SDR's are Piracy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David Merrill
    Administrator
    • Mar 2011
    • 5949

    #1

    SDR's are Piracy?

    Here is an interesting case. I have attached the recent docket report.

    From what I can tell the plaintiff is claiming that the county is plundering for the IMF through illegal and non-consensual Special Drawing Rights. The judge dismissed the case as nonsensical giving the plaintiff a chance to make some sense but he refused the Order and returned the mail as unfit for delivery. Strangely all the defendants started appearing? So the judge reiterated that the case is garbage but it would seem the plaintiff is the court of record using the USDC much as many suitors do.
    Attached Files
    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
    www.bishopcastle.us
    www.bishopcastle.mobi
  • David Merrill
    Administrator
    • Mar 2011
    • 5949

    #2
    Here are a couple dropbox links publicizing some of the nitty gritty:



    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
    www.bishopcastle.us
    www.bishopcastle.mobi

    Comment

    • EZrhythm
      Senior Member
      • May 2011
      • 257

      #3
      QUITE EXCELLENT! Thank You for sharing this David.

      Comment

      • Gavilan
        Senior Member
        • May 2012
        • 346

        #4
        What is this guy Martin trying to do?

        I can't make sense of his pleadings or filings.

        Comment

        • Michael Joseph
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 1596

          #5
          Originally posted by EZrhythm View Post
          QUITE EXCELLENT! Thank You for sharing this David.
          You know it dawns on me, while the spin doctors would have us to believe in the "boogey man" hiding behind socialism or communism or fascism or even capitalism these are just labels on the real moving force with is MONEY- ISM. None of these ISM's can effectively operate without money. And therefore what is really being asserted is the extent that a government will interfere with markets. But if the government has been compromised by the Corporation thru loans - [MONEY-ISM] then the trustees no longer serve the people but they serve the private shareholders who are most times foreign to the nation-state being considered.

          Therefore the SDR is just a Globalization currency which is in effect the same operation as the local currency FLAVOR within a local nation-state. The SDR is what I believe will nationalize the world into UNIONS - remember that capatilized terms in the preamble - 'a more perfect Union'.

          Please dear reader show me with specificity the document that established the meaning of this capitalized noun. Finding it capitalized, it cannot have a meaning common to everyday usage. But I digress.

          How can anyone place trust in this system? Hemath will plague Israel until the going down of the sun.

          1Ch_2:55 And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab.

          Amo_6:14 But, behold, I will raise up against you a nation, O house of Israel, saith the LORD the God of hosts; and they shall afflict you from the entering in of Hemath unto the river of the wilderness.

          It's all the same, only the names have changed.....Tyre has become New York.
          The blessing is in the hand of the doer. Faith absent deeds is dead.

          Lawful Money Trust Website

          Divine Mind Community Call - Sundays 8pm EST

          ONE man or woman can make a difference!

          Comment

          • David Merrill
            Administrator
            • Mar 2011
            • 5949

            #6
            I have correctly found decryption of derivatives*System with his signature bond and then renege?


            * Dissolving a derivative requires integration. However the offset is lost and often will be expressed as "...+ C". An unknown constant lingers. This ambiguity seems to be expressed by the Mammon (Union) to be lacking specificity and the judge therefore pleads ignoramus. Please explain that again so I can understand?


            In other words if Martin had only been redeeming lawful money from the start, then there would have been no residual or first lien on what he thought was his property.
            Last edited by David Merrill; 08-21-13, 01:31 PM.
            www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
            www.bishopcastle.us
            www.bishopcastle.mobi

            Comment

            • David Merrill
              Administrator
              • Mar 2011
              • 5949

              #7
              P.S. I should add that the cause smacks of negative averment. That is to say that all I hear speaking is Martin. The LoR process enters the Presenter's testimony Refused for Cause into the record.

              One might look into the history of SDR's:




              As the US banks (Suitors and StSCer's) are redeeming lawful money Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa bonded together to for BRICS - with informally Indonesia joining afterward - BRICI?
              Attached Files
              Last edited by David Merrill; 08-21-13, 03:29 PM.
              www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
              www.bishopcastle.us
              www.bishopcastle.mobi

              Comment

              Working...
              X