A brief history of Birth Certificates

[shikamaru]

Thank you for posting Shikamaru. I know lacing a post with links takes a deliberate effort.

Walter, please style your posts so that paragraph structure keeps your points clear and together. Mostly though I find it difficult to tell when you are quoting or not. Sorry to mention it but I find your posts difficult to read.

We are trying to correct that character replacement problem.

I feel like my responses are cross-linked with another thread for some reason.
If so, I apologize.

With birth certificates, I need to root and hog for the nature; history; and development of certificates.

[David Merrill]

ALL estates flow from a Throne - be it a king or a queen. And a Throne begs a Kingdom. And a Kingdom begs a Survey. Therefore all estates issued within a particular survey are subject to the Throne holding Allodial Title and therefore said Estates are ALL QUALIFIED.

There are no United e[States] absent a Throne and a Grant that proceedeth forth from said Throne. I believe a study of Sir Walter RALEIGH may be quite enjoyable. What was his Purpose?

Shalom,
MJ

Thank you for your Order!

[That is MacDonald's for - I like your style!] It is good of you to remember that I have been re-reading LOSSING's Our Country lately (copyright 1888).

[Treefarmer]

I like The Complete Jewish Bible's translation of that verse: The religious observance that God the Father considers pure and faultless is this: to care for orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being contaminated by the world. There's a subtle yet important difference, I think, between religion and religious observances.

That's very interesting, thank you for pointing this out Seosaidh.
I was not aware of there being a distinction.

[Michael Joseph]

I like The Complete Jewish Bible's translation of that verse: The religious observance that God the Father considers pure and faultless is this: to care for orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being contaminated by the world. There's a subtle yet important difference, I think, between religion and religious observances.

Yes indeed....from THE COMPANION BIBLE

Jas 1:27 Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their trouble, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.


visit. Personal interest and sympathy are enjoined.


Thanks DM - I will want to read that .pdf.

[Chex]

That's very interesting, thank you for pointing this out Seosaidh. I was not aware of there being a distinction.

Either did I.

ELIZABETH by the Grace of God of England, Fraunce and Ireland Queene, defender of the faith, &c. To all people to whome these presents shall come, greeting.

Knowe yee that of our especial grace, certaine science, and meere motion, we haue given and graunted, and by these presents for us, our heires and successors, we giue and graunt to our trustie and welbeloued seruant Walter Ralegh, Esquire, and to his heires assignee for euer, free libertie and licence from time to time, and at all times for ever hereafter, to discover, search, finde out, and view such remote, heathen and barbarous lands, countries, and territories, not actually possessed of any Christian Prince, nor inhabited by Christian People, as to him, his heires and assignee, and to every or any of them shall seeme good, and the same to haue, horde, occupie and enjoy to him, his heires and assignee for euer, with all prerogatives, commodities, jurisdictions, royalties, privileges, franchises, and preheminences, thereto or thereabouts both by sea and land, whatsoever we by our letters patents may graunt, and as we or any of our noble progenitors haue heretofore graunted to any person or persons, bodies politique.or corporate: and the said Walter Ralegh, his heires and assignee, and all such as from time to time, by licence of us, our heires and successors, shall goe or trauaile thither to inhabite or remaine, there to build and fortifie, at the discretion of the said Walter Ralegh, his heires and assignee, the statutes or acte of Parliament made against fugitives, or against such as shall depart, romaine or continue out of our Realme of England without licence, or any other statute, acte, lawe, or any ordinance whatsoever to the contrary in anywise notwithstanding.

Avalon Project - Charter to Sir Walter Raleigh : 1584

[David Merrill]

You are welcome MJ;


That may be particularly interesting to aware people in the Carolinas!

[walter]

Thank you for posting Shikamaru. I know lacing a post with links takes a deliberate effort.

Walter, please style your posts so that paragraph structure keeps your points clear and together. Mostly though I find it difficult to tell when you are quoting or not. Sorry to mention it but I find your posts difficult to read.

We are trying to correct that character replacement problem.

i am not familiar with how to use this format on this forum yet,
i tried posting documents but can't,
i don't know how you guys get the blue words to reference a point of interest linked to other documents or web site,

Shikamaru, most of the stuff you posted referring to my post is exactly to the point i am trying to make,
i can't respond to your points with out making it difficult to read for the reason mentioned above,
sorry for my ignorance on how to use computers,



but your link to wiki info:

Equitable versus legal title

The equitable title is the right to obtain full ownership of property, where another maintains legal title to the property. legal title is actual ownership of the property. When a contract for the sale of land is executed, equitable title passes to the buyer. When the conditions on the sale contract have been met, legal title passes to the buyer in what is known as closing. Legal and equitable title also arises in trust. In a trust, one person may own the legal title, such as the trustees. Another may own the equitable title such as the beneficiary.[2]

says it all, usufruct,

equitable title = beneficiary ( having the benefit of holding that title, that's what i mean by benefit title holder)
legal title = trustee

all charges or easements are on the legal side of the title, they have to be because the charges and easements are created in the legal world,
the government is holding the legal side of the title,
should not the legal title holder be liable for these legal charges?

the beneficiary becomes liable when they use the government created name on the bc,
bc = federal employee

federal employee = trustee

until that is corrected the problem remains,

[Chex]

I believe it is a matter of which estate you choose - mammon or God.

Many feel compelled to choose the mammon system and I understand and do not judge. Mainly because the remedy - redeeming lawful money is for persons who wish to terminate the status of state bank with the Federal Reserve. So it applies to persons. I have decided on my new World ID Card and Passport to have a Date of Birth again. The Name field which is actually used for Surname will remain blank. If a customs officer runs David Merrill and the DoB they will likely find a full legal name and inquire if it is my name? At that time I will be able to choose whether or not IT serves me to have or to "own" it. I will be making easement on to that survey - what I am calling mammon in this post.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1621http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/coll...ionCode=USCODEhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...al_Corporation

Court Rules http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/frcourt.html

Back to the passports.

22 CFR 51.42 - Persons born in the United States applying for a passport for the first time. | Title 22 - Foreign Relations | Code of Federal Regulations | LII / Legal Information Institute http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/22/51.42certificates of circumcision, other documentary evidence created shortly after birth but generally not more than 5 years after birth, and/or affidavits of persons having personal knowledge of the facts of the birth.

So how many women you know have had a FGM? http://www.bing.com/search?q=female+...00a4040fd517ed

Funny how some lawmakers are using the law like in Arizona GOP to Obama: Show Us Your Circumcision Certificate. http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2011...a-circumcision

[Frederick Burrell]

The right of self determination. Personal secession will solve most of your problems. Absent agreement, absent full disclosure and your notice, coupled with a peace agreement, treaty, changes ones status from citizen and combatant to that of full sovereign.

[Frederick Burrell]

double post

[Freed Gerdes]

What is this peace agreement and treaty you speak of, FB? I can't even get the Federal Reserve to admit that lawful money exists... After you make your demand for lawful money, which demand constitutes an appearance, thus collapsing the trust and reverting the res to you, you are no longer in contract with the Fed/Treasury/Federal government. What further steps do you see being needed to stop being a 14th Amendment citizen, and federal employee?