The Certificate of Live Birth is a Pledge Document

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • EZrhythm
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 257

    #1

    The Certificate of Live Birth is a Pledge Document

    The Certificate of Live Birth is a pledge document providing value to the corporate FEDERAL/STATE agencies every time it is used, a "benefit" obtained or a charge is made to the NAME, commercial, civil or criminal.

    The Birth Certificate is the certifying document that the pledge exists/was made.

    Definition of PLEDGE

    1a : a bailment of a chattel as security for a debt or other obligation without involving transfer of title
    b
    : the chattel so delivered
    c
    : the contract incidental to such a bailment


    2a : the state of being held as a security or guaranty
    b
    : something given as security for the performance of an ac

    Definition of BAIL

    transitive verb
    : to deliver (personal property) in trust to another for a special purpose and for a limited period

    Definition of CHATTEL

    : an item of tangible movable or immovable property except real estate and things (as buildings) connected with real property

    Hence the NAME is PLEDGED as BAIL and used as CHATTEL.

    Colonel Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people. He stated, in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson
    (President 1913 - 1921),

    Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property
    (that's you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency.
    Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges.
    They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges.
    This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office (presidency) of our dummy corporation(USA) to forment this plot against America. -
    Colonel Edward Mandell House
    Last edited by EZrhythm; 06-15-11, 06:41 AM.
  • David Merrill
    Administrator
    • Mar 2011
    • 5949

    #2
    I disagree. There may be an inherent factor because of SDR's but the Birth Certificate itself says nothing regarding it being a bail pledge.



    The driver license is a bail though. It says nothing about that on the license but the state you are in considers it of value to you, if you carry one for about $250 in value. That is why the police officer lets you go on a bail of about that much every traffic ticket you drive away from.

    I know a fellow who started challenging jurisdiction - about a year back - and he received notice that there was a warrant on him, in the mail. He thought there must be a mistake but they told him his bail was set at $250, payable only by Pay to the Order of... a check! He would have gone to jail but instead sat in custody while somebody came downtown to pay his bail. The magistrate determined that this man was a Sovereign Citizen and put no value on his driver license.

    With the birth certificate endorsement is the bail value. That value is derived by how many people place value in their birth certificates, not by an account like I have demonstrated through a Canadian financial official above. Social Security is all one account and records of people putting trust into that one account. SDR's are a fictional currency basket of five exemplary nations and the value of the SDR's are determined by collateral unanimous declaration of conditioning to endorse the central bank - the Fed around here in America. As people decline to post bond/bail here in the West, BRICS formed.

    Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

    It looks like the authorities in Brazil and Russia intercepted the letters after they cleared Customs.

    EG415704775US (Brazil), customs declaration LC64310812US
    EG415704761US (Russia), customs declaration LC643410826US
    EG415704758US (India)
    EG415704744US (South Africa)


    The USDC was sent certified mail, 7010 2780 0002 7566 2889.
    Attached Files
    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
    www.bishopcastle.us
    www.bishopcastle.mobi

    Comment

    • allodial
      Senior Member
      • May 2011
      • 2866

      #3


      Or more likely, a birth certificate is a charter document which gives the entity or entities chartered certain powers or rights concerning a State/Province. The B/C in the Canadian Provinces is more likely a share in the Province rather than in Federal Canada. The numbers on back are serial numbers as in a stack of blanks all have a serial number on the back of them. As they are printed off on a custom basis, the serial numbers are control numbers are likely sequential.

      With the birth certificate endorsement is the bail value.
      The value of a BC more likely actually comes from 'doing business' in, through or under the associated entity or entities. The more cars, bank accounts and the lke that you register under the BC...the more value perhaps? Transfer of energy to or through the entity in some manner voluntarily by "you".

      The Certificate of Live Birth is a Pledge Document
      On in as much pledging comes from ....you.
      Last edited by allodial; 06-02-11, 02:35 PM.
      All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

      "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
      "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
      Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

      Comment

      • David Merrill
        Administrator
        • Mar 2011
        • 5949

        #4
        Originally posted by allodial View Post


        Or more likely, a birth certificate is a charter document which gives the entity or entities chartered certain powers or rights concerning a State/Province. The B/C in the Canadian Provinces is more likely a share in the Province rather than in Federal Canada. The numbers on back are serial numbers as in a stack of blanks all have a serial number on the back of them. As they are printed off on a custom basis, the serial numbers are control numbers are likely sequential.



        The value of a BC more likely actually comes from 'doing business' in, through or under the associated entity or entities. The more cars, bank accounts and the lke that you register under the BC...the more value perhaps? Transfer of energy to or through the entity in some manner voluntarily by "you".


        On in as much pledging comes from ....you.

        I think you have said the same thing more eloquently.

        That doing business begins cashing or depositing for check transfer, your paycheck. The signature happens on the backside - endorsement. The fractional lending you endorse creates new bills to lend and lubricates new business (while depreciating the value of the bills and devaluing the stock/bond bail). Twenty years ago the bail amount on the driver license was likely half - more like $120.
        www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
        www.bishopcastle.us
        www.bishopcastle.mobi

        Comment

        • shikamaru
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 1630

          #5
          I would like to point out that registering of names is not a common law custom.
          In common law, you can have any name or as many as you like so long as one is not engaged in fraud (learned courtesy of Am. Jur.).

          I tend to think of one's birth certificate as an account.
          An account is a chose in action.
          Charges and the like are assessed against the account.

          One could think of the birth certificate as the establishment of one's trade name.
          One could be a sole proprietor.
          Last edited by shikamaru; 06-02-11, 04:34 PM.

          Comment

          • allodial
            Senior Member
            • May 2011
            • 2866

            #6
            The birth/berth is being registered not names. Similar or equivalent:
            • corporate charter
            • statement of origin






            Note: one prominent feature in all images above is one or more common seals.

            Keep in mind that according to one or more dictionaries that the word 'birth' is held to be synonymous with the word 'origin'.

            ****


            Re chattel: apparently you can choose to make yourself chattel.
            Last edited by allodial; 06-02-11, 05:42 PM.
            All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

            "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
            "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
            Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

            Comment

            • Darkcrusade
              Member
              • Mar 2011
              • 65

              #7

              Comment

              • shikamaru
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2011
                • 1630

                #8
                Originally posted by allodial View Post
                The birth/berth is being registered not names.
                What is an event without its title?

                When one wants to change "their name", they are directed to do so at the nearest Probate Court .....
                Last edited by shikamaru; 06-02-11, 11:21 PM.

                Comment

                • Richard Earl
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 119

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Darkcrusade View Post
                  Who holds the original? Where was the Birth certificate delivered to?
                  Your mother delivered a statement of live birth - witness to an event. They certify the statement and send you a certificate of birth?

                  Comment

                  • Reigne
                    Junior Member
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 13

                    #10
                    I agree the BC is a 'registering/reporting' an event.

                    Without that 'event' occuring, you can't opt into SS, DL, etc. I am beginning to believe it IS a form of identification (whereas SS is NOT to be used as ID).
                    This is the conundrum I find myself in - IF the BC is actually a form of ID, then using it to obtain anything else would be a crime right? And if it is NOT a form of ID, then using it to obtain anything else would be a crime ... Is it possible to commit Identity Theft on oneself?

                    But then I found this today:
                    USC Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 1 Section 9
                    Vessel of the United States defined.
                    The term “vessel of the United States”, as used in this title, means a vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States, or any citizen thereof, or any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof.
                    (emphasis mine)
                    So now I'm back to the whole birth/berth thinking again ... however, a birth/berth is not the only way to become a US citizen (ie: naturalization - I'd really like to see the paperwork -front and back - that they fill out).
                    April Reigne

                    Comment

                    • Trust Guy
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2011
                      • 152

                      #11
                      Off subject , but interesting . There is emphasisUnited States Code: Historical Outline and Explanatory Notes - Prepared by Richard J. McKinney, Assistant Law Librarian, Federal Reserve Board, for Law Librarians' Society Program, November 9, 2004
                      Last Revised in June 2011

                      6) In 1919, Col. E. C. Little, Chairman of the House Committee on the Revision of Laws began the work to codify U.S. law, appointing Prof. William Burdick of Kansas as Reviser. Others aided.

                      7) The completed work was introduced as H.R. 9389 (60 titles) in the 66th Congress and passed the House on Dec. 20, 1920 (60 Cong. Rec. 571-574). Bill died in Senate. (s.a. H. Rept. 781, 2 pts.).

                      8) Bill reintroduced with corrections in the 67th Congress as H.R. 12 and it passed the House unanimously on May 16, 1921 (61 Cong. Rec. 1479), but again it died in the Senate after being debated in the House and Senate (64 Cong. Rec. 2084, 2090, 2846, 3137, 5019, 5087-5102; H. Rep. 68).

                      9) The bill, with an updated supplement, was reintroduced in the 68th Congress as H.R. 12 and unanimously passed the House on January 7, 1924 (65 Cong. Rec. 643, H. Rept. 2). It was referred to the Senate Committee on the Revision of the Laws where it was reported unfavorably on the grounds that it contained some 600 errors, omissions, and inaccuracies. Instead the Committee reported S.J. Res. 141 (S. Rept. 722), to establish a commission to revise laws. It passed the Senate (66 Cong. Rec. 3800) and was reported from House Committee (H. Rept. 1573) w amdts.

                      10) The two revision committees then employed staff members at West Publishing Co. and Edward Thompson Co. to do the work of codification using Little's work (60 titles) as a basis and checking with experts in law and government departments (see 67 Cong. Rec. 7787; H. Rept. 69-900).

                      11) In the 69th Congress, the new Code (laws in force as of Dec. 7, 1925) introduced as H.R. 10000 (50 titles), reported by the Committee (H. Rept. 900), debated and passed the House on Apr. 19, 1926 (67 Cong. Rec. 7787-7793) to be prima facie law until July 1, 1927. The Senate Committee reported it (S. Rept. 832). It was debated, amended and passed by the Senate (67 Cong. Rec. 9737, 10403, 10478, 10480, 11799, 11963, 11971) as prima facie evidence only. House concurred (67 Cong. Rec. 12076) and was signed by President on June 30, 1926 (44 Stat. pt. 1, Public No. 440).

                      12) The Code enacted no new law (not really), repealed no prior law and in cases of inconsistency the statutes were to prevail. However, like the Revised Statutes, which was enacted into positive law, the Code is to encompass the general and permanent laws authored by Congress (not private and local matters, nor annual appropriations). Some 537 errors were later found; 88 of them errors of substance. See H. Rept. 70-1706 to accompany H.R. 13622, a bill to provide Supplement I volume to Code (act of May 29, 1928, ch. 911, 45 Stat. 1008).
                      Not to be construed as Legal Advice, nor a recommended Course of Action. I will stand corrected.

                      Comment

                      • EZrhythm
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2011
                        • 257

                        #12
                        The birth event may occur for each registration but it is the NAME that is the property they want and the NAME that is pledged for their use. The state holds the original pledge document but only as a facsimile since the original wet ink copy isn't required for their use.
                        There is no account attached until the SSN is created.
                        The BC is not used as an ID, it is certification that the pledge was made.

                        Comment

                        • Reigne
                          Junior Member
                          • Jun 2011
                          • 13

                          #13
                          Thanks for sharing the info on the Senate records ;o)

                          Regarding the BC as Identification and that it is actually a record of an event ... I found this.

                          He talks about the BC being "ID" at about 2:30 into the vid

                          *Note: this is just 1 of 8+ videos he has up. While I do not agree with everything he says, the issue of BC being ID/the Foundational Document makes sense to me.
                          I still have not seen any evidence that the BC's are 'bonds/shares/etc (esp when folks say they are worth 1Million or 'unlimited' as some "gurus" have stated). If someone here has the evidence please show it to me or inform me of where I can go (internet) to find it.
                          April Reigne

                          Comment

                          • allodial
                            Senior Member
                            • May 2011
                            • 2866

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Reigne View Post
                            Thanks for sharing the info on the Senate records ;o)

                            Regarding the BC as Identification and that it is actually a record of an event ... I found this.

                            He talks about the BC being "ID" at about 2:30 into the vid

                            *Note: this is just 1 of 8+ videos he has up. While I do not agree with everything he says, the issue of BC being ID/the Foundational Document makes sense to me.
                            I still have not seen any evidence that the BC's are 'bonds/shares/etc (esp when folks say they are worth 1Million or 'unlimited' as some "gurus" have stated). If someone here has the evidence please show it to me or inform me of where I can go (internet) to find it.
                            You make up the value as you go along. Likely you can pledge as much as you'd like?

                            Originally posted by EZrhythm View Post
                            The birth event may occur for each registration but it is the NAME that is the property they want and the NAME that is pledged for their use. The state holds the original pledge document but only as a facsimile since the original wet ink copy isn't required for their use.
                            There is no account attached until the SSN is created.
                            The BC is not used as an ID, it is certification that the pledge was made.
                            The Birth Certificate signifies creation/charter and origin of a legal entity or the like. If one is convinced that one is the person therein named, then perhaps one is so convinced? A State driver license or State ID gives rise to creation of an account or accounts as well (think: State revenue department). The account at the Social Security Administration is distinct and different from the account at the IRS.
                            Last edited by allodial; 06-03-11, 04:58 PM.
                            All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

                            "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
                            "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
                            Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

                            Comment

                            • EZrhythm
                              Senior Member
                              • May 2011
                              • 257

                              #15
                              Colonel Edward Mandell House

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X