship if he was a citizen of the United States, previously Attorney General Wirt had the opinion that colored people could not be citizens of the United States.

    These are from Bates.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	citizenship.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	179.4 KB
ID:	47115
    Click image for larger version

Name:	color_people_us_citizens.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	252.2 KB
ID:	47116

    This is from Wirt
    Click image for larger version

Name:	opinion-attorney_general_wirt.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	202.0 KB
ID:	47117

    Click image for larger version

Name:	slaves_were_not_citizens.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	205.8 KB
ID:	47118

    The case Wirt cites is this:

    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fed.../370/case.html
    Last edited by Gavilan; 09-10-16, 03:03 PM. Reason: order of attachment
  • shikamaru
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 1630

    #2
    My opinion:

    They had to pass the 14th to get over the ruling of Scott v. Sanford (1857).

    There are levels to status:

    1) citizen
    2) denizen
    3) alien whether resident or foreign
    4) slave

    Condition refers to whether free or servile.

    Ultimately, this is about the opinions of some officers in some body corporate.

    Under the law of nature, all men are free. It is man's law that seeks to involuntarily subjugate another and then rationalize it as law (positive law), religion, philosophy, or whatever.
    Last edited by shikamaru; 09-10-16, 03:05 PM.

    Comment

    • Gavilan
      Senior Member
      • May 2012
      • 346

      #3
      Originally posted by shikamaru View Post
      My opinion:

      They had to pass the 14th to get over the ruling of Scott v. Sanford (1857).

      There are levels to status:

      1) citizen
      2) denizen
      3) alien whether resident or foreign
      4) slave

      Condition refers to whether free or servile.
      Read Bates opinion, he breaks it down for us. The case you cite was not novel, they had already ran into such issues previously.

      Comment

      • shikamaru
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2011
        • 1630

        #4
        Originally posted by Gavilan View Post
        Read Bates opinion, he breaks it down for us.
        1. These opinions are decades before the Dread Scott decision.
        2. An attorneys general of a State is an officer of the government of that State. Different states treated "people of color" differently given their prejudices and history.
        Last edited by shikamaru; 09-10-16, 03:18 PM.

        Comment

        • Gavilan
          Senior Member
          • May 2012
          • 346

          #5
          Originally posted by shikamaru View Post
          1. These opinions are decades before the Dread Scott decision.
          2. An attorneys general of a State is an officer of the government of that State. Different states treated "people of color" differently given their prejudices and history.
          That's right, which Bates explains therein.

          Comment

          • shikamaru
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2011
            • 1630

            #6
            Originally posted by Gavilan View Post
            That's right, which Bates explains therein.
            Which explains the Dread Scott decision decades later to standardize the law across the several States which leads to the Civil War and ultimately the 14th Amendment to overturn that Supreme Court ruling.

            Comment

            • Gavilan
              Senior Member
              • May 2012
              • 346

              #7
              Originally posted by shikamaru View Post
              Which explains the Dread Scott decision decades later to standardize the law across the several States which leads to the Civil War and ultimately the 14th Amendment to overturn that Supreme Court ruling.
              Yep, that's what I was thinking. But you know, it didn't overturned the ruling, that ruling is still law.

              Comment

              • shikamaru
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2011
                • 1630

                #8
                Originally posted by Gavilan View Post
                Yep, that's what I was thinking. But you know, it didn't overturned the ruling, that ruling is still law.
                My understanding is that Supreme Court rulings can be overturned by constitutional amendment which is what we have here.

                Comment

                • Gavilan
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2012
                  • 346

                  #9
                  Originally posted by shikamaru View Post
                  My understanding is that Supreme Court rulings can be overturned by constitutional amendment which is what we have here.
                  Here is a link to the case. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fed.../393/case.html

                  I am short of time at the moment, but I will see if we can discuss this further a bit later.

                  Comment

                  • shikamaru
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 1630

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Gavilan View Post
                    Here is a link to the case. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fed.../393/case.html

                    I am short of time at the moment, but I will see if we can discuss this further a bit later.
                    If this is still law, where is this law practiced in these United States?

                    Comment

                    • Gavilan
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2012
                      • 346

                      #11
                      Originally posted by shikamaru View Post
                      If this is still law, where is this law practiced in these United States?
                      Are you talking about slavery? or Citizenship?

                      Comment

                      • shikamaru
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2011
                        • 1630

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Gavilan View Post
                        Are you talking about slavery? or Citizenship?
                        Citizenship.

                        Slavery has been transmuted into voluntary servitude and incarceration. That affects all people in these United States. Some of the aforementioned affects some more than others disproportionately.
                        Last edited by shikamaru; 09-11-16, 12:53 PM.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X