Claim the Name .before they do.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BlackAdmin
    replied
    Originally posted by walter View Post
    I was looking for this case for a long time and stumbled across it today by accident looking for something else.
    Sure glade I found it. Its a hammer.
    Regina vs Frank bruno
    [ATTACH]3705[/ATTACH]
    I was searching for a clearer copy of that transcript - thank you for posting this Walter!

    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by walter View Post
    How does that court case connect to claiming the NAME?

    From the
    "Criminal Code of Canada":

    every one, person and owner, and similar expressions, include Her Majesty and an organization;



    from the
    Privacy Act (Federal/Canada)
    Where personal information may be disclosed

    (2) Subject to any other Act of Parliament, personal information under the control of a government institution may be disclosed
    (d) to the Attorney General of Canada for use in legal proceedings involving the Crown in right of Canada or the Government of Canada;



    Connect the dots, only the AG and his deputy assistant can bring chargers in a criminal case.
    The Crown prosecutor needs POA for standing. They almost never have it. Maybe in very high profile cases they might. Its because of who can use the NAME and not necessary the criminal code.
    The criminal code minus the NAME is just a paper with words on it with no legal effect.

    Exactly. Notice Daniel Howard MAY never actually signed this Power of Attorney:


    Oath and Insurance Bond - Vacant District Attorney.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Thank you Walter;

    You showed that just as a Canadian suitor was feeling anxious about his Redemption Demand.



    P.S. Interestingly the "Honorable Judge De COUTO" did not take a moment to actually sign it?
    Last edited by David Merrill; 03-15-16, 09:21 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • walter
    replied
    How does that court case connect to claiming the NAME?

    From the
    "Criminal Code of Canada":

    every one, person and owner, and similar expressions, include Her Majesty and an organization;



    from the
    Privacy Act (Federal/Canada)
    Where personal information may be disclosed

    (2) Subject to any other Act of Parliament, personal information under the control of a government institution may be disclosed
    (d) to the Attorney General of Canada for use in legal proceedings involving the Crown in right of Canada or the Government of Canada;



    Connect the dots, only the AG and his deputy assistant can bring chargers in a criminal case.
    The Crown prosecutor needs POA for standing. They almost never have it. Maybe in very high profile cases they might. Its because of who can use the NAME and not necessary the criminal code.
    The criminal code minus the NAME is just a paper with words on it with no legal effect.

    Leave a comment:


  • walter
    replied
    I was looking for this case for a long time and stumbled across it today by accident looking for something else.
    Sure glade I found it. Its a hammer.
    Regina vs Frank bruno
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Go Advanced. Manage Attachments button below. Sometimes the .pdf file is too large.

    Leave a comment:


  • walter
    replied
    How do I attach a pdf file to this thread?

    Leave a comment:


  • george
    replied
    if got a new neighbor across the street that been shooting his gun often. last night around 11pm and now. its been happening often.

    so I cant think well right now. the red text kinda disturbing too.

    Ive been shot at by black youth gangs. home full of holes from drive bys. I go through more than most.

    I will to be back here later.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post

    God as Witness, detached. I AM/WE ARE the Witness. Fetch the Father, Son and Spirit by birthright.
    Kurt does not rely on metaphysics and such, he is writing about the physical creator(s), the living God. youd probably have to listen to him explain the waiver to comprehend it but basically all those capable of creating are God(s) including those who were present from the beginning (upon the physical man exiting the birth canal) this would be the doctor, docs helpers, mom, dad, anyone present when we were born.

    Maybe some demonstrations by the author are necessary. How does this Waiver serve him?


    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Sworn - as found in the attachment.
    attestation is swearing?

    I simply assert that a physical landmark, monuments and fossils of thought are more substantial in establishing a claim.

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Treaties being burned?
    all records, everything in the court houses and other large family houses so many of southern heritage have no way to trace their heritage. I suspect this is the main reason this tactic was preformed.

    There was something called "carpetbaggers". I think that may be what you talk about - the carpetbaggers went around making claims and registering them. Reclaiming the land lost to burned records...

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Masons are at the heart of Roman civilization. Mnason testified for Paul before the Sanhedrin, giving Paul the chance to flee conviction for treason, and he ran to Felix, the Roman Marshal in Tyre. I know this opens a whole new can of worms:


    I love how the Business Plan of Christianity misconstrues Paul's Roman citizenship to mean exactly what it has resulted in. Paul seems to have invented the Western rendition of Welfare State and Protective Custody of a non-compos mentis patient in ward.

    This seems to be extraordinarily important in viewing the domain of central banking, and what the fraudulent oaths of office hide from the layman finding of fact:
    the waiver does not rely on any of that. it was all prior to "from the beginning"

    Okay. I am going to accept your second assertion as true. The Waiver seems vacant of citation - a presumption God exists. "Here is a song by Maynard James about or to his mother on her deathbed. Maynard James is allegedly an atheist. So he sounds very spiritual but when you think of it in context, he is lovingly honoring his mother's religious beliefs.
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    No. I do not hope my spiritual path is cluttered up; but it is. I began in the early '90's posting this and that by way of declaration and demand at the county clerk and recorder. I have arrived now though; I know this because I have arrived over twenty times by now...
    Im not comprehending what you mean by "arrived" as far as I can tell, we arrive physically, only once and that is "from the beginning"
    maybe you are arriving multiple times but only on paper?




    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    I think that anybody can sign it. Can you wear the mantle of authority?
    not aware that i have any other choice.


    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    My being a Patroon, which has survey and even a remaining land claim on both Brooklyn and Manhattan helps immensely in my acceptance of the 1629 Charter (Survey) that says clearly, a perpetual inheritance. The Waiver you are working on is something quite similar, but more ethereal and metaphysical.
    "Patroon" is a title though and "my being" is not, this seems to be a conversion of sorts. onto paper so to speak.
    i can see how the waiver would seem "more ethereal and metaphysical" but that depends on our definition of "God"

    Exactly. History shows that Freemason WASHINGTON selected out Peter VAN PELT for some kind of special annointing at the end of the Revolutionary War. Your claim is indeed more powerful - the Image and Likeness of YEHOVAH. The mantle of authority is humility and service; a contradiction. Go figure!!

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    So I am helping you consider some of the components to inheriting an estate, according to trust law.

    I appreciate you for that. its a tough nut for me to crack for some reason.


    I may have been careless about my use of metaphysical. It strikes me that with a paper charter and the VAN PELT Milestone and a strip of land set aside for my Claim, still seems somewhat more Physical than trying to convince the World that the Bible is True.


    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Very true. Fear creates illusions. Police banging on the door creates fear.
    that might lead to a creation (of fear) but I wouldnt say they created that fear. I alone, am responsible for my fear.

    I misspoke - Makes fear; not creates fear.

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Compare this with criminal impersonation.
    but can a criminal truly steal our identity?

    More basically; can Fear generate anything but illusion? This is also the ACIM distinction between making and creating. One thing I find very interesting about the Voice calling itself Jesus is how consistent these terms are throughout the Text. And whenever Helen, Ken or Bill started editing the Text with their own philosophies the Voice would agitate Helen into putting it back.

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    You are quite welcome. Sorry I did not get back on this yesterday.
    Im just glad to see you engaging more here with myself and others and really appreciate that effort.

    thanks
    Last edited by David Merrill; 03-15-16, 06:04 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • george
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post

    God as Witness, detached. I AM/WE ARE the Witness. Fetch the Father, Son and Spirit by birthright.
    Kurt does not rely on metaphysics and such, he is writing about the physical creator(s), the living God. youd probably have to listen to him explain the waiver to comprehend it but basically all those capable of creating are God(s) including those who were present from the beginning (upon the physical man exiting the birth canal) this would be the doctor, docs helpers, mom, dad, anyone present when we were born.




    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Sworn - as found in the attachment.
    attestation is swearing?





    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Treaties being burned?
    all records, everything in the court houses and other large family houses so many of southern heritage have no way to trace their heritage. I suspect this is the main reason this tactic was preformed.



    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Masons are at the heart of Roman civilization. Mnason testified for Paul before the Sanhedrin, giving Paul the chance to flee conviction for treason, and he ran to Felix, the Roman Marshal in Tyre. I know this opens a whole new can of worms:


    I love how the Business Plan of Christianity misconstrues Paul's Roman citizenship to mean exactly what it has resulted in. Paul seems to have invented the Western rendition of Welfare State and Protective Custody of a non-compos mentis patient in ward.

    This seems to be extraordinarily important in viewing the domain of central banking, and what the fraudulent oaths of office hide from the layman finding of fact:
    the waiver does not rely on any of that. it was all prior to "from the beginning"


    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    No. I do not hope my spiritual path is cluttered up; but it is. I began in the early '90's posting this and that by way of declaration and demand at the county clerk and recorder. I have arrived now though; I know this because I have arrived over twenty times by now...
    Im not comprehending what you mean by "arrived" as far as I can tell, we arrive physically, only once and that is "from the beginning"
    maybe you are arriving multiple times but only on paper?




    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    I think that anybody can sign it. Can you wear the mantle of authority?
    not aware that i have any other choice.


    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    My being a Patroon, which has survey and even a remaining land claim on both Brooklyn and Manhattan helps immensely in my acceptance of the 1629 Charter (Survey) that says clearly, a perpetual inheritance. The Waiver you are working on is something quite similar, but more ethereal and metaphysical.
    "Patroon" is a title though and "my being" is not, this seems to be a conversion of sorts. onto paper so to speak.
    i can see how the waiver would seem "more ethereal and metaphysical" but that depends on our definition of "God"

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    So I am helping you consider some of the components to inheriting an estate, according to trust law.
    [/quote]

    I appreciate you for that. its a tough nut for me to crack for some reason.


    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Very true. Fear creates illusions. Police banging on the door creates fear.
    that might lead to a creation (of fear) but I wouldnt say they created that fear. I alone, am responsible for my fear.



    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Compare this with criminal impersonation.
    but can a criminal truly steal our identity?



    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    You are quite welcome. Sorry I did not get back on this yesterday.
    Im just glad to see you engaging more here with myself and others and really appreciate that effort.

    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by george View Post
    where do you see that? (God outside)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Waiver.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	133.8 KB
ID:	42096

    God as Witness, detached. I AM/WE ARE the Witness. Fetch the Father, Son and Spirit by birthright.



    Originally posted by george View Post
    what kind of survey?
    Sworn - as found in the attachment.




    Originally posted by george View Post
    and also maybe even those whos heritage was stolen from them by burning Atlanta and surrounding areas too?
    Treaties being burned?

    Originally posted by george View Post
    its interesting one, Boris had posted that on his site a few weeks ago. I passed it on to a couple of attorneys I know, they enjoyed it and maybe even learned something from it.
    Masons are at the heart of Roman civilization. Mnason testified for Paul before the Sanhedrin, giving Paul the chance to flee conviction for treason, and he ran to Felix, the Roman Marshal in Tyre. I know this opens a whole new can of worms:


    Click image for larger version

Name:	Sexton v. Wheaton 1827.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	92.7 KB
ID:	42098

    I love how the Business Plan of Christianity misconstrues Paul's Roman citizenship to mean exactly what it has resulted in. Paul seems to have invented the Western rendition of Welfare State and Protective Custody of a non-compos mentis patient in ward.

    This seems to be extraordinarily important in viewing the domain of central banking, and what the fraudulent oaths of office hide from the layman finding of fact:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	grant of PoA to banks lunatics.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	23.6 KB
ID:	42099

    Originally posted by george View Post
    hard to read you sometimes but I think youre saying you also hope your spiritual path is cluttered with things others have documented? you did say in another thread you like when I share what I gleaned.
    No. I do not hope my spiritual path is cluttered up; but it is. I began in the early '90's posting this and that by way of declaration and demand at the county clerk and recorder. I have arrived now though; I know this because I have arrived over twenty times by now...


    Originally posted by george View Post
    Ive often wondered about that.. can only patroons sign that same declaration, or can anyone?

    I think that anybody can sign it. Can you wear the mantle of authority? My being a Patroon, which has survey and even a remaining land claim on both Brooklyn and Manhattan helps immensely in my acceptance of the 1629 Charter (Survey) that says clearly, a perpetual inheritance. The Waiver you are working on is something quite similar, but more ethereal and metaphysical. So I am helping you consider some of the components to inheriting an estate, according to trust law.


    Originally posted by george View Post
    I cant imagine there is any other way.. seems to me, without love, there is no creation.
    Very true. Fear creates illusions. Police banging on the door creates fear.

    Originally posted by george View Post
    hmmm.. name theft maybe.
    Compare this with criminal impersonation.


    Originally posted by george View Post
    thanks
    You are quite welcome. Sorry I did not get back on this yesterday.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 03-15-16, 03:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • xparte
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • george
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    With what I know now, the Waiver identifies you individually and special in relationship to God outside yourself.
    where do you see that? (God outside)

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    I have seen this before and feel there should be a survey.
    what kind of survey?

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    I have seen the King James Gutenberg edition filed at the Library of Congress cited (incun.1454.b5) for the monument/survey.
    hmm?
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    I think this is for those who either do not have a significant heritage or do not like it broadcast in cyberspace.
    and also maybe even those whos heritage was stolen from them by burning Atlanta and surrounding areas too?

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    However, I rethink the King James Version in light that King James I of England was formerly King James VI of Scotland; importing Scottish Rite Freemasonry to England. Of which I never really got to overthinking until yesterday when somebody shared the attached document on the brain trust.
    its interesting one, Boris had posted that on his site a few weeks ago. I passed it on to a couple of attorneys I know, they enjoyed it and maybe even learned something from it.


    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Otherwise my hope is that your Spiritual Path serves you well, and that mine is completely cluttered up with things like that Waiver -
    hard to read you sometimes but I think youre saying you also hope your spiritual path is cluttered with things others have documented? you did say in another thread you like when I share what I gleaned.

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    so much so that I could not tell you if being a Patroon or signing the Declaration has really meant anything to anybody but me.

    Ive often wondered about that.. can only patroons sign that same declaration, or can anyone?

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Knowing what I know now though, just be creative and love doing so, as you do it.

    I cant imagine there is any other way.. seems to me, without love, there is no creation.

    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    P.S. Posting I reread the title of the thread. "Before they do..." If anybody lays claim to your name, that is identity theft. At least if it effects your ability to make claim in your name.
    hmmm.. name theft maybe.


    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    With what I know now, the Waiver identifies you individually and special in relationship to God outside yourself. I have seen this before and feel there should be a survey. I have seen the King James Gutenberg edition filed at the Library of Congress cited (incun.1454.b5) for the monument/survey. I think this is for those who either do not have a significant heritage or do not like it broadcast in cyberspace.

    However, I rethink the King James Version in light that King James I of England was formerly King James VI of Scotland; importing Scottish Rite Freemasonry to England. Of which I never really got to overthinking until yesterday when somebody shared the attached document on the brain trust.

    Otherwise my hope is that your Spiritual Path serves you well, and that mine is completely cluttered up with things like that Waiver - so much so that I could not tell you if being a Patroon or signing the Declaration has really meant anything to anybody but me. Knowing what I know now though, just be creative and love doing so, as you do it.



    P.S. Posting I reread the title of the thread. "Before they do..." If anybody lays claim to your name, that is identity theft. At least if it effects your ability to make claim in your name.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 03-14-16, 11:47 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • george
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    Express Trust - now all I have to do is Imply my Trust. Walk it out. If my deeds don't match my words, well .....you get the picture.

    [ATTACH]1897[/ATTACH]

    My creation / My Form / My Expressed Trust / My Honor

    Shalom
    Michael Joseph
    I almost overlooked that that was not their form, but yours. it looks so formal too.

    most are using state issued forms to file DBA. others are saying dont use notaries too though for the same reasoning ( i think anyway) that you do not use their forms but you have used the notary here.

    is the register of Deeds the place to file stuff and get it on the record or could one utilize the misc. case file for this as well? probably not but worth asking. Im trying to formulate a plan to get as much done in one go as possible.

    thanks
    Last edited by george; 03-14-16, 11:34 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X