endorsing and SS.......a big question!

[JohnnyCash]

What conflict? Sabo & Taxd2death, Your time is gonna come.

Interesting interview 3/28 with veteran Drake here: http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=205512

or here: http://freedomreigns.us/ALERTS.html

[JohnnyCash]

Just like to point out another clue that "jesse james" here is not who he claims. He has earlier stated to be an electrician from Iowa. I linked this image and asked him about it 3 times (twice here, once in another venue). He was silent; never answered. I submit that's probably because "jesse" is not an electrician at all. That's a Lil' Ripper Stripper electricians use to strip romex, cut the sheath, strip wires & bend them. Very handy little $5 tool. Even if not all electricians use one, they'd certainly have encountered one before & know what it is. But Jesse didn't. Why? Probably because he's no electrician at all, as he indicated.

Begs the question, why the attempt to mislead and who is he really? Well if David Merrill and the suitors have uncovered some important truths, sharing them publicly, truths if widely understood would threaten the cabal's trillion dollar fraud ...

I submit that this website is fairly crawling with minions of the darkside under various pseudonyms. I find that validating & encouraging.

[Gregory Harold]

It is going to be a daunting task for most of us to recover from the CTC way of doing things..Sorry about that. I am eternally grateful to Mr. Hendrickson for at least opening my eyes to there being something wrong. But, it didn't work.

Are you saying the entire CtC movement is 'dead'? What about those who are sole proprietors/self-employed who simply rebut 1099's and don't really have any problem with the IRS? It seems the CtC 'approach' gets 'thwarted' in the attempt to recover monies withheld by an "employer".

[JohnnyCash]

I am getting ready to apply remedy to my situation. Hopefully, going forward, it will have some immediate relief. But, past years will be tough. And if there is a tomorrow for me and my wife, then I hope it proves brighter than the yesterdays, as far as this stuff goes.
I know that from now on, I will study harder and learn better. I am thankful to all of you, especially Mr. Merrill. At least the folks here haven't come under too much fire and there seems to be a more educated "aura", if you will, in this forum. Looking forward to more learning, more doing, and taking back my identity. And by the way, I don't really believe that people like Jesse and Johnny mean any harm to each other or anyone here. I think they are both quite smart about this whole thing. I have learned from both. Hopefully, they meet some common ground soon. For the sake of Suitors.

As a peaceful inhabitant, I certainly mean no harm to anyone. Jesse is probably unhappy about not gaining any traction. His only following here is other quatlosers and his other sock-puppet usernames.

I doubt the purpose of joining this club is to beat us over the head with it.

[Taxd2death]

As a peaceful inhabitant, I certainly mean no harm to anyone. Jesse is probably unhappy about not gaining any traction. His only following here is other quatlosers and his other sock-puppet usernames.

I doubt the purpose of joining this club is to beat us over the head with it.

Fair enough. I think you both have awfully valid points.

[Taxd2death]

Are you saying the entire CtC movement is 'dead'? What about those who are sole proprietors/self-employed who simply rebut 1099's and don't really have any problem with the IRS? It seems the CtC 'approach' gets 'thwarted' in the attempt to recover monies withheld by an "employer".

No. I am not saying that it is dead. Who am I to say that? And I am not suggesting that we not rebut those forms. I just see that the one who taught us how to do it isn't winning the argument. I don't know how that is going to turn out. I know that I am not winning the argument and I am not nearly as knowledgeable as he is. I do agree with you that the "employer" issue is the crux of the problem. But, I receive both W2 and 1099 from same source. Rebutting one without the other doesn't fly. I get the resistance with both. No matter what.

[Chex]

The Galveston plan.

There is a whole lot of misinformation re: the SSTF. It lives! In a hearing yesterday the Chief Actuary, Mr Goss, explained that every check is issued from the trust fund.

What Happened to the $2.6 Trillion Social Security Trust Fund? You have to read the comments.

What happens is the FICA revenues come in and are placed into the SSTF account. SSA authorizes the monthly payments and Treasury writes check every Wednesday. Aug 3 is the 1st Wed.

What treasury does is redeem the SSTF special treasuries (convert them from intra-governmental to publcly owned). There is no change in the debt/debt ceiling as it was first calculated when received and placed into the trust fund.

During periods when there are monthly surpluses, that surplus is transferred to the Genera Fund. That?s is the way nearly every TF works, and for SS it was written into the original bill. Since 1935-7 it has operated this way with some minor differences.

Now, when there are SS deficits, Treasury just redeems the correct amount of SSTF bonds to cover the difference. That?s the way it was designed to work! http://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillm...-trust-fund/2/


The Galveston plan, which I wrote about a few months ago here, is also a very good option. http://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillm...d-prospered/2/

[outlierquest]

Newbie Here

Hello Everyone,

I'm new to this forum and am enjoying reading the posts. Concerning "lawful money" as a remedy, does anyone know how to fit this into "certain obligations of the United States" concerning purchases if you do not have much "lawful money"? The following code seems to be a remedy, but not sure. Any thoughts?

12 U.S.C. ? 347c : US Code - Section 347C: Advances to individuals, partnerships, and corporations; security; interest rate

Subject to such limitations, restrictions, and regulations as the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may prescribe, any
Federal reserve bank may make advances to any individual,
partnership, or corporation on the promissory notes of such
individual, partnership, or corporation secured by direct
obligations of the United States or by any obligation which is a
direct obligation of, or fully guaranteed as to principal and
interest by any agency of the United States. Such advances shall be
made for periods not exceeding 90 days and shall bear interest at
rates fixed from time to time by the Federal reserve bank, subject
to the review and determination of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.

Thanks,
Micha

[David Merrill]

Hello Everyone,

I'm new to this forum and am enjoying reading the posts. Concerning "lawful money" as a remedy, does anyone know how to fit this into "certain obligations of the United States" concerning purchases if you do not have much "lawful money"? The following code seems to be a remedy, but not sure. Any thoughts?

12 U.S.C. ? 347c : US Code - Section 347C: Advances to individuals, partnerships, and corporations; security; interest rate

Subject to such limitations, restrictions, and regulations as the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may prescribe, any
Federal reserve bank may make advances to any individual,
partnership, or corporation on the promissory notes of such
individual, partnership, or corporation secured by direct
obligations of the United States or by any obligation which is a
direct obligation of, or fully guaranteed as to principal and
interest by any agency of the United States. Such advances shall be
made for periods not exceeding 90 days and shall bear interest at
rates fixed from time to time by the Federal reserve bank, subject
to the review and determination of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.

Thanks,
Micha

I am not familiar with it. However it looks like a little-used provision due to FDIC.

[Goldi]

The irs has sent a memo for all exempt W4's to withhold at 30%. You may find yourself in the irs crosshairs when they review the data (W3) authorized by the W4 and see that you are indeed accumulating income but haven't had deductions withheld.
I bring this up because the W4 is giving the employer permission to treat your earnings as "wages" and as "wages" income tax liabilities incur at 26USC 3101 and 26USC 3402. Exempt or not this "exempt" status is not by any means telling the irs you cant be touched.

The smart individual would do up an affidavit - Pursuant to 5 USC 552 I do not give {your employer} permission to disclose any of my private financial information to any 3rd parties. Get it notarized, copied and send it to the payroll department of your company.

[Chex]

Take that paper to court and have the judge enforce it.

[David Merrill]

Bossing around payroll and personnel might easily backfire time for the next layoffs.