Courts Holding a Person’s Right To Due Process Hostage for Money is a Crime!

[Sovereignty]

If this is in the wrong forum...please move.
(From an email from YRIITL)

Move One:Move Two:Move Three:Move Four:Move Five:propertyMove Six:property The pawn is informed by our player that the pawn is attempting to deprive the player of their property without the benefit of due process of law or a trial, and that such an act is expressly forbidden by the Constitution of the United States of America.

Move Seven: By this point, the vast majority of pawns will have admitted defeat by dropping any demand for extortion money and granting the player a trial. If the pawn has not acquiesced at this point, then the player should apply even more pressure on the pawn. The player does so by informing the pawn, that due to their having violated their oath of office by violating the rights of the player, they have legally forfeited any presumption of immunity from personal civil law suit should the player decide to bring suit against them.

The last movewww.ticketslayer.com


[1] Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America

[2] Due Process Clause

[3] Incorporation Doctrine

[Darkcrusade]

But do you have a money back guarantee?

http://www.escape-tickets-irs-court.org/index.html

One man said to the court, "The Constitution says "No State shall make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts", but this court constantly Does, so this court must not be "The State". If you are not "the State", Who the Hell are you people?" Court said, "Case Dismissed", "record sealed".

Another man, told them "I am not a "subject" of the British Crown, and the Court Rules and State Codes are "Copyrighted", and I do Not have permission to use them, therefore the Prosecution cannot use them against me." - "case dismissed", "record sealed".

Another man was ORDERED to get an Attorney before the next HEARING
date or he would be put in jail. The date arrived, and the Judge said, "Well do o have an attorney?" The man said "Judge, I tried, but I couldn't find an attorney who was qualified and willing to take my case, who was not an "Esquire". "Case Dismissed" , "Record Sealed"

Steven Ames' (of Harrisburg, Pensylvania) Father denied that he was a British "Subject". The Judge said "You prove you are Not one."

The reason that the Court "seals the records", seems to be that they (Judges/Lawyers) do NOT want the knowledge to get out:

1. that the Courts-are NOT Courts of Law, but Courts of " "Subject" Code Behavior Administration".

2. that the Courts are Not Courts of the State government (with separation of powers), but "private meetings" of "Lawyers" only.

3. that all "Lawyers", and therefore all "Judges", are "Esquire" - a "Title of Nobility" granted by the British Crown, via InterNational Bar- Lawyer organization of London, England.

4. that all these "Private courts" use "private copyrighted" Court Rules" and published private "Codes", copyrighted by England.

5. that the Lawyer-Courts ignore "State Law" and also "State Code", if
and when it suits their purpose - their purpose is Courts convened in
the "interests of Justice". (Justice = collection of "just amount" of
"presumed debt").

6. that the courts' purpose is to collect from and administer behavior of "Debtors" to the British Crown, without The People knowing that they are serfs/vassals/slaves on the British Crown's Colony titled "United States" (fiction) and/or one of its member corporation fiction States.

7 that all Courts are "Military Occupation" Courts of the British Crown, per Treaties.

8. that the American People are actually "slaves of Feudalism" by the

British Crown per Treaties, and always have been,- and under the feudal
Law of ENGLAND through the language of modern STATUTE Law. The
Constitution was a "Con" from the start

http://www.peoples-rights.com/doc15England.htm

[Sovereignty]

So, which one of those 'remedies' will work for me?

[shikamaru]

The posting of this "bail" is surety for the hearing.

This has been done before, historically .