Presenting Driver License Card

[David Merrill]

I have to thank you David for getting my bearings right, I made a mistake by even acknowledging the statute is valid, when in reality statutes are void since the Const. is void by and because of the saving to suitors clause right? please clearify my mistake so i can fix them,

I can't quite make any sense of that. I believe a common misconception is that one is party to the contract and therefore has a stake and claim in the actual Constitution itself. Once an official has sworn out an oath, he is obligated by undertaking to respect the Bill(s) of Rights as he swears to.

[Christopher-T:Farley]

Okay, So I had taken in a lot of information from certain wording I picked up and researched from all posts posted today, I thank you, and will do the same. please, correct my understanding... I walk into bank of america open a non-intrest bearing checking account... without my SSN in accordance with CFR. I do however have a photocopy of its license and ss card and on the photocopy i wrote attached to Security Agreement #CTFxxxx and attched to Affidavit of ones true identity and backed up with treasury form requiring a meddalion stamp since banks handle securities and im also demanding lawful money. so in the trust i will have my fed res. bank (corralates with letter on back of ss card) as the Settlor, the Treasury (Jack Lew) fiduxiary and trustee, my true name as co-Trustee and the Debtor (all Cap) as beneficiary and my true name as co-beneficiary? I formulated this from the article I read from above post regarding CQVT from Micheal, thank you by the way, i heard a click by the 5th sentence. so please help me with mistakes in that formula. also, I dont celebrate holidays--everyday is mother and father day, however I do have a son and appreciate your kindness.

David,

I also ask you for correction also, I have a hard time with the Constitutional beliefs, Our constitution has been "ratified" so many times how can it be functional?

[Christopher-T:Farley]

Am I asking the wrong question maybe? How can I claim title to the CQVT with the -1 form while establishing the trust with that claim?

[allodial]

Which brings up the question, Who trains the police?

[ATTACH]4149[/ATTACH]

He either does not know the law, or has obviously broken it from allegedly taking up office!

Or better yet, who misleads and misinforms the police? Or .. who indoctrinates with police for Metro? Likely, he knows the law but does not want to be under any law (i.e. men of lawlessness).

[David Merrill]

David,

I also ask you for correction also, I have a hard time with the Constitutional beliefs, Our constitution has been "ratified" so many times how can it be functional?

This is a simple process.

The newly elected or appointed official has thirty days to swear out an oath of office according to law, or his office is vacant. If he continues to operate de facto, that is okay but when somebody calls him on it, then he must get it corrected fast.




A suitor demanded a Certificate of Fact that there was no oath of office and this showed up by the next morning.

For no reason, so far as term goes, he changed it to ALL UPPER CASE lettering shortly thereafter.



Then as I began putting the pressure on him with a $20M lien he Found God:





By looking carefully you can see how this Attorney General was trying his best not to bond himself to the oath, or the office to the comptroller of the state treasury.

Here is what he was supposed to do all along:

[David Merrill]

This self-flagellation seems to stem from the misconceptions about the municipal corporation forming in 1871. I took a look at the city council and did not recognize any of them. Washington DC is operating like any home rule city and town in America.

I do find it rather disturbing that there is a flurry of delusion about what the trust structure of "statesman" and "judge" really is. And so we can follow a quick cyber-bunnyhole.

Here the Maine Republic is attempting to launch disinformation from my YouTube video:

https://youtu.be/DU6fxC5CXMg

The Republics quickly lead to an interview with somebody named "Judge Anna":

HOSTESS: Great, I'm so glad you're on.
JUDGE ANNA: Well, I'm pleased to be here.
HOSTESS: Yes. You've been extremely brave to process the paperwork that you've been
processing. Like a lien against the American BAR Association. That was wonderful.
I mean, it was long overdue. I'm also glad you did it.
2 of 16
JUDGE ANNA: Well, I can't take a whole lot of credit for that. My expertise is not commercial
law. I'm kind of a neophyte in terms of commercial law. The lien was actually written by
Judge Steve Curry of Colorado and he has that particular expertise, and the rest of us
signed on to basically protect him and to stand up for what we believe to be the truth.
So I was kind of a follower more than a leader in that effort,

Colorado Superior Judge Curry Issues Orders to Sheriff Diggins: Magistrate Carey Charged with operating a private court? Impersonating a Lawful Government Officer?

Well it turns out that he plead out easy, for a year of community service; I suppose his worst hell, voluntary slave labor. Now he gets to work for the corporate state, at no wage! What a cruel judge...

So he called them on it, and he was brought into court, charged falsely on the part of
corrupt local officials, and he was charged by their corporate court with a year of community
service for his supposed crime of objecting to their criminality, and he did not serve
that year of community service so then they charged him with a parole violation and brought
him back in and they have him in jail for this ridiculous situation right now. It's crazy.

Of course they won't even let me post comments about posting my YouTube video. They are apparently just too busy.

I wont spend a lot of time trying to explain. Attached please find my very emotional appeal that saved Ron a lot of prison time. This whole republics thing is an intelligence mill to get information about disgruntled Americans into the CIA and FBI - addresses, phone numbers, job information... And the sad part is most of the people providing indictments on themselves are not really any threat to government or civil peace and safety.


I suppose that my point is in any amicus curiae rules one finds restrictions about who can file one with the court. One party that can file an amicus curiae without the consent of all parties is a State.




And please note that it was filed and published without delay or question:

[allodial]

Well the fact that RAP/TRAP wasn't about pushing folks to look at the original jurisdiction is telling. Also, it might be worth viewing any attempt to form a state named "Republic of Maine" or "Maine Republic" (a name) in the U.S. State of Maine in light of a Civil War issue concerning West Virginia statehood and other Virginia-related state formation issues at the start of the Civil War: Statehood for West Virginia: An Illegal Act? A key significance of the article is how an attempt to thwart Virginia secession was made by reforming a State of Virginia or something like that and how that led to West Virginia--as in the legal mechanics.

Consider the notion of the U.S. Department of Justice having been established (in 1870 or 1871) for a single and exclusive purpose: prosecution of war (i.e. the Civil War and subsequent wars).



Consider for lucidity's sake that a proper conservator of the peace might simply assert the law while a soldier in the field (military-revenue district) operating under rules of war might feel free to use (tRAPs/RuS#Es) deception and ruses (short of actual perfidy--or so we'd like to believe). TT's attempt to put a Christian orthodox twist on the Federal Zone makes little sense if you perceive it as a container for the stranger.

Their insistence on having a capital for "the" Republic or restoring "the" Republic is a noisy fart in the face of original jurisdictions. You hear nothing of the several republics only of a singularity which was never the original arrangement--there are various reason I perceived TT being knowingly and willingly involved in creating a false movement: "its a tRAP to get a RAP". From what I could gather he was intercepting reports of actual, valid lawful remedy and creating crippled sound-alike false remedies in order to put bad taste in the mouth of police in order to conspire against lawful remedy and piss police off. From what I gather now, that he may have been doing that with FBI assistance is simply disdainful. I simply fail to recall sh#t disturbing being a power, right or duty of any officer of the United States.

[allodial]

I have to thank you David for getting my bearings right, I made a mistake by even acknowledging the statute is valid, when in reality statutes are void since the Const. is void by and because of the saving to suitors clause right? please clearify my mistake so i can fix them,

Allodial, yes my addresses are not conflicting, im in c/o. thats it.

Im trying to upload some of my paperwork to example my idea. im not to computer savvy outside of microsoft word etc. my biggest problem is trying to file all my paperwork and need frns to do it, yet, I am in conflict cause im using them to file paperwork that states thery're essentially valueless, which is not taking away any authenticity of the statement cause its factual. its just a catch 22, So ii wants to create a trust as the Settlor and the Trustee (SPC) uses the lien to file in the trust? indemnity bond, -1, security agreement. etc. While the SPC is also Beneficiary of the trust itself. oh and I ordered it a new birth certificate to do the process and my name is like this <<<Christopher T Farley>>> why? I did send my other one to the treasury, I feel so upset with myself how wrong i did the process, I guess the situation I just wanted to notify everyone right then and there i didnt research proper notification procedures, considering the circumstances.

I'm not completely sure of your comprehension of the jurisdictional issues or of your political status. I might expect a U.S. citizen to adhere to applicable laws, for example. As in who am I to tell you who or what you are?

[walter]

This will help explain the different jurisdictions.

Blacks 4th

[Binbokusai Yagyuu]

Fishing is SPORT - .

Fishing is a Commercial activity in my "STATE"