Terrible 1313 Revisited by Jo HINDMAN

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    I had not considered that people would be reading faster than I am. I will try moving a little faster.


    Top of Page 82:

    Charges of $300/day! For violations of the municipal code?

    Middle of Page 87:

    It (METRO) is a freewheeling oddity and, in practice, untouchable by the voters.


    Welcome UN combinatorial mathematics.


    P.S. Bottom of Page 90:

    We have mention of Colorado Springs and Luther GULICK again.



    Hello! Much tardy I am inserting Chapter 8 Here. Sorry about that!
    Last edited by David Merrill; 12-18-14, 10:03 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    What happened is that the bond was due in the amount of $5.5T and by the 2X Rule $11T was assessed (forgiven) from the Stock Market. I had not given a thorough assessment as to the parties except in terms of a jail bond. It is called Bail too.

    Leave a comment:


  • shikamaru
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Presuming the US government is a representative body politic the People issued the Bond.
    The issuer of a bond is the debtor.
    The receiver of a bond is the creditor.

    Who received the bond?

    Originally posted by David Merrill
    In the political structure more accurately - the Electorate. [Listen around Minute Mark 20.] It was redeemed by the US government in supersedeas fashion to prevent having to stay in jail. There are better examples where the US government relenquishes claim and therefore jurisdiction is lost. As it is called the National Debt and is formed through endorsement the electorate of the jurisdiction, the Federal Reserve System were the payer's of the bond.
    To redeem is to buy back. What exactly was conveyed or re-conveyed?
    The electorate is the accommodation party?

    If "the People" issued the bond with the FRS paying the bond, does that make the FRS surety for the bond?

    Originally posted by David Merrill
    In this context I should point out again that when a municipal organization, a city, grows to the boundaries of the county or borough the nature of the electorate becomes municipal. It ceases to be governed by the federal union of states and becomes Home Rule Cities and Towns. Or another way to say it is the endorsers of the jurisdiction; Congress' Fed, paid to save it presuming that they were the investors in the Stock Market.
    Domestic Law is also called Municipal Law in an International Law context.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by shikamaru View Post
    Add who issued the bond and who redeemed it ?

    Presuming the US government is a representative body politic the People issued the Bond. In the political structure more accurately - the Electorate. It was redeemed by the US government in supersedeas fashion to prevent having to stay in jail. There are better examples where the US government relenquishes claim and therefore jurisdiction is lost. [Listen to Minute Mark 20.] As it is called the National Debt and is formed through endorsement the electorate of the jurisdiction, the Federal Reserve System were the payer's of the bond.

    In this context I should point out again that when a municipal organization, a city, grows to the boundaries of the county or borough the nature of the electorate becomes municipal. It ceases to be governed by the federal union of states and becomes Home Rule Cities and Towns. Or another way to say it is the endorsers of the jurisdiction; Congress' Fed, paid to save it presuming that they were the investors in the Stock Market.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 12-30-12, 11:37 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • shikamaru
    replied
    Originally posted by Inhisimage View Post
    Please excuse my ignorance but when the U.S. "paid the bond", who did they pay it to? who received the funds? What became of the "money"?
    Add who issued the bond and who redeemed it ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Inhisimage
    replied
    Yes, Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    I am posting Chapter 7 before reading it myself.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Chapter 6 was very short. Page 77 tells us:


    Projected result is utter bankruptcy for the economy of the United States and ultimate extinction of every individual American right to own property.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    I like Chapter 5:



    On Page 69 in the middle we find mention of Colorado Springs as Parent Body of 1313. Footnote 17 leads me to believe I might find some interesting evidence by looking through the Archives in Aurora.
    This is definitely a significant find! What is special about Colorado Springs is that on the West Side is (Old) Colorado City - the first capital of Colorado in 1861, linking it with MJ's contribution. Territorial Governor GILPIN (1861) made a significant contribution to the fiat history of American currency by issuing notes to pay the Union soldiers who spent the notes with merchants etc. and the merchants of course wanted money in redeemed notes. There was quite a stink that I will go into or link because I have covered that many times already.

    Another interesting facet is my studies about the formation of the Territory itself at the federal repository on the SE Corner of the Golden Rectangle of Masonic Monuments. I was unwittingly a protoge of the Second Chair for the California Jurisdiction - whatever that means to a Mason. Interestingly when I uncovered the history around Colorado being more a war chest than a Territory in preparation for the 1876 State, he began to become very short-tempered and even fighting mad with me. I felt that there was something to it but it took a few years to piece things together about what this would mean to him.

    I will lay it out as we go, hopefully in terms laid out in the book.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    It may not be clear what you are looking at in the photo above - the Municipal League Archives on the second floor of the University of Colorado - Denver campus library. Look to the far end above and there are doors into the Archives partition way down there. I took this first photo below back in the direction you are looking from, inside the archives area. If you look to the ceiling features you might get oriented correctly. Turning to the right as you enter from the small office at the far end is a typical shelf, the first aisle featuring the copier I was given free rein with. The doors at the end are in the background behind the computer screen, where the archiver had some of my docs on the screen.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 12-27-12, 11:42 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    I like Chapter 5:



    On Page 69 in the middle we find mention of Colorado Springs as Parent Body of 1313. Footnote 17 leads me to believe I might find some interesting evidence by looking through the Archives in Aurora.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 12-27-12, 08:28 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    I am pleased to see you enjoyed it. Thanks for pointing out your observations.

    The privilege in my family line, my heritage and perpetual inheritance


    This according to the Code of NY is the right to simply bill for a tort based in the facts. Like the true judgments we enjoy within the brain trust - res judicata until somebody can overturn the facts with more believable facts.


    Leave a comment:


  • Michael Joseph
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post

    I have particularly enjoyed Keith RICHARDS of Rolling Stone fame spoofing the heritage of the Dutch Indies Trading Company.

    It is humorous to me what pomp and pageantry surrounds THE CODEX. Notice the two OLD [implies wise] men who convey the Code to the Alter [table]. It has already been established that Force will be used to ensure the code is obeyed. But then, after all the pomp and pageantry, nobody is willing to ask who Created the Code and why they are Subject to the Code.

    In the stead, all fall silent at "Am I to understand that you will not be keeping to the Code?" Nobody wants a bullet in the head. And clearly the keeper of the Code is willing to stop at nothing to ensure its conformance. Of course IF the Codex was the Pirates Code and those at the Table were engaged in Piracy, then OF COURSE they were all subject to the Code.

    Notice the folly in the dog bringing the key.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by Inhisimage View Post
    Please excuse my ignorance but when the U.S. "paid the bond", who did they pay it to? who received the funds? What became of the "money"?
    Thank you for paying enough attention to form that question!

    The money vanished. It began as debt and was forgiven. Many people lost their jobs though. People felt the loss in their portfolios. In the tradition of governments, the US government suffered no loss - it simply paid the bailment so as to avoid arrest pending trial.

    I will develop waiver of tort later, I promise it will be coming up during my reading of the next chapters. This is my POSITION in VAN PELT. The numero-linguistics being Son (byn) of the Patroon (patron/palt) in the paleo-Hebrew found in Strong's Concordance. Waiver of Tort being my privilege to the CODE.

    I have particularly enjoyed Keith RICHARDS of Rolling Stone fame spoofing the heritage of the Dutch Indies Trading Company. Look at the first citation in the METRO 1313 - Head of the Beast article.






    P.S. Thank you MJ! That is a great article. The timing is wonderful too as a reminder to cover how Colorado, in that same timeframe was never cured properly a Territory, and instead functions as a war chest for funding GILPIN's notes. Behold - the beginning of the income tax year:





    P.P.S.

    Being written from an obviosly British perspective in early 1865 it would seem that the 59'ers of Colorado was completely overlooked as a contribution of gold.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 12-18-14, 09:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael Joseph
    replied
    Originally posted by Inhisimage View Post
    Please excuse my ignorance but when the U.S. "paid the bond", who did they pay it to? who received the funds? What became of the "money"?
    This is an interesting model - see attachment.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...