Tweet
So therefore this is the purpose of getting free of the Federal Reserve agreement by non-endorsement.
This, of course, seems to be a commercial agreement. But, IMO, there is problem with this concept. Though the Federal Reserve is private, it operates via special authority. That special authority emanates from government authority. I have read several cases that states that the fiduciary duty follows that governmental authority, no matter if it is wielded by private entities or not. So the fed, though private, also owes the same duties as the congress or any other part of the representative government. The only way I can see that the duty could be escaped, is either by denying the identity or status of the people, or denying the very governmental authority on which the fed operates. This 'agreement' is probably also evidenced by the very fact that the FRNs are only authorized for inter-bank transfers by the federal reserve banks. But that is only presumption that needs to be rebutted. By identifying ourselves as 'the people' or 'one of the people' with inalienable or unalienable rights, and claiming those rights on the record, then the nature the question and presumption is changed. Denying a contract, and denying any commercial aspect should completely eliminate any commercial presumption and return the question back to inalienable rights.
This Satan / God situation is eerily similar to the Government / People situation. IMO, the people just need to realize their place, as creator of government and hold government to their place, as a created servant of the people.
This, of course, seems to be a commercial agreement. But, IMO, there is problem with this concept. Though the Federal Reserve is private, it operates via special authority. That special authority emanates from government authority. I have read several cases that states that the fiduciary duty follows that governmental authority, no matter if it is wielded by private entities or not. So the fed, though private, also owes the same duties as the congress or any other part of the representative government. The only way I can see that the duty could be escaped, is either by denying the identity or status of the people, or denying the very governmental authority on which the fed operates. This 'agreement' is probably also evidenced by the very fact that the FRNs are only authorized for inter-bank transfers by the federal reserve banks. But that is only presumption that needs to be rebutted. By identifying ourselves as 'the people' or 'one of the people' with inalienable or unalienable rights, and claiming those rights on the record, then the nature the question and presumption is changed. Denying a contract, and denying any commercial aspect should completely eliminate any commercial presumption and return the question back to inalienable rights.
This Satan / God situation is eerily similar to the Government / People situation. IMO, the people just need to realize their place, as creator of government and hold government to their place, as a created servant of the people.
Comment