Banishment on Motla68 Lifted.

[David Merrill]

The reasoning being that my reason for banishing Motla68 has been explained clearly several times. Motla68's explanation of the functioning verbiage on the Presentment, when he finally explained it, excluded the remedy that this Website, in my opinion is founded on.

However, Motla68 said many interesting things and brought a lot of stimulating conversation about canon law and 1861 vestigial martial law, so if he will have us, great. I do not expect things to be pleasant with the dynamic already between us but I do expect the reading to be more edifying and entertaining around here than without him.


With that said...

[motla68]

Hello everyone, I was just informed today that the banned was lifted. I missed it in my busy schedule somehow. I would like to thank all of you who supported this decision, quite pleasing to hear that the seeds I planted before had such great impact in conversation here. Hope you all can accept my apologies if I have offended anyone in here personally. A couple of you did have some very intelligent thought put into your posts.

I hope you all can understand that my reappearance here for many reasons will not be in representation of Coresource Solution or any success as a group so please do not throw back in my face anything posted in the past, if you want to know more about this group then contact me privately at your own free will. With that my replies will just be to give of pure knowledge and experience to share, I am not here to teach anyone, you must accept full liability for what is received, if you learn something it is your fault, if you do not learn something it is still your own fault, please keep criticism at bay and I will do the same. Ask a question or make comment on that thread or post directly, not for some post on another thread somewhere else, stay focused.
Also on my part will try to respect the rules of brain trust here and give further explanation and the "show me" style of posting.

Have a blessed day and thanks again.

[Michael Joseph]

welcome back. Now get to work!

[motla68]

welcome back. Now get to work!

yes sir, lol

[Treefarmer]

Good, I'm glad we've been able to come to a mature solution here.
I believe we can all get along fine.

I look forward to intelligent discussions.

Blessings

[David Merrill]

I am glad you have come back Motla68. While I found your teasing about the verbiage on the presentment infuriating I can live with that. It was when you left off the - or exchanged for [lawful money]Emergency was lifted in 1976. However on the second page we find stipulations restricting that lifting. The stipulation provides that the President or Secretary can declare a Bankers' Holiday95a and 95b. That pre-approved power given the President and Secretary is the manifestation of the 1861 martial law, now martial rule but present only in banking and over citizens of the US in contract with the Fed through endorsement; effectively people as Fed banks.

The only scientific method to prove canon law - robin egg-blue paper wrappers and the application of peaceful envoy, removing yourself from the battlefield so to speak by citing Lieber Code are effective is to avoid using the more applicable remedy - found in current law. As long as you use both, then I say it is the modern remedy found in current law at play.

[motla68]

The past is history and I come back trying to start back with a clean slate here, bringing all this up sure does not make that easy.
There was a couple times where things stopped working for some reason, so we searched for a new strategy to get the ball rolling again and it did, so we changed some things, that is all I am going to say about that.

I am not going to Teach, make claims of what made it work or try to prove anything any more, my theory is going to remain my private business. All am going to do is Show what was done and how we did it, from there you can make your own interpretations and conclusions, what one learns or does not learned, what is followed up on with due diligence or not is in the eye of the beholder. I find it fruitless to try and break through some peoples EGO when they have already made up their own mind of how something played out.

There has been some new developments lately that I heard of where the only thing put on the presentment was the name type written in capital letters was put on the presentment followed by a colon and then just put " Property of the State". This was allegedly done on hospital bills, I will spare any details until we can get a sanitized version of the presentment and results.
Also I am waiting on replies my self from a couple state registrars of some direct questions pertaining to the name held in trust and the usufructuary that appears to be in place.

[David Merrill]

The past is history and I come back trying to start back with a clean slate here, bringing all this up sure does not make that easy.
There was a couple times where things stopped working for some reason, so we searched for a new strategy to get the ball rolling again and it did, so we changed some things, that is all I am going to say about that.

I am not going to Teach, make claims of what made it work or try to prove anything any more, my theory is going to remain my private business. All am going to do is Show what was done and how we did it, from there you can make your own interpretations and conclusions, what one learns or does not learned, what is followed up on with due diligence or not is in the eye of the beholder. I find it fruitless to try and break through some peoples EGO when they have already made up their own mind of how something played out.

There has been some new developments lately that I heard of where the only thing put on the presentment was the name type written in capital letters was put on the presentment followed by a colon and then just put " Property of the State". This was allegedly done on hospital bills, I will spare any details until we can get a sanitized version of the presentment and results.
Also I am waiting on replies my self from a couple state registrars of some direct questions pertaining to the name held in trust and the usufructuary that appears to be in place.

Yes. My banishing you was a painful decision to make. I have moved this over to your thread - http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...ull=1#post1987

As Treefarmer pointed out - my banishing you was shameful on the face of this new website. The Quatlosers took the expected advantage of it too - to make me sound like a tyrant. Like I have said above, it is both edifying and entertaining to have you back. I am certain I will get to the bottom of your fixation that the effective remedy is pre-1913, as you indicate in the above quoted post. My journal to getting there will in itself be edifying; which of course, upon the Thank You posts, bolsters my ego even more!



Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S. You all should be aware that while I enjoy being thanked - doing it on a PM is mildly annoying as if I want to share it, removing your name, that just makes me look even more narcissistic. Please; if you want to thank me, do it in front of everybody. Otherwise I honestly don't need the ego boost.

[Mark Christopher]

Guten Morgen mein Fuhrer,
Danke schon David, sorry had to do it seeing the tyrant comment! (BTW David your genuine commitment to the material and subject shows through and I believe no shame has been brought...it is all a process) We all make mistakes that is one of the great things of being human. But it appears we came out of it being bettter for it. The balance is restored.

Welcome back Motla68, its a beautiful new day.
Be Well
Mark

[David Merrill]

I am still having trouble accepting it as a mistake. Hopefully Motla68 is confident enough to keep posting even with my rigorous evaluations of his attachments. That is very edifying for me anyway.

If he cannot handle my evaluation then I accept that as confirmation I am correct. I hope that people are reading my posts carefully enough to understand my perspective in light of the namesake of the Website - that the 1913 Congress had to write remedy in to the Fed Act because of the 'Saving to Suitors' Clause of 1789.

[Mark Christopher]

- that the 1913 Congress had to write remedy in to the Fed Act because of the 'Saving to Suitors' Clause of 1789.

There are no mistakes...only happy accidents. The powers that be are always finding new ways to teach us.

And note when you say it like that (the quote from above) you just connected a bunch of dots for me. Another happy accident.
Be Well
Mark Christopher.

[David Merrill]

I hope Motla 68 is here to stay. He has a lot of links that will be helpful. Quite a bit about Lieber Code and its effects up through the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act for example. On the other hand, vestigial canon law goes back to Paul forming the Roman Welfare State that is still effective under Christendom.

I want to hear more. He brought out a great example of redeeming lawful money but failed to even show is clearly the verbiage on the example image, and even attributed its success to be a mistake and fluke. So there I went off again...

There is so much - so many dots to connect! I am glad people still find learning around here fun.

[motla68]

Go right on ahead evaluating, I am looking at this with a new prospective that I would rather have some evaluation even if driven by ego then not to have any evaluation at all.

David Merril: vestigial canon law goes back to Paul forming the Roman Welfare State that is still effective under Christendom.

I see your picking up pieces to the puzzle here and there and you do not even know it, this is where the self teaching and learning come in.
Maybe MJ had a hand in that since I was on here last, who knows?

I do not look at life in absolutes, it is conscience that the majority of people have free will to create their own destiny.
" You will be amazed about what you can do and how well you can do it " - Peaceful Warrior

http://youtu.be/U5XAd2zDvzg

Yep, learning can be fun, so shut off that big engine and hoist a sail now and then that there could be more going on then what meets the eye. Sometimes we need to learn to wake up the third eye. We are alive, not dead pieces of paper. At least I do not interpret my skin to be paper anyway.

[David Merrill]

I prefer to think that by "ego" you mean the remedy as it has been written into the law:

I had a fright that kept me up part of the night though. Somebody showed me a $5K-style frivolous bill from the IRS. I was reminded this morning though that the penalty stemmed from Pete HENDRICKSON's Cracking the Code system of Zero Income Return.

[motla68]

Ego is this estate of knowledge we have built up in our head that we have spent so much time investing in, this estate then becomes sentimental to us and very difficult to let go, it also acts as a defensive tool when we believe someone is wrong and has the manifestation in appearance to be in controversy to the estate of knowledge holding sentiment. Believe me I understand, had to go through this myself, once crossed over from what I was doing before I knew then the trash had to be taken out of my head.
Not sure if you remember, but I wrote up a post to what one would say in court with what our study group knows which runs parallel to a lot of things found in Libel in Review. The intent was not to take away from Libel in Review, but make it a stronger tool. Also remember me saying that I try to live with no absolutes, it is got me this far, moved into this area back in August of 2004, on the way my vehicle broke down and I pulled into Raleigh with a little more then $50 in my pocket and I am still here, I don't think would have made it if my world was filled with absolutes.

I have had many of long nights too, when we were all first putting this stuff together.