David, could you satiate my curiosity what happened to the bond company in your case?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gavilan
    Senior Member
    • May 2012
    • 352

    #1

    David, could you satiate my curiosity what happened to the bond company in your case?

    Where they tried for you to take a mental examination and the judge dissolved the bond company? I don't quite recall the particulars, yet I am still curious how you were able to put them in check mate.
  • David Merrill
    Administrator
    • Mar 2011
    • 5950

    #2
    Originally posted by Gavilan View Post
    Where they tried for you to take a mental examination and the judge dissolved the bond company? I don't quite recall the particulars, yet I am still curious how you were able to put them in check mate.
    Dissolving the bond; I call bond-dodging. This is done by altering the oath of office.

    This is better understood by comprehending the Masonic symbols on Colorado. And then knowing that Colorado never formed properly a territory in 1861 and so the State is still a war chest, even after the war has ended. The Trading with the Enemy Act has been omitted from the Bankers' CODE, as of Jubilee - 2016. But more to your point here we have Rectification of Judiciary. Here is some more detail.


    The oaths became more and more deviant from the above form of oath. But they started with the third judge on the "psychological evaluation as an arraignment tool" case. The first, the Chief Judge cancelled my $20M performance but since I showed up the bill is outstanding. The second judge recused immediately and the third, David A. GILBERT swore out a phony oath and was the one you refer too, who tried to destroy my mind. But I would not consent and kept audio recordings. I showed up at the psychologist/neurologist at the ordered time but he wanted me to sign consent forms. I told him I was there by court order, my consent was a null issue.

    I told him he was ordered by the court to conduct a psychological evaluation which he refused to do, ordering me to leave his office. He was in contempt, not me. But he lied and I could prove it because I had the audio recording.

    I call it the Olympus Ordeal, which is what I consider "my case" rather than the rant of a fake judge. I fashioned notice through PACER served on Colorado USDC evidence repositories that fashioned pressure to reform the Form of Oath.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Form of Oath bill HB 18-1138 Colorado 7 24 18 passed TRUSTEE.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	246.0 KB
ID:	44883

    Resulting in the Secretary of State publication:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Form of Oath 2019 New.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	147.2 KB
ID:	44884

    I am reluctant to call this check mate, as you put it, because the Secretary of State is not enforcing that "judges" must use the form provided. They still get to fashion their own form, rather than to check their choice on the form required by law to use.

    The witness is crucial in any oath or affirmation. An affirmation must be witnessed by a proper judge and so they can play a game where the seeker of judiciary must then request the oath of the witness, from the SoS and COVID-19 has that office shut down. We have found one judicial officer apparently - Steven Leon BERNARD - the chief justice at the court of appeals. But we need LOBE's oath to confirm. That is in the works. There are two suitors' appeals before BERNARD and the tribunals are disqualified by deviant oaths.

    Administrative government cannot exist without judicial oversight and so it makes sense that it would come out of the court of appeals. However it is sad so see that BERNARD may be it. Considering Colorado's historical role in fiat currency this might mean that in all the world BERNARD is it - the judicial oversight. We (a suitor) requested he order two oaths from the SoS in the name and interest of justice, and he did. Otherwise the SoS is stalled out, blaming COVID-19. We will see if BERNARD will order the oath on his own witness, to his own oath?

    I consider it more end game, than checkmate.
    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
    www.bishopcastle.us
    www.bishopcastle.mobi

    Comment

    • Gavilan
      Senior Member
      • May 2012
      • 352

      #3
      David, I called checkmate because no matter their move they had to concede the fact that you brought to light their corruption and had to follow the proper procedure, guess we still have to see what will come of it.

      Comment

      • David Merrill
        Administrator
        • Mar 2011
        • 5950

        #4
        Originally posted by Gavilan View Post
        David, I called checkmate because no matter their move they had to concede the fact that you brought to light their corruption and had to follow the proper procedure, guess we still have to see what will come of it.
        That is what I meant too. It feels as though BERNARD is pressed into making a monumental decision - soon. Endgame.
        www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
        www.bishopcastle.us
        www.bishopcastle.mobi

        Comment

        • David Merrill
          Administrator
          • Mar 2011
          • 5950

          #5
          My case was abated in 2004 but the prosecutor revived it in 2009, after nearly five years. So it had no chance at all had I run to any attorney. I am explaining this so you understand that David A. GILBERT was senior prosecutor during my Senior Citizen days when I confused that terminology with redemption. First note the collusion into racketeering by the Chief "Judge" SAMELSON.




          Now for bond-dodging pioneer David A GILBERT:

          Click image for larger version

Name:	oath 1 01.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	167.7 KB
ID:	44885

          Click image for larger version

Name:	oath 1 05.jpg
Views:	5
Size:	179.2 KB
ID:	44886

          Pay special attention to the term for GILBERT. He was properly bonded for a six year term but renewed his oath with a deviant bond-dodge in criminal syndicalism in four, corresponding to contemplation of breaking the law - prosecuting a redeemed man - contemptuous of me being widely known a Sovereign Citizen.
          www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
          www.bishopcastle.us
          www.bishopcastle.mobi

          Comment

          • Michael Joseph
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2011
            • 1596

            #6
            Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
            Pay special attention to the term for GILBERT. He was properly bonded for a six year term but renewed his oath with a deviant bond-dodge in criminal syndicalism in four, corresponding to contemplation of breaking the law - prosecuting a redeemed man - contemptuous of me being widely known a Sovereign Citizen.
            The only sovereign citizen is those wearing a badge and a black dress.
            The blessing is in the hand of the doer. Faith absent deeds is dead.

            Lawful Money Trust Website

            Divine Mind Community Call - Sundays 8pm EST

            ONE man or woman can make a difference!

            Comment

            • lorne
              Banned
              • Apr 2015
              • 310

              #7
              Originally posted by Cheryl Marie
              Judges who take an oath ending in IN GOD WE TRUST properly indicate they are bonded in commerce to act on those individual CQVT trusts to write orders, but they must also recognize the to bond such orders.
              I'm thinking you meant to say ... SO HELP ME GOD.

              Comment

              • David Merrill
                Administrator
                • Mar 2011
                • 5950

                #8
                Originally posted by lorne View Post
                I'm thinking you meant to say ... SO HELP ME GOD.
                Thanks Lorne; nice Catch. I like when folks pay attention to the detail.

                Originally posted by Michael Joseph View Post
                The only sovereign citizen is those wearing a badge and a black dress.
                I am presuming you mean Star Chamber. This is also trustee of the resulting trust.

                The baser interpretation would be that whoever holds the force gets to be king. He who wears the robe is judge de facto in command of the sheriff. We have a suitor like that. He dealt in guns for a living and when contesting a foreclosure challenged the "judge" jurisdiction. The judge sent him out of her courtroom and so he was headed for the clerks office to conclude business and the sheriff deputies arrested him for contempt, pretending the judge had the authority to send him from the courthouse, not her courtroom.

                Sooner than try staying out of prison for the phony felony charges he gave up his business dealing guns. He kept saying, She will throw me in prison.

                The Star Chamber had execution right over the sovereign.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	Star Chamber 1500.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	194.3 KB
ID:	44888

                But that does not mean there is nothing to be learned from the Michael DOUGLAS movie by that name.

                Timing tells me that the thread is brought up regarding my patent. Something I have always pondered is how I managed never to directly Refuse for Cause Robert J. BRYAN for his oath:

                Click image for larger version

Name:	Oath BRYAN R4C.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	226.8 KB
ID:	44889

                It sure looks like I did; maybe the clerk removed it from the Doc? Look how there are no PACER markings.

                All in all though when it came to publishing the Notice of Misdeed regarding the Trust, how the phony process never effected the irrevocable trust, the Doc(s) were published by BRYAN from chambers. Like the clerk is not familiar with the law. So I see why I have not "recused" or otherwise rejected his de facto authority but it seems logical I would have been conscious of it at the time in 2017.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	Oath McGOVERN R4C.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	206.6 KB
ID:	44890

                The journey is truly amazing!!
                Attached Files
                Last edited by David Merrill; 10-28-20, 01:04 AM.
                www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                www.bishopcastle.us
                www.bishopcastle.mobi

                Comment

                • David Merrill
                  Administrator
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 5950

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Cheryl Marie
                  operate as a 14th Amendment citizen of the United Statesintended third-party beneficiaries. People themselves bond their energy as to their own societal standing. Judges who take an oath ending in IN GOD WE TRUST properly indicate they are bonded in commerce to act on those individual CQVT trusts to write orders, but they must also recognize the from withinall Intervenorher recognition of the operation of the Fed Act. I did so because the Chief Justice must direct the State Admin Office to assign a competent and impartial officer to my cause. This current assigned judge is the second one that the SCAO assigned to preside. I disqualified the previous one for trying to conscript me into his commerce jurisdiction.
                  I read through it twice and commend you for such a concise perception. The CQV trust is plain to you and English nearly fails for you.

                  So that typo could be either way, upon perspective.

                  Extraordinary!


                  That is the essence of Doc 6, in the Patent Repository. The R4C on the Letter is on its way, I hear:


                  https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction_input


                  9500 1130 2198 0301 3226 75
                  Tracking Report on R4C 9500 1130 2198 0301 3226 75.pdf

                  It sounds as though you, Cheryl Marie are finding the board approaches an endgame too.
                  www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                  www.bishopcastle.us
                  www.bishopcastle.mobi

                  Comment

                  • David Merrill
                    Administrator
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 5950

                    #10
                    From the brain trust

                    I keep a bunch of great minds...

                    Pardon my grand ego trip.

                    The patent and trademark office never had any intention of betraying Big Pharma for my invention.


                    Above, you strike to the heart of A Course in Miracles. Upon changing a few words per page a new organization trademarked the title and now you buy their rendition at a high price, if you want to have reading group classes. I spent six years at 3hr/week studying the original rendition, one paragraph at a time.

                    Until Y2K the original rendition was secret work product of the CIA MKULTRA project. Even declassified very few people associate Bill's dosing Helen with LSD to Subproject 130 and its LSD source Subproject 77. This is essential in understanding ego formation, to take a trip off to the sidelines and witness the ego in formation. Page 53/now 58 says, I will never judge your ego, but I am trying to explain how the ego functions. Without knowing the origin of the work product however, ACIM invariably becomes a course in attacking the ego.

                    Guys know this is the advertisement for the stretchy gusset in the crotch - Duluth Trading Company.

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]6182[/ATTACH]

                    But we have all been there?

                    One might better comprehend that the Olympus Ordeal is about Paul being related to Caractacus the king of the Brits. Caractacus was renamed Eubulus by Caesar and subjected to Rome in trade to stay his execution. A vassal king certainly represents the taming of the ego.

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]6183[/ATTACH]
                    Attached Files
                    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                    www.bishopcastle.us
                    www.bishopcastle.mobi

                    Comment

                    • David Merrill
                      Administrator
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 5950

                      #11
                      attuning the morphogenetic field

                      I have been enjoying Star Trek - Discovery, a new serial. There is the myocelium a myocelial field much like I have imagined. Especially when I have said the pyramidal neuron architecture in our brain(s) (including the abdominal brain) maps exactly the stars in the nighttime sky. So grab an episode toward the end of Season 1 to get a feel for what I am talking about.

                      Now get a glimpse of how I utilize the myeloconia in the pineal gland.
                      Attached Files
                      www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                      www.bishopcastle.us
                      www.bishopcastle.mobi

                      Comment

                      • marcel
                        Senior Member
                        • Jun 2015
                        • 319

                        #12
                        Yeah, thinking about installing a spore hub drive in my car. Just beware of alternate universes when doing jumps.

                        Comment

                        • David Merrill
                          Administrator
                          • Mar 2011
                          • 5950

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Cheryl Marie
                          public-estatelinkThethe
                          Like in 2003 when China reacted to my Eradication of SARS invention by announcing (threatening) to patent the genome, this invention announcement is to prevent somebody from capitalizing on my "awesome" invention. Nothing more.

                          One might look at misguided David HUDSON. He kept thinking he should capture manna, or what he called ORMES, the white powder extracted from the meteorite impacted Arizona soil. The invention involved superconductivity and so the DoD became involved. It became more and more involved for David to get his patent, and finally the DoD was insisting he be able to convert the ORMES back to gold metal. That is when he realized that nobody could patent his invention, because he was already the inventor.

                          That was all he wanted all along. He did not want some big corporation company to grab the invention and hide it. So he quit throwing money into the ill-begotten notion that he was trying to get his name on ORMES.

                          Monatomic gold and such, especially healthy is Dr. DEAN with her Magnesium Miracle, is in the open domain. Anybody can put two electrodes in water with a DC voltage and benefit.

                          I enjoy your faith in the CQV. There was also the Treaty of 1213 where the Pope allegedly overturned the Magna Charta two years before its signing in 1215. Both were in the Lodge. So by 1666 there was allegedly the governing of the Venetians through Rome. Ergo, the Olympus Ordeal deals with Paul and his remand to Rome. I had a pass to the Passages museum display while the Green Initiative put together the Bible Museum in DC. Amazing stuff.

                          You can look for methods to regulate energy through machinations of law, using unbound administrative officials behaving as though they are judicial officers. Or you can manage energy. You probably saw the envelopes where I sent my patented invention to China. And I have other venues, including the brain trust too.

                          Thank you for assuming this is a problem. I have US Patent #10,999,999 and even the typo in the header - #11,999,999 on the same invention.

                          You have explained the intentions in the Letter well. I recall the specific instructions on the inventor name were exactly in alignment with Black's Law Dictionary 5th. And the diversions of energy also align with your suggestions about ALL UPPER CASE.

                          If that is the reasoning behind the rejection, then it was incumbent upon the USPTO to explain it that way. Instead they lied about three points that are simply proven out in the receipt. I am managing the energy, just like I did in 2003 and I explain that clearly. I am not applying for a patent. I have applied the patent for healing purposes.
                          Last edited by David Merrill; 10-29-20, 07:30 AM.
                          www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                          www.bishopcastle.us
                          www.bishopcastle.mobi

                          Comment

                          • David Merrill
                            Administrator
                            • Mar 2011
                            • 5950

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Cheryl Marie
                            commerce, one is an individual who is expected to know what he/she is doing? Commerce -- an international jurisdiction with rules of engagement -- is not tradediscover and understand your capacity in relation to your invention (i.e that you are not applying for a patent but are applying the patent for healing purposes) before issuing the rejection letter?


                            My point being, wherein which jurisdiction of law
                            What I keep hearing is that, "If you want to be understood in commerce, then act the role."

                            Or maybe rephrasing, "If you speak to the unredeemed, behave as though you are not redeemed yourself."

                            I say, Let the dead bury the dead.

                            Therefore the Notice stands sound in commerce. I signed it "Trustee of the Resulting Trust." I saw the instructions and understood how they wanted to divert the energy through the CQV Trust, as you describe it. This invention is much more effective the way I am executing application of my patent. The USPTO is mine now.
                            www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                            www.bishopcastle.us
                            www.bishopcastle.mobi

                            Comment

                            • David Merrill
                              Administrator
                              • Mar 2011
                              • 5950

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Cheryl Marie
                              My point being, wherein which jurisdiction of law
                              What I don't understand is my interest in explaining.

                              Maybe I should point out where, in the patented invention I say clearly that my invention replaces that loss.

                              A wacky looking Iranian strips some copper wire, burns it with a torch and advises people to use a dead AA battery to dissolve the copper with zinc into water. Then carefully drink the water with the pico - monatomic copper. This will cure and prevent COVID-19. Manna is manna. Once the metal loses its gluons it behaves all the same. The only way to distinguish what is in it is by arcing for minutes, reaching the boiling point of the metal(s) and the will be a flash while that particular manna compresses charge and disappears. But gold corresponds to the pineal gland and a fairly low boiling point among the transition (Noble) metals. So we find that composed the burning bush and sure enough Moses returned from the mountain enlightened.

                              P.S. I am adding some items from my desk. What you are looking at is magnesium manna fabrication. Yesterday the current was 1.1 uA (micro ampere) and today it is .88 uA. I carefully draw from the clear center of the glass with a straw then replenish the glass with Berkey Blue filtered water. Just the same, after a while without drinking the current went down, not up. So by keeping the voltage low I pump monatomic atoms of pure magnesium into the water from the negative (black) electrode (cathode). Rust, or magnesium oxide builds up and precipitates off the positive (anode) electrode. So the ionic content would rise if I were pumping metal clusters into the water, which would happen if I passed a certain voltage - maybe 2.5V instead of the 1V.

                              Human magnesome. I mention this as informative reading in US Patent #10,999,999.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	mag manna 11.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	317.8 KB
ID:	44898

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	mag manna 12.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	486.5 KB
ID:	44899

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	mag manna 13.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	569.4 KB
ID:	44900
                              Attached Files
                              Last edited by David Merrill; 10-29-20, 10:36 PM.
                              www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                              www.bishopcastle.us
                              www.bishopcastle.mobi

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X