New Rendition of Libel of Review

[Mark Christopher]

Postal+Power.docUPU-Info[Postal Laws] 4-12-09.docUPU_STAMP_VESSEL-ADMIRALTY[1].pdf

Here are some docs on stamps that I have accumulated over time. Take them as you will. I can not speak to any of the info contained. Fun reading at least and may lead to some references.

Salve sis,
Mark Christopher.

[David Merrill]

No such animal. The only mixmasters you're going to find are old Cessnas.


______________________
free software downloads|free software|free downloads

Welcome Zohaib;


You have three premiere comments this morning and I read this one first. With the links I presumed you are a SPAMbot for a moment. But I read your other comments and discovered that this is actually a well-thought comment. I however know little about planes so forgive my presumption.

I gather you mean that there is no such animal as this new rendition of the Libel of Review in law. That I am mixing law models.

Especially with an Indian premise from your experience this might be a very revealing discussion! I do not even know what you call the law duty there in India.

For the application of mixmaster; and No such animal... We suitors have broken out of the traditional box for describing diversity. Traditional being a foreigner or litigants between different state laws looking for a federal judge to determine which state law applies and remanding it back to state court. Attorneys would say that is the only scope of diversity jurisdiction from the 'saving to suitors' clause. Here (and in the brain trust) we explore trust structures and mostly, diversity is described by being in contract with the Fed or not.


Crosstalk:

David,
*
Would you not be acting as Trustee if you Filed a 1040?* *There are only three players in this thing.* The Beneficiary, The Executor and the Trustee (IRS).* **We are the other tqo.* The IRS is assuming they are the beneficiary (or acting for the real one) and the Executor of the trust.* They assume we are the trustee - we acted like it by filing.
*
I would say R4C, explain who is in what position, and maintain that.


There was a letter of explanation along the way that Nickname did not share with us. That seemed to have no effect.



This approach is based on the remedy from 1913 is for anybody. It does not depend on the trust structure. I am inclined to think that trying to establish the trust structure is futile, compared to R4C, an evidence repository and evidence of the demand for lawful money. So be it that the Trustee has no tax liability.

Once you get the contract, or lack of it in the case of redeeming lawful money, established then that becomes the diversity. If there is no clearly established contract then one can R4C the initial offer effectively.


Does that help?

[veritas]

Libel

David, this is aequitas_veritas from the dp. I guess the main issue im having here understanding this is i have no idea what to expect after redeeming for lawful money. You are talking about libels of review, and R4C, and roundstamping, but i have no idea what any of that means or how to do it. If i redeem for lawful money and dont change how i do my taxes, then nothing will happen right? Im sorry if im asking you to spoonfeed me here, but i can read everything on here and only understand bits and pieces. I guess what im trying to say is i have a very order specific mind, and if i dont start at the beginning, i cant get the process.

[David Merrill]

David, this is aequitas_veritas from the dp. I guess the main issue im having here understanding this is i have no idea what to expect after redeeming for lawful money. You are talking about libels of review, and R4C, and roundstamping, but i have no idea what any of that means or how to do it. If i redeem for lawful money and dont change how i do my taxes, then nothing will happen right? Im sorry if im asking you to spoonfeed me here, but i can read everything on here and only understand bits and pieces. I guess what im trying to say is i have a very order specific mind, and if i dont start at the beginning, i cant get the process.

I hope you are still interested. I think maybe if you read James 1:23-28 or so...

If you have to learn it all academically before you will begin then you will spend a lot of time preparing. But think this through, making a demand for lawful money is risk free. Filing for a full refund of withholdings, that is where you start to put your neck out there. So you can begin by making your demand as best as you know how to express it, risk free. Doing so will help you get started now.

[allodial]

Fig tree..that doesn't produce fruit seems to draw a parallel with a factory that produces no cars but soaks up electricity and takes up space nonetheless. A plantation that...gives forth nada ..closed down? Any similarities.

Car factory / Produces nothing / Takes up space, power, owner has to pay property taxes maybe too / Shut down .. Founder moves on starts somethin

Plantation / Produces nothing / Takes up space , has workers plowing fields but not producing any return to the master / owner of the estate ('produces nothing' could be a mathematical net result) / Shut down / Founder moves on starts new shop

I found myself pondering the "USA" in various regards. I consider how many femmes these days don't know how to cook or don't even want to bother. How few people I've come across with a good work ethic. Feminism, lesbianism and male homosexuality to the point that a straight masculine Man who persists in that straightness is much at a Lesbian-Bi-Gay-run coffee shop is much like a Chinese man at cross-burning in Middle-O-Nowhere, 'Bama.

[David Merrill]

Fig tree..that doesn't produce fruit seems to draw a parallel with a factory that produces no cars but soaks up electricity and takes up space nonetheless. A plantation that...gives forth nada ..closed down? Any similarities.



I found myself pondering the "USA" in various regards. I consider how many femmes these days don't know how to cook or don't even want to bother. How few people I've come across with a good work ethic. Feminism, lesbianism and male homosexuality to the point that a straight masculine Man who persists in that straightness is much at a Lesbian-Bi-Gay-run coffee shop is much like a Chinese man at cross-burning in Middle-O-Nowhere, 'Bama.

I recall in junior high how I detested English - especially parsing out sentence structure into particulars like subordinate clause etc. That stuff was gagging me somehow and yet I think of how wealthy I would be now if only I had been interested.

Your post reminds me of how I would pass by the Home Economics room on my way to Metal and Wood Shop. I even recall one fellow being ribbed as femme or even homosexual, I don't recall exactly, for choosing Home Economics over the shop classes. Man! I am so glad to have even survived!

[allodial]

Interestingly I've come across a writer with very interesting theory that the ultimate real man would be interested in taking Home Ec. rather than shop because he would be interested in mastering the ruminants of commanding a household. Plus, that's where all the chics would be hanging out. The feminism (lesbianism doctrinology) claims men to be brutish and so they created peer pressure and doctrinology gave a push toward a Shop Class full of men rather than a room full of women. The irony! Similarly feminism creates peer pressure to make women make self-defeating choices to frustrate hypergamy.

Home Ec. class full of women would be quite an interesting camp for a rogue feminist so they'd want all the men in shop to help support theories. A man in the class would ruin the false caricature.

Perhaps the lesbian-feminists-homosexuals at the coffee shop are angry for at the straight man for not taking shop class and knowing how to do things that they don't know how to do and perhaps also for possessing power that they either don't have, rejected or forfeited?

***

Production of fruit is a very Real Man thing. He's farming, planting seeds, husbandry, feeding the herd, etc. Lesbianism and homosexuality seem rather contrary to fruit-bearing. A topic rife for parables, allegories and parallels.

The deception in the Garden of Eden story may have been geared toward toppling overall productivity by making Eve believe that she could be Adam's equal or superior but the result is that it may have become harder for her and him to bear fruit after the fact! Sounds all too familiar!

Related to the thread: theft of a real man's fruit seems to be a tactic used by anti-Creator lesbian-feminist orators to try to cripple real men and bring them and their substance into their embrace (they cant make or produce what he can has so voila -> theft as a modus operandi ..if only they could get real man to volunteer to the theft then its not REALLY theft is it? you get what im sayin'--not to mention anything about rogue social workers!). As we know, there is a higher power!

Someone suggested that the real allegory behind the movie Crying Game was how feminism was making women grow penises (functionally transgender) and so paralleling how a husband might realizes his wife is really a man (competing with him and caught up in feminism-lesbianism she hinders fruit bearing and productivity and promotes wastage of his energie--i.e. her theft and dishonor--supported by State actors potentially) and so he vomits in disgust up upon seeing her 'functional penis' and realizing he was married to a man all along!

P.S. Ain't it something. I can cook, clean and sew and yet I meet women who cant and dont even want to know how to. (She relies on companies run by men for food!). They want to live in my house, take up space, soak up my electricity, argue, fight, compete with me, offer me money/cars rather than children/loyalty/devotion/herself (counterproductive!). I laugh.

Shop Class -> Production and management of inanimate/dead things [consider Cain's offering]
Home Ec. -> Production and management of living things [consider Abel's offering]

Feminism -> Tricks women into making the wrong offering to men or men into being hoodwinked into unfair contracts. [What were you doing in the bar if you didn't know? <-> Why did you sign the form if you didn't know? <-> Why are you in the US District Court building if you aren't a US citizen? <-> Why were you in the court room if you didn't know? <-> Why are you endorsing private credit if you didn't know? ]

It doesnt take too much to effort to draw parallels to Bretton Woods and Basel III.

[David Merrill]

You have said many of the things I implied. Meanwhile I remember some of the boys in the hallway looking at the guy in Home Ec and laughing so I asked him why he chose Home Ec? - hoping to bully him a little. He smiled and pointed out that he was in a class full of girls. That took the testosterone out of my homophobic sails right there!

Interesting about chattel - we have this distinction between the living and the dead. I was thinking about how shop class is all about fabricating/making stuff and thought I had a counterpoint to debate until I got to your last paragraphs Allodial. Then I saw it! How much more difficult it would be to get this government debt is money illusion over on folks if guys knew how to run a household, mix ingredients and follow a recipe, mend and build clothing but primarily track finances and budget - and save up instead of applying for credit.

One day though, I shall master a sewing machine!


Regards,

David Merrill.

[Michael Joseph]

you know a friend and I [he is 63] were just discussing feminism the other day. He and I came to the conclusion that it was a rouse by the managing class to get more labor at a cheaper rate. The market had overnight twice as much labor - therefore by supply and demand - the management could reduce the pay scale - therefore, it took two to work in order to maintain the same lifestyle that one [father] could provide before. And who suffers - EVERYONE - because little Johnny and little Susie are now shuffled off to the Public Fool System where they are taught to be good little Clerks - may I take your order please.

This week boys and girls we will study X and at the end of the week we will test on X. I mean after 12 years of the PFS if you can't take an order then you truly are a numbskull.

I know, I have just infuriated all the women - so be it.

MJ

[David Merrill]

I actually fail to see why you would infuriate women. I was getting worked up but I just don't see why women would be taking offense at what you said.

[Treefarmer]

you know a friend and I [he is 63] were just discussing feminism the other day. He and I came to the conclusion that it was a rouse by the managing class to get more labor at a cheaper rate. The market had overnight twice as much labor - therefore by supply and demand - the management could reduce the pay scale - therefore, it took two to work in order to maintain the same lifestyle that one [father] could provide before. And who suffers - EVERYONE - because little Johnny and little Susie are now shuffled off to the Public Fool System where they are taught to be good little Clerks - may I take your order please.

This week boys and girls we will study X and at the end of the week we will test on X. I mean after 12 years of the PFS if you can't take an order then you truly are a numbskull.

I know, I have just infuriated all the women - so be it.

MJ

I do not take offense at this, I think you are exactly right.
You followed the money and deduced one of the true motives behind feminism.
Another motive for feminism is the Satanic destruction of the God-ordained marriage of one man with one woman, which leads to the destruction of families, which results in the destruction of children, IMO.

I think you are right on with your comment, except for your spelling of "rouse"; you were probably thinking of ruse?

[Anthony Joseph]

This "idea" (feminism) was NO DOUBT created by men; men who would eventually profit (in many ways) from its indoctrination into modern culture and society.

Think about it for a minute, in the 1950's the family unit was as strong as ever in the modern age for obvious reasons. People understood the Divine heirarchy and gender roles which made for strong family ties and no need for the STATE to play "nanny" or "parent". That success, if left alone, would only get stronger and stronger and something had to be done to break-up the traditional family unit if the STATE wanted to grow and expand its control.

Enter feminism, socialism/communism, homosexuality, humanism, sexual revolution, etc.

These ideas convinced women that possibly the most honorable and noble endeavor on earth (mothering/nurturing children and keeping a happy home) was somehow a waste of their life's potential. It also convinced them that sexual promiscuity is a woman's way to break free from the chains of "archaic" notions of virtue and being pure.

How's that working out ladies? Ask the women of the sixties and seventies who "bought in" if they feel good about "breaking those chains" and if they at all benefited from that activity now. The beneficiaries of that doctrine are the men who suddenly became surrounded by an onslaught of "easy women" in the sixties, seventies and beyond. Does feminism still sound like a noble idea from the minds of women?

Modern technology/computers, feminism and overseas job outsourcing combined for the destruction of the family unit since "Dad" no longer could support his family as he once could. Machines/computers, women and foreigners are doing the jobs he used to do and he no longer has the respect of being the provider for his family.

Enter depression, alcoholism, abuse, mediocrity, laziness, drug addiction, etc.

Modern society intentionally blurs the gender line so that women act like men and men act like women creating a non-gender distinguishing amalgam of humans; THE NEW NORMAL.

How's that working out? The STATE is bigger than ever and has more control it has ever had. We have the most people ever relying on and trusting in the STATE, in one way or another, than ever before.

But then again, this is all just common sense, isn't it?

[David Merrill]

I suppose that there is often a brief flash of victory at the moment of emasculation, as he turns his back:

The world was calling you away, and your leaving was your way of staying with what you had come to say.
The pain was a poem, slowly written and torn from the book, cast into a corner of the attic where no one could look.
Rage for all to see caught fire and burned all around me until there was nothing left to burn.
Now I stand all alone in these attic bones and reread this poem all yellowed with age.
Tears heal such as healing is and so I cast this page into the ashes;
And there is no flame - only shades of regret.
And those too shall fade, as the world calls me away.


That may not be published except for an introduction to another song on Live at the Bass by Lindsey BUCKINGHAM. I put it to memory because I wanted to be as good as Lindsey at something on stage. So as long as he is not playing that guitar of his...

[Michael Joseph]

What is amazing to me is that we live in the space age and our technology which we possess is amazing to say the least - witness the words on this page - and YET man is still plagued with spiritual curses. It seems that with the advance of technology also too an advance of spiritual plagues. So the flesh has been sated in pleasures in hedonism and yet the spirit remain without rest. And man seems to think by and large we are headed for some sort of utopia under man? HARDLY.

And all along the Company Store keeps issuing Credit to those who will feed their Ego in Things - which is a sickness in low esteem - meaning he and she work to feel a sense of value and a sense of purpose and a sense of fitting in with all the rest of the CRAZY men and women out there who are stuck in the same rut. The debtor is slave to the lender. Lets appeal to their sub-conscious with commercial ads that promote more buying - for buying is love - if you love her you will buy for her. Oh crap how are we gonna ever get out of debt - The Trap - because she watches the same TV and sees the same ads.

I MUST buy, MUST buy....

AJ - you strike at the root - which is the Natural Purpose - which is God Ordained. But man chooses perversion and unnatural acts which will always lead to mans ruin. She is a peculiar treasure to the husbandman. But then again if she is spoiled in the world of Estates - she no longer desires to be a femme covert she desires to be a femme sole and as such she and he bring spiritual plagues upon the children.

Now then I as the husbandman stand in the stead of my wife for she is my peculiar treasure as long as she submits and obeys me and I shall love her and overshadow her and protect her from those who would bring harm to our door - first they must come thru me. Therefore she cannot contract unless I allow it and I am not fond of allowing my wife to enter into the plagues of commercial warfare.

Therefore my LoR is enough for both of us for she and I are One. My child told me the other day "daddy I should obey you for God gave me to you and to disobey you is to disrespect God's authority" - I paraphrase but the point is made. There is a natural order of things. And in the natural order blessings abound.

Shalom,
MJ

[shikamaru]

Economics .... the art of running a household ...

Greek ... home rule or home law.