Person contains a corporation, collection of infants, etc.

[northstar430]

[David Merrill]

I used that construction with marginal success for the longest time.

Where does IT reside? In other words a PERSON is a trust construction = an agreement. The all upper case name on the PERSON, the name of IT is the name of a social compact. If IT serves you for it to exist; primarily the example as a driver license then have a full understanding of how the three components of my Lesson Plan work in conjunction:

1) True identity
2) Record forming
3) Redeeming lawful money

I do not insist on my mental model about PERSON but you might care to try it on for size and see how it functions. When you understand yourself as the Man, regenerate and living, unless you are going to hunt and grow - these violent actions requiring you make a claim to land and assets thereon you are contracting that violence out to the butcher and farmer. You need to war to be in the world, in other words. Become crafty in commerce - that is to say become educated and good at business and you can manage all this violence in a civilized fashion, through contracting.

Therefore it is wise to merge my Lesson Plan with good foundation of trust law.

[shikamaru]

Include can mean whatever the legislature or author decides they want it to mean within the context of that which is written.

[northstar430]

Include is expansive!!

Include can mean whatever the legislature or author decides they want it to mean within the context of that which is written.

Include is expansive. The author uses include to define the component so there is no dispute. Here is an example.

"My car includes muffler."

The author want you to know the car has muffler as a component. There are cars that don't have mufflers. There could be a dispute whether or not the car has muffler. To clarify it, the author uses include.

"The person means a human being, or corporation." Mean is substitution. When you see person, it can apply to a human being or a corporation.

The rules of construction that state that a "person include a corporation." The human being has a corporation inside or owns the corporation totally. 1 USC 8 state that the word "human being" and "individual" is every infant of the homo sapiens species. Where the infants in your person?

[David Merrill]

Please try to use correct grammar and spelling. I cannot follow your parsing out definitions because you have typos and sentences that do not make sense to me.

[pumpkin]

Terms defined by the legislatures are creations of the legislature. This is apparent when they redefine a word for a few specific sections of statute or code. I am a man, one of the people. Since the people created government, the people and any aspect of the people, cannot be defined or diminished by the legislature. It is simply against the laws of nature that a creation can define its creator. So, IMO, the definitions within code do not concern me or my rights.