Deviant Oath? - Not a judge!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David Merrill
    Administrator
    • Mar 2011
    • 5949

    #76
    This is probably time for a complaint to a chief circuit judge. Or in Canada the top judge in the whole nation.
    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
    www.bishopcastle.us
    www.bishopcastle.mobi

    Comment

    • allodial
      Senior Member
      • May 2011
      • 2866

      #77
      Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
      This is probably time for a complaint to a chief circuit judge. Or in Canada the top judge in the whole nation.
      One can invoke a chief judge's duties as a conservator of the peace or peace officer as in notify them of the crime/grievance and actually require (use the the word require) them to see to it that the nuisance or problem is abated. Any judge that is lawfully seated is a conservator of the peace (de jure law enforcement).
      All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

      "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
      "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
      Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

      Comment

      • xparte
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2014
        • 742

        #78
        Something that just requires the appearance of justice has been the Judge & Clerks strategy on this patterned behavior known as our summary conviction court.re venue and arraignment has been possible again due too the lesson plan, yes in principal i have recorded and notarized formed for the record the significant Required due diligence as process requires[use the the word require] It seems all required notice has only a file form that is received and or refused on its suitability notify them of the crime/grievance and actually require them to see to it that the nuisance or problem is abated.The text book way is delivery too the County,s Provincial Chief Judge.As the judge in traffic court acting on behalf of her Majesty the QUEEN and CANADA being a federal crown corporation, being no provincial matter or a county crime no standing for indictments exists yet i had no luck to date getting my paperwork received on a county level. The redundancy being even if i managed to hand into the case a record that identifies my notice and the required refused for cause as federal crown has no jurisdiction/standing in provincial prosecutions and provincial crown has no jurisdiction/standing in federal prosecutions. avoiding overwhelming odds the crown is seeing my appearance as acquiesce that corrects a provincial crown agent has permission to act as a federally appointed agent.My point is notice to the provincial judge is just further exposure as he also is acting federally in a county court house having no juice to here a Criminal Code of CANADA matter so a waste of time its all provincial acting as a federal/state

        Comment

        • DouglasOfAvalon
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2016
          • 3

          #79
          i agree

          Originally posted by Gavilan View Post
          David,

          Reading Ronald Dean's process above, it reads that UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the one bringing the action in rem, but logically, if government is an entity that cannot reason but through its agents, wouldn't it also make sense to attach the agent, shouldn't the agent be also liable to damages for his actions?
          Yes, holding these "agents" (employees) 'personally liable' for their malicious ac ts will stop this nonsense. I am proving this in court using that REGISTERED legal business name. Here is a paper I authored explaining what I have recently discovered. BTW, I am the guy driving around with the "PRIVATE PROPERTY" plates..

          This is a paper I originally authored to explain a remarkable discovery that I made back in February of 2014 . I may not be the first one to realize this as the reason we have been voluntarily submitting to government without knowing it, but I am certainly taking this to the next level and proving that this is that holy grail everyone seems to be seeking. I am now in the process of proving this in a court action with my registered business entity named as the "Plaintiff" and I as the attorney. I use that term "attorney" but make everyone fully aware that I am not 'licensed' to practice law and never use the term "attorney at law" or "counselor at law" to describe what my capacity is as the legal representative for my registered business entity in court. What I am exposing is how we unknowingly provide the court with total discretion by not realizing who we are and WHAT we are. When someone claims to be that legal name appearing on a Certificate of Live Birth, they exchange the God given rights they are born with for government privileges which is a HUGE mistake. The good news is that we can easily fix this and reverse that process allowing us to get back our inheritance. I hope this helps everyone look within themselves because we are doing all of this to ourselves and therefore have no one else to blame. It's also something only WE can do to correct that mistake and it involves something that is so easy, anyone can do it! Please pay it forward and share this online and spread the information I am providing to you for free far and wide! A belief is the absence of knowledge so I have no beliefs; I either KNOW it, or I don't. When we KNOW something, it ceases to be just a belief, correct? When we are able to apply that knowledge, that is when it becomes wisdom. I know this has completely changed the way I perceive the world and eliminated all fear in my life. Enjoy!


          cheers!

          Douglas of Avalon

          Comment

          • BLBereans
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2014
            • 275

            #80
            Because a sole proprietorship is not a separate legal entity, it is not itself a taxable entityno tax filings are required whatsoever.
            "accountholder" is like a trustee; without ANY liability for the business and affairs of the NAME other than administration. It is the necessary living being who facilitates the "pass-through" business transactions for the entity. 'Trustee' (accountholder) is NOT liable for any tax, fees, charges, etc. relating to the business of the NAME: he/she is an overseer or administrator.

            Makes sense for those who understand that the NAME is not 'you'.

            Where/who is the 'tax target' for the IRS in this scenario?

            Comment

            • David Merrill
              Administrator
              • Mar 2011
              • 5949

              #81
              Originally posted by allodial View Post
              One can invoke a chief judge's duties as a conservator of the peace or peace officer as in notify them of the crime/grievance and actually require (use the the word require) them to see to it that the nuisance or problem is abated. Any judge that is lawfully seated is a conservator of the peace (de jure law enforcement).
              This is of course encouraging but I have highlighted my point in red.

              Originally posted by DouglasOfAvalon View Post
              Yes, holding these "agents" (employees) 'personally liable' for their malicious acts will stop this nonsense. I am proving this in court using that REGISTERED legal business name. Here is a paper I authored explaining what I have recently discovered. BTW, I am the guy driving around with the "PRIVATE PROPERTY" plates..

              This is a paper I originally authored to explain a remarkable discovery that I made back in February of 2014 . I may not be the first one to realize this as the reason we have been voluntarily submitting to government without knowing it, but I am certainly taking this to the next level and proving that this is that holy grail everyone seems to be seeking. I am now in the process of proving this in a court action with my registered business entity named as the "Plaintiff" and I as the attorney. I use that term "attorney" but make everyone fully aware that I am not 'licensed' to practice law and never use the term "attorney at law" or "counselor at law" to describe what my capacity is as the legal representative for my registered business entity in court. What I am exposing is how we unknowingly provide the court with total discretion by not realizing who we are and WHAT we are. When someone claims to be that legal name appearing on a Certificate of Live Birth, they exchange the God given rights they are born with for government privileges which is a HUGE mistake. The good news is that we can easily fix this and reverse that process allowing us to get back our inheritance. I hope this helps everyone look within themselves because we are doing all of this to ourselves and therefore have no one else to blame. It's also something only WE can do to correct that mistake and it involves something that is so easy, anyone can do it! Please pay it forward and share this online and spread the information I am providing to you for free far and wide! A belief is the absence of knowledge so I have no beliefs; I either KNOW it, or I don't. When we KNOW something, it ceases to be just a belief, correct? When we are able to apply that knowledge, that is when it becomes wisdom. I know this has completely changed the way I perceive the world and eliminated all fear in my life. Enjoy!


              cheers!

              Douglas of Avalon
              I hold these guys accountable, but had to discover the authority that they by law, are accountable to.




              I have the components attached explaining why this response is in Tim TYMKOVICH Refusing my offer for Cause. I offered that he might wish to sign a proper bond and proceed to clean up the judiciary, and order by Comptroller Warrant payment to me of $23M. He has R4C'd and I expect that is because to sign a proper bond now would be a confession of guilt, of fraud up until now in his career.
              Attached Files
              Last edited by David Merrill; 10-16-16, 03:57 PM.
              www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
              www.bishopcastle.us
              www.bishopcastle.mobi

              Comment

              • allodial
                Senior Member
                • May 2011
                • 2866

                #82
                Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
                One can invoke a chief judge's duties as a conservator of the peace or peace officer as in notify them of the crime/grievance and actually require (use the the word require) them to see to it that the nuisance or problem is abated. Any judge that is lawfully seated is a conservator of the peace (de jure law enforcement).
                This is of course encouraging but I have highlighted my point in red.
                I have observed their conservator of the peace status successfully invoked--more than once. This power of conservator of the peace vests in the people (notice I didn't type 'citizens') all times. Citizens are also conservators of the peace by prescription. However, if I have not made myself clear then you are the conservator of the peace. If the state actors fail to conserve the peace or uphold the constitution (terms of the trust), then you have a case of executors de son tort trespassing widely on the estate (ergo invasion--it doesn't look like invasion because they wear the same uniforms and used the same symbols, seals and buildings as before >>VERY SNEAKY<<). The people have every right to exercise prerogative to clean house. Lawfully seated judges, sheriffs, attorneys general are all customary conservators of the peace. The problem with police officers is that they are of a devolved form of enforcement internal to municipal corporations and are employees to the corporation rather than to the state except in their peace officer capacity SEPARATE from their employment--in short: according to their employment they are at the behest of an attorney.

                The Mainstream Media has served to obscure this simple fact: the U.S.A. have been suffering from widespread dereliction of duty. America is being beset by invaders (1830s, 1870, Jim Crow laws (evidence of invasion) 1908, McKinley assassination, 1913/1913 gold theft, 1920s race riots, WTC gold theft, 1960/1970 Nixon-Johnson lawful money suppression, etc.). Fortunately, a resulting trust arises out of the thievery and hijacking. Putin AFAIK has suggested: the Bolsheviks are now in America.

                ***

                According to Erika Carle's revelations, the secular humanist likes to put private persons into positions pretending to be government. Well go figure, fake judges pretending to hold office is exactly that.

                Related:
                Why Things Are The Way They Are (Erica Carle)
                Last edited by allodial; 10-16-16, 06:18 PM.
                All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

                "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
                "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
                Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

                Comment

                • David Merrill
                  Administrator
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 5949

                  #83
                  Updating;

                  I filed a modified complaint - shortening the text down to five pages but a total of 67 pages including attachments. If David TIGHE took a second look at this Complaint then I imagine he would begin to realize the depth of this mess.

                  I figured that there was stipulation so that the clerk might not publish the doc on PACER in the Tenth Circuit so I tried to sneak it a day early into the USDC where I have two evidence repositories for each trust and have had success until this doc, getting published. It did not work. But this morning I watched for delivery and a few minutes later my default against TIGHE was published, if maybe only a few hours. But I grabbed it and will use it robustly.

                  This is summarized a bit, but that is because the Refusals for Cause are private to the living Trust in the header. - Which is only to say, if you want to get into my family stuff, then register on PACER and get the full doc. I think it is set to download but am not sure if you need to be registered on www.bishopcastle.us for that to happen. Let me know.

                  Notice of Void Judgments/Complaint.
                  Direct Link to Post.

                  Here it is on my gdrive.
                  Last edited by David Merrill; 11-24-16, 12:54 PM.
                  www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
                  www.bishopcastle.us
                  www.bishopcastle.mobi

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X