"Lawful Money" definition? attn:David

[george]

It might be worth considering the type of authority being wielded

always, and a major subject that requires more study. "authority"

If you want to be specific about lawful money you can say that you mean lawful money per the Coinage Act of 1792

thats good!

Congress says:
They (Federal Reserve notes from two sentences earlier) shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...[/I]

about that part in parenthesis, I recall that you had previously indicated that the "They" is the people and not the paper?

There was a guy who posted on one of the older sites who suggested the FRB to be a system for working black magic.

depending on the definition of black magic he could be right, seems to me its much worse than that though. the whole system/matrix seems to be.

I'm sorry you haven't found a solution nor success. No magic needed. The clues & keys are all over this website. Just start redeeming lawful money and the rest will likely fall into place. Look for posts by David Merrill & Michael Joseph and you're assured of value. Look, if someone as whimsical and crazy as me can become an 8-year success then there's hope for you too.

hi JohnnyCash thanks but your success is seemingly only a small part of David's philosophy/methodology. like I said before, its really not about the money but the "money" is the key.

You might consider that what it means to YOU is more important that what it means to THEM.

Glad to see others coming to comprehension and the word spreading.

This might help: http://www.morningliberty.com/2014/0...y-slave-notes/

hi Robert Henry,

that is most important but only to me and it doesnt translate.


thanks

[allodial]

This might help put things in perspective: Concentration camp money.

Related:

• Concentration Camp Money: 'Lagergeld' used to Pay Prisoners for Their Work
• lagergeld (definition)
• Theresienstadt (Terezin) Ghetto (World and Military Notes website)
• New World Banking Order?
• Star of Remphan/Ramadan?

[Robert Henry]

but only to me and it doesnt translate.

This sentiment, perhaps, expresses the root of the trouble.

All the "research" only yields the opinions of others. I believe that one can only come to comprehension through experience.

[shelbyz33]

Are the few people here that are having success with the redemption method, sending cover letters with their year end tax forms and stating their beliefs and explaining what they're doing??

[David Merrill]

I imagine that the "few people here" would answer that best.

My response is that there are many people now, who are not suitors in brain trust redeeming lawful money and receiving full refunds of withholdings. There is an innate sense of self preservation so that this will continue year after year and so they do not promote their success over the Internet.

I know this because as they get into other legal messes of various kinds they call on me about the other legal messes. So I walk them through becoming the court of record and we investigate oaths of office and examine the Register (summary) of Action and look for fatal flaws in process to put on the record so that the prosecutor/judge backs down for being a court not of record/vacant office whatever...

This is as it should be. I find it much more engaging to salvage children from Protective Services and such.

In answer to your question however, I think that some paychecks demonstrating non-endorsement are attached but I have long quit advising trying to explain law to attorneys. You waste your breath. The evidence repositories are almost exclusively for the testimony of the attorneys, mainly the ones wearing black robes.

[george]

It is about my thinking all right!

Congress says:

They (Federal Reserve notes from two sentences earlier) shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...
.

and/or:

quoted from this thread:

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showthread.php?1057-Moses-Was-Not-A-Magician&p=12340&viewfull=1#post12340

They are people in They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...

can you clarify this David, you seem to say/write in one quote its the notes then in another from a different thread they is the people?

please just expand on this very specifically and as much as possible.

I wont be able to get past this so please explain.

thanks

[JohnnyCash]

[george]

Refused for Cause see:http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...ll=1#post16398) post #18)


Doug555's compilation on this was helpful: http://lawfulmoney.blogspot.com/p/la...efinition.html

but it would still be helpful to me if David would respond to post #21 above. I think I got it now but that still puzzles me.

thanks

[george]

but it would still be helpful to me if David would respond to post #21 above. I think I got it now but that still puzzles me.

thanks

found this older post again from David where he goes into they as people more.

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showthread.php?1158-Redeem-From-Public-To-Private-Venue&p=13802&viewfull=1#post13802

why the confusion?