The Seven-Headed Dragon: World Commerce

[David Merrill]

If you lend money to My people, to the poor among you, you are not to act as a creditor to him; you shall not charge him interest. Exodus 22:25 NAS

At the end of every seven years you shall grant a remission of debts. Deut. 15:1 NAS

Interesting. I must tell that guy I loaned $ to long ago he owes me nothing. Here's the entire series:

Pt. 1: "The Serpent Indebted Me"

Pt. 2: Torah And Debt Release

Pt. 3: Debt, Exile, And The Prophet Daniel

Pt. 4: How The Pharisees Abused Debtors

Pt. 5: His Public Ministry Began With Debt Forgiveness

Pt. 6: Jesus Makes Debt Forgiveness Central To Prayer

Pt. 7: Israel Ignored Jubilee Law

I grabbed a look at PT 7:

Why would Israel always have the poor with them? As God warned them in Deuteronomy 15 (see discussion in earlier column), they would do so because they would not obey him, with emphasis on debt remission. Again, this may read as odd to modern Christian eyes, which are not nearly as immersed in Old Testament texts as Jesus and his listeners. Our interpretive framework tends to focus on heart attitudes and personal salvation, whereas 1st century Israel was aflame with outrage about the lack of debt relief and with frenzied expectation about the coming Messiah and the promise that he would proclaim liberty to the (debt) captives.

Jesus was right. They would not obey and the poor would always be with them. In fact, the failure to obey God in this matter ended up setting in motion a series of events which plunged the whole region into poverty.

And something Xparte said too:

The wondrous thing about the Holy Bible is that no one today, or even yesterday, can know for certain what the author was thinking or his motivation or even his purpose in what he wrote He lifted it from Most interpretations of the written word ignore the contemporaneous historical background as if there were no socio-religious-politico factors which propelled the author to make his statements.

Based in the Priory Chancellor (Colchester = Camelot = bent light) and how it feels against my intuition I feel it is important to point out how definition juxtaposition will confuse even the most intelligent Bible scholar.

Israel is the Ten Northern Tribes or what is called Samaria, as in Good Samaritan; to the New Covenant Christian. And what is Israel is actually Judah, where we found Jerusalem. We tend to think that Jerusalem was ever a capital city when even today the Capital is Tel Aviv, what was once Tyre.



Also from PT 7 we find a major Key:

7 a woman came to Him with an alabaster vial of very costly perfume, and she poured it upon His head as He reclined at the table.

Jesus not only subjected himself to John, he was anointed by a High Priestess. So I am not bashing the Bible one bit. It reveals a lot. Like for one Tribe, Benjamin that remained loyal to Judaism (none of the Old Testament was put to writing before 600 BC; Nebuchadnezzar, who invented the Jew) there were Ten Tribes to the north, who all preferred a much more balanced blend of worship.

Therefore I can finish my point about "lifting" with some poetry. How can the poem be mine, even if I did not write it? The poet stole from me and the remedy (forgiveness) is waiver of tort - like the Bill of Exchange. Billing instead of prosecuting. It makes my point about John-ism and how it has been suppressed in King Omri's vilified daughter Jezebel and the Popes campaigns against the Cathars etc. Persecutions against the Isian sex cults, Golden Calf imagery. See John 21:11 about how prosperous it is to fish from the right hemisphere of the brain - the Divine Feminine.

I cannot leave alone the point that the page is "lifted" from material that never was published. One might ask Israel about it, but I suspect that pointing out the truth about vassal Israel is very unpopular with both Jews and Christians. I complimented Israel about this Find and he directed me to his published works. So my suspicion is that money prevailed, he toned down the truth for popularity sake.

[Michael Joseph]

2Co 11:3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.

beguiledG1818

G1818
exapatao
ex-ap-at-ah'-o
From G1537 and G538; to seduce wholly: - beguile, deceive.

2Co 11:2 For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.

Chaste Virgin = undefiled maiden

==================

Is the writer of Corinthians using a sexual allegory of the Garden to disguise the interaction between the objective mind and the subjective mind in relation to the superconscious mind? Me thinks yes! This allegory does shed light upon spiritual homosexuality and adultery.

But even more than that, it seems when the Ideal Man which is Christ forms in the consciousness of mankind, then is it now time to put down the books [ideals of other men] and begin to live? Is not the Mare the sea? Is not the Virgin the I AM who may intercourse with Self for what else is there but the Self of I AM? And thru this intercourse conceive? Is not the entire universe then an immaculate conception?

Is not the subjective mind likened unto a field? And what then of the seeds? Are these not the thoughts/desires of the objective mind? Who then is said to lend to another in the light of such allegory? And wouldn't the burden of usury be as making, forming, molding one into the image of another? For thoughts are things and these thoughts understand matter.

Should the objective mind be able to throw out the beliefs which compromise [money changers] from our temple mind, then can the Christ Consciousness be formed within. Is not the forming of one into my own personal image akin to spiritual murder? Would we not all be better served if the Image of Christ was our own? Do we not miserably fall when we place another man at our head? Is this not the lesson of 1st Samuel 8?

Israel is a State under a Flag - it represents an Ideal way of Living! The ideal taking root in the soil bed of the minds of the People is like the seed which is sown in a field. The People are like the womb which receive and conceive said seed to bring forth the new Child [State].

Is not the King's Dominion called a Kingdom? Then is not the entire Kingdom in the King? Do not all estates flow from his Throne? Isn't the Kingdom as a State conceived upon an ideal way of living? A conscious observer is required to manifest the State!

Consider a "rock star" what is he without fans? A wanna be rock star? He must sow his seed into the minds of observers and they must conceive his stardom. Who created his stardom? He or his fans [people]? Neither! God granted this one the ideal to exercise his gifts, for we live, move and have our being in God. Therefore give God the glory in Spirit and in Truth. For there is but One.

What of a State? Isn't the creation of State not of the same principle? What then of the Courts? Are these not priests ministering at the temple altar?

I asked a scientist where did the ideal of a "big bang" derive? He was at a loss. Therefore, I was unwilling to accept his theory for it is flawed upon secondary causes and dismisses primary cause! Does not the Earth require the Sun? Can the Earth bring forth any plant without the Sun's loving rays?

Does not the Sun give both warmth and light - love and wisdom? What then of the Earth can boast of itself? Nothing! For all is in need of another! Should an Earthly creature then think to form, fashion, mold or create another Earthly creation into its own image? Is this not as charging usury upon the sharing of what was granted by the Universal GodHead?

They did put those fig leaves over their groin right? Just checking. Does not a man sown his seed thru his groin and does not a woman receive his seed thru her groin? Clearly we can see now wives [subconscious mind] submit yourselves to your husband [conscious mind] for this is right IN THE LORD.

Act 17:28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.

I glory in your wealth and by the law of reciprocity in Mind, I am wealthy.

[David Merrill]

I was watching a YouTube documentary about the brain recently. The Introduction spoke first of "consciousness arising" and then the "development of consciousness". Right then I knew I was wasting my time but continued anyway. It is the universe arising and developing out of consciousness. Without time there is no use pursuing the first cause.

I asked a scientist where did the ideal of a "big bang" derive? He was at a loss. Therefore, I was unwilling to accept his theory for it is flawed upon secondary causes and dismisses primary cause!

I keep finding a primary truth in my, "The first mistake a crop circle investigator makes is presuming that the crop circle is real."

I like it more and more. I believe more so that our social injury was in polarizing Creationism against Evolution. We are brought up with a biased perspective that in itself disallows science.

Where does thought begin? It begins to be more obvious that consciousness arises from thought. Mind is the All - the universe is mental. But then I have developed proven the Grand Unified Theory (GUT) so that it is no longer theory, no longer hypothesis - it is now law. Always was.

This enabled me to walk through the neurochemistry.

Is anybody getting that? As we approach dawn, when we arise into "reality" the DMT, the endogenous psychedelic hallucinogen peaks. We dream ourselves awake after witching hour when melatonin stops dreaming in general, restful deep sleep. Years of waking in the witching hour to work may have given me the edge here.

The point being that Camelot means bent light. The priest was even named COLOUMBE. In time light seems to go forever in a strait line, in a vacuum. In time. So imagine how much mental energy it takes to bend a ray of light into one hydrogen valence shell? That is just one hydrogen atom too! Now imagine creating a universe... Like that. That is what is already going on.

The Trading with the Enemy Act was omitted from the bankers' code in 2016, by design:



But it reminds me of John LENNON's Christmas Carol, the ending chorus; War is over, if you want it...

[xparte]

They would not obey and the poor would always be with them. In fact, the failure to obey God in this matter ended up setting in motion a series of events which plunged the whole region into poverty."Laws of Commerce" are shown to be a specific body of Codes which authorize the Administration of Compelling Force in Efforts to uphold Contracts, mostly < mostly for Payments of Debts. The ancient Babylonian Priests were involved because Contracts were deemed to be a form of "Oath" thou shouldn't swear a bond entered into by the contracting parties; & the approval of the Gods were invoked so as to more effectively legitimize the entire process in the minds & the consciences of the contracting parties & all public witnesses ESTATE CITIZENS . Well that priestly government told the rich and the poor what Gods approved. worship the coin or Trust a the living God Shekel up. Christ took his office He said the one True God has a verbal contract its written within the redemption is a forgiveness for the rich and poor. Priests were involved because Contracts were deemed to be a form of "Oath" .how contemporaneous is that oath depending on historical socio-religious-politico factors cotempt for vacant office is the redemption . both spiritual and physical IMO.
These Babylonian Religious Codes recognized the ability the ability to buy & sell contracts between merchants in "Commerce". They bought & sold "slaves & the souls of men" in the time of Christ, & before & after. People were not recognized as people there under, but were items in Commerce. The Slave could be arrested for not showing up for work on time.

[David Merrill]

They would not obey and the poor would always be with them. In fact, the failure to obey God in this matter ended up setting in motion a series of events which plunged the whole region into poverty."Laws of Commerce" are shown to be a specific body of Codes which authorize the Administration of Compelling Force in Efforts to uphold Contracts, mostly < mostly for Payments of Debts. The ancient Babylonian Priests were involved because Contracts were deemed to be a form of "Oath" thou shouldn't swear a bond entered into by the contracting parties; & the approval of the Gods were invoked so as to more effectively legitimize the entire process in the minds & the consciences of the contracting parties & all public witnesses ESTATE CITIZENS . Well that priestly government told the rich and the poor what Gods approved. worship the coin or Trust a the living God Shekel up. Christ took his office He said the one True God has a verbal contract its written within the redemption is a forgiveness for the rich and poor. Priests were involved because Contracts were deemed to be a form of "Oath" .how contemporaneous is that oath depending on historical socio-religious-politico factors cotempt for vacant office is the redemption . both spiritual and physical IMO.
These Babylonian Religious Codes recognized the ability the ability to buy & sell contracts between merchants in "Commerce". They bought & sold "slaves & the souls of men" in the time of Christ, & before & after. People were not recognized as people there under, but were items in Commerce. The Slave could be arrested for not showing up for work on time.

Thank you Xparte;

Even after the Sumarian Ostraca phonetic alphabet (destruction of the Tower of Babel) Babylon was a magnificent place indeed.

In my head at least I am finding the Knights Templar and the Crown Templar Society of interest, in pursuit of the active current Principal behind the CODE. - The capitonym SO HELP ME GOD, uttered by George WASHINGTON.

The Van Pelt Milestone is displayed with George WASHINGTON's exhibit even today.

[David Merrill]

To refresh your memory of the oath process in 1789 this should also tie well with GARDNER's exposition:

[xparte]

A lawful oath consists in calling upon God, the occasion being of sufficient seriousness and importance,no actors private persons in full capacity to witness the truth of what we affirm as true, or our voluntary assumption of an obligation to do something in the future-with an implied imprecation of God's not the Gods disfavor if we lie or prove unfaithful to our engagements. This last is generally expressed by the phrase forming the concluding part of the formula of most oaths, "So help me God;"-i.e., Let God so help me as I have told the truth, or as I will keep my promise.
Hence an oath is an act of supreme religious worship, since it recognizes the omnipresence, omniscience, absolute justice and sovereignty of a living Person whose august that respected and impressive.witness is invoked, and whose judgment is appealed to as final. A private person can be all the So help me nots understanding or standing under Gods equivalent to that of worshipping a false god if we swear by any other than the only true and living God; and a sin of idolatry if we swear by any thing or place, although it be associated with the true God.This principle is fully recognized in Scripture. We are told to swear by the true God: "Unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear," Isa. Persons entering on public offices are also often obliged to make oath that they will faithfully execute their trust What do Trustees administer? A trust? The Constitution is a trust, It was created by the 1783 Treaty,
correct? It is not the private man's trust contract, Only those entering into the contract are UNDER the
constitution and are bound by it, correct? Look up the definition of "under" in words and phrases and a good
dictionary such as Webster's 1828 at Vol. II, 101. I, my dear readers, am not "under" some damn corporate trust
(constitution) drafted in secrecy by the King and corporate lawyer esquires (you call them the "Founding Fathers")
whom were controlled by the Treaty of 1213, wherein the Vatican still ruled over all. It was never "my
constitution" and never will be. The Constitution does not apply to me nor will it ever.
However, some of the states' representatives in 1776 realized that the Constitution was a commercial contract
among the Founding Fathers to protect their financial interests in the Americas and in Europe. The Articles of the
Bill of Rights is designed to keep those United States citizens whom are bound by the Constitution (contract) from
encroaching upon my natural Law Rights,

State and Estate come from the same contract.A natural-person is defined as "A human being that has the capacity for rights and duties". Note that the word capacity means the ability, but not the obligation for rights and duties. One must make obligatory a private persons capacity.Artificial persons and gods for public entertainment There are many different types of artificial-persons, each with different duties. Here are a few different types of artificial-persons:

Taxpayer, Resident, Driver, Voter, Citizen, Homeowner, Officer. Banker cop politicians clergy all the its we and you,s but certainly not me how far Men and women are outside Statute Law unless they contract to be within them. Then, those humans who agree to be bound by Statute Law are only involved when reference is made to a natural person (a human within those laws). The other non-humans are artificial persons (sometimes called "fake persons" by judges). How do u get a Honorable Office out of the Dead

[xparte]

"Seek not the law in your scriptures, for the law is life, whereas the scripture is dead. persons are dead in law written are the laws of Men but writing has to be corporate . I could be off but my Babylonian secular self thinks Christ made it as plain as Hell.