Please also try to get my point.
For example, did you make Notice and Demand before you understood your point above?
The remedy is between your ears. Making the demand is meaningless to many bankers. One bank made the point of saying "no legal effect" several times. So I get your point.
The Lesson Plan guides people through a journey to get where you are now. Even so, the Notice and Demand in some form or another has been proven effective to stave off assumptions of endorsement. And another point is that if you make your notice and demand to the Fed Bank, through the federal court, even publish it at the county recorder and serve it on your bank it is not very likely to get to your boss or cause any grief whatsoever.
In the exploration of grand jury formation for example, we need to raise the consciousness of people in general. The Notice and Demand and Libel of Review processes are great for doing that.
Regards,
David Merrill.
-
See post http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...ll=1#post12168
In particular, the blue wording highlghted and underlined below:
"... I have handwritten my exact specific declaration on the FACE of every check and deposit slip I issue.... just to make it CLEAR by a PREPONDERANCE of substantive evidence under their FRE Exception to Hearsay Rule 803(6)(B) that from that date onward "lawful money and full discharge is demanded for all transactions 12 USC 411, 95a(2)" applies to ALL transactions even if it is missing thereafter on transactions like direct deposits, debit/credit cards, EFTs, etc, where it is hard to make a record of one's demand. Remember, by making one's demand TRANSACTION-BASED, it does not matter what the signature card has on it or not. The account does not matter - BECAUSE YOU MADE YOUR DEMAND TRANSACTION-BASED - Please get this point! It is CRITICAL! One does NOT have to send letters to the bank, IRS, FRS, IMF, Treasury or Employer and thereby stir up needless trouble! Okay? IMHO - K.I.S.S."Leave a comment:
-
Thank you Robert Henry;
It is your mind that is great!
If you think about that you might gather that making a demand for lawful money does not actually result in the tender of lawful money. The US note is not a reserve currency yet Congress has finagled things so that the value of the US note is pegged to the diminishing value of the Federal Reserve note, which is not lawful money.
From there it may seem even more incredible.
Use the debit option and you will no longer be utilizing Credit from the Fed.
These habits, I call conditioning. Most times the belief sets we hold are precious and to be defended.
Your Credit Card as a Debit Card still holds your Credit Information. That should be no problem now that you are no longer using it as a Credit Card but you might let me know about any intrusion by the Federal Reserve System presuming you are still in contract.
Today's lesson in ACIM (A Course in Miracles) included:
For to recognize fear is not enough to escape from it, although the recognition is necessary to demonstrate the need for escape. The Holy Spirit must still translate the fear into truth. If you were left with the fear, once you had recognized it, you would have taken a step away from reality, not towards it. Yet we have repeatedly emphasized the need to recognize fear and face it without disguise as a crucial step in the undoing of the ego.
And from earlier:
Do not fear the Last Judgment, but welcome it and do not wait, for the ego's time is "borrowed" from your eternity.
It is your comprehension of truth and your pure trust that will establish the remedy. When it strikes you that you have been making a mistake, like today with the Credit Option simply seek to understand better.Leave a comment:
-
ATM card DEBIT vs CREDIT option
Hello all,
While filling up at the gas station today I realized my habitual use of the CREDIT option, as opposed to the DEBIT option, when using my ATM card.
I primarily started doing this way-back-when due to the higher limit allowed on withdrawal transactions using the CREDIT option, in my case 5000 vs 500, and it just became habit.
I'd like to ask the greater minds here to offer their thoughts on the possible ramifications of this vis-a-vis claiming redemption through lawful money.
My personal take on this is that my demand on the signature card attached to this account, in addition to my NaD served on the FED, should render any assumption of private credit usage moot but as I am yet a novice with this process, and with the recent discussions of making demand on a PER TRANSACTION basis (something I see no way to do with ATM card transactions where no paper signature is required), I'd like this thread to serve as consensus on this issue.
With gratitude,
Robert Henry
Leave a comment: