Generic Notice and Demand - $350 civil suit

[Michael Joseph]

So I should just get up and walk away from the things I signed for? I had trust in you, and you raped me.

If you are asking me, then well, there you go again. Why ask if you don't trust in me? You really don't want me to answer this - I can tell. I am saddened that "you" raped "you".

This choice of words utilized in such as statement is a poor net cast upon, well, who knows "you"? Who is "you"? One thing is for sure it ain't me. But since one testifies, to quote: "I had trust in you" meaning that one made someone their sovereign - and what?, the sovereign made one do a thing one did not want to do? Well now, who again made one place one's trust there? I think the someone might be found in the mirror.

A door does not open by itself. I am still looking for one's name on a Dollar? I can't seem to find mine. How about yours? Do you see your name on the Dollar? But who is you? So I will just say I don't see "you" or the man or woman acting in or for the persona Chex, or for that matter, the persona named Chex upon the Dollar? Why is that? It is your money right? There I go again....who is "your"?

Cast this net upon some other waters - there are no fish here to collect.

Shalom,
MJ

[Freed Gerdes]

Let's try to identify some of Chex's pronouns. Perhaps he is referring to the US Treasury, which tricked him into debt servitude with words of art and legal presumptions. Suppose you make a demand for lawful money to the Federal Reserve; it is their money, so they have to redeem it. Now register your legal name in your state as a dba (a Ficticious Name, ie, a legal 'person'). Now you (the natural person declarant) have rebutted the presumption that you want to traffic in FRN's, and pay 'income' taxes on those. He (declarant) has also redeemed his estate out of the US Government's bankruptcy, thus removing the liens held by the Treasury due to the use of debt money, so now he has legal title to his estate, held under the legal name dba, registered and recognized by a state of the union. Thus he is no longer under the Treasury usufructuary trust, as he is no longer 'in the US,' but is now dba in a state. Since a trust only has validity when it has assets in it, by redeeming his estate he has collapsed the Treasury's trust, ie "I have no trust in the US Treasury." He now resides in the material world, in a trust granted to Man by God, where he again has unalienable rights, including the right to own property (this is still a usufructuary trust, but God gives better terms than the US govt). Thus he has chosen (which is a First Amendment right) to put his trust in the republic founded under the Constitution, which has accepted that the material world is in a trust granted by God ('In God We Trust' approved by US Congress in 1861), and forswears the trust granted by the US corporate govt on the presumption that he is dead (which has also been rebutted). Now there can be no constructive trust presumed by the courts since there is no original trust in the corporate government; there are only contracts, and those only entered knowingly and voluntarily. This would not be walking away from what you signed. It would be intentionally rebutting the presumptions by which the corporate government is trying to control you, since you volunteered. Call it unvolunteering.

Freed G

[xparte]

Going over the old posts is as important as finding a new friend .A busy travelled road one day is a peaceful drive another. highway 61 revised MJ Merrill Chx

[allodial]

Let's try to identify some of Chex's pronouns. Perhaps he is referring to the US Treasury, which tricked him into debt servitude with words of art and legal presumptions. ...

Was it the Treasury or Congress which created the FRB?

[Chex]

Suppose you make a demand for lawful money to the Federal Reserve; it is their money, so they have to redeem it. Freed G

LOL! Been there done that. I asked them and they said they have nothing to do with redemption of FRN's.

So who is the only beast left?

Was it the Treasury or Congress which created the FRB?

Richmond said " Federal Reserve Banks were established by the Congress as the operating arms of the nation's central banking system. Many of the services provided to depository institutions and the federal government by this network of Reserve Banks are similar to services provided by commercial banks and thrift institutions to business customers and individuals. However, the Federal Reserve Banks do not provide banking services, including accounts, to individuals". https://www.richmondfed.org/faqs/frs

[Freeman]

Redeem before sending out certified NaD?

Are you able to start redeeming lawful by endorsing the back of the check before you send out the NaD that will be served to the bank? Is there somewhere I can read to what exactly can be redeemed as lawful money?

[David Merrill]

If you begin thinking of redemption as non-endorsement I believe you will start to understand your own subsequent questions.

[Freeman]

thanks david, i referred back to one of the articles you authored https://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com...2-section-411/ and to another section on forum where you seem to elaborate more, I think I'm starting to make this a little more complicated than it has to be. The problem for me personally is the learning process, I am more of a hands on learner, and with the redeeming process I've been gathering too much information without putting it into context of actually working with it, so it feels as if I'm jumping around. But with some of the videos and audio files I've found on here it seems to be helping.

[marcel]

Are [Federal] Reserve Bank employees government employees?
No.

https://www.richmondfed.org/faqs/fr