Exactly what does the IRS agent think?

[Chex]

However, even if only gold coins were in circulation in any given state or kingdom or forum, the sovereign or ruler of such is who says and thusly it is that authority that makes it money.

According to Webster's Dictionary, "sovereign" is defined as: 1. chief or highest; supreme. 2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others. 3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.

Probably no aspect of the American economy has strayed further from the Constitution congress the sovereign or ruler of such it was congress and the Board of Treasury most probably by us the people who in the Constitution stated what money is . This is a constitutional issue. The Constitution Congress http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...ency#Banknoteshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Note

*** All of this was already part of the law of the land when the Constitution was adopted. ***

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_currency you have Official user(s) and unOfficial user(s), lol.

[allodial]

According to Webster's Dictionary, "sovereign" is defined as: 1. chief or highest; supreme. 2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others. 3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.

Probably no aspect of the American economy has strayed further from the Constitution congress the sovereign or ruler of such it was congress and the Board of Treasury most probably by us the people who in the Constitution stated what money is . This is a constitutional issue. The Constitution is an extraordinary document.

Plenary power (U.S. Congress is said to have "plenary municipal authority" over the District of Columbia and over the territories of the United States). If you live within one of the 50 States of the Union then that plenary power might apply to you. AFAIK they ARE NOT necessarily legislating outside of territorial confines. And they aren't necessarily stopping you from leaving yours and coming *under* theirs. As a matter of fact they probably make a point to hand out invitations!

P.S. Congress itself is a creature of something, somethings or someone or someones.

Thank you! I believe that it is useful to think in terms of license. A license is the method by which we make illegal activity legal.

But perhaps equitable in a court of equity. The UCC focuses on 'value' which is assessed on a case by case basis (i.e. equity jurisprudence) even when you go to the store and decide that something is worth $___ or not.

I extend license to the Spiritual Leader in priestcraft (Vatican jurisdiction) over and infiltrating New Thought (teaching Unity) by not exposing him. His license in theory lasts as long as that, presuming any of the congregants care.

Priestcraft of a certain kind? For some reason I at this time recall someone relating the notion that the Soviet Model of computers was said to be one of strong centralization (thin clients connected to a massive central system) with the American model being one of proliferous distribution (i.e. powerful clients; peer to peer; aversion to strong centralization). Was Jesus Christ pointing to a strong centralization of authority or to distribution of authority?

[David Merrill]

Plenary power (U.S. Congress is said to have "plenary municipal authority" over the District of Columbia and over the territories of the United States). If you live within one of the 50 States of the Union then that plenary power might apply to you. AFAIK they ARE NOT necessarily legislating outside of territorial confines. And they aren't necessarily stopping you from leaving yours and coming *under* theirs. As a matter of fact they probably make a point to hand out invitations!

P.S. Congress itself is a creature of something, somethings or someone or someones.



[ATTACH=CONFIG]1341[/ATTACH]
But perhaps equitable in a court of equity. The UCC focuses on 'value' which is assessed on a case by case basis (i.e. equity jurisprudence) even when you go to the store and decide that something is worth $___ or not.



Priestcraft of a certain kind? For some reason I at this time recall someone relating the notion that the Soviet Model of computers was said to be one of strong centralization (thin clients connected to a massive central system) with the American model being one of proliferous distribution (i.e. powerful clients; peer to peer; aversion to strong centralization). Was Jesus Christ pointing to a strong centralization of authority or to distribution of authority?

Thank you dearly for those links! It validates how much time I have been spending in pursuit of this Vatican infiltration into New Thought. New Thought, Science of Mind and A Course in Miracles, especially the latter is actually built upon a sense of Unity.

But the cross of Christ forever wiped out all such distinctions. They were abolished and done away when the legal custodian delivered us to Jesus, and faith in Gods Son superceded that righteousness which is by deeds of the law.

I place before you the idea that this line of posts is quite fitting for this thread topic. - That the very idea of sacrifice and a bloodthirsty God of Abraham is quite a perverse thought process. The idea of Abram cutting his son Isaac's throat on Mount Moriah is a simple allegory for Love the LORD thy God with all thine heart.

I read something like that recently, a treatise imploring quite on an encouraging note that the Kingdom of Heaven was easily accessed simply by putting it vigilantly on your heart. Make finding the Kingdom your priority and it will be upon you now.

And now we dedicate buildings to God exactly as Solomon did in the days of spiritual adolescence, and men stand up and intone in sepulchral tones, "I was glad when they said unto me, Let us go up to the house of God."

Our clear connection of this priestcraft with the thread topic came clear to me around 1994. There was a short rash of churches being burned in the southern States. Robert RUBIN, then the Secretary of the Treasury declared the burnings an act of domestic terrorism. The term may have been invented at that time. What always caught my eye was how the Secretary of the Treasury was stepping up instead of some other political figure.

Please carefully consider this Indictment. Notice how RUBIN resigned in time for the 5:00 O'Clock News!

Furthermore - notice the effect the USGS testimony had upon the admiralty, the plenary municipal jurisdiction of METRO organization and compare to the plain mathematics.

Funny how the whole Sacrificial System was formalized around the Golden Calf incident - which involved the foiling of gold?

[David Merrill]

P.S. We find a big discrepancy for the layman to be swearing out oaths, while that is a function of bonding the officials to the Treasury in fidelity bond.

It may have been over a decade since I have signed my name on anything but my own process, except for forceful obligations proposed by the Booking Area of the local jail. - And those incidents leave me wanting a long hot shower.

[David Merrill]

Chex;


Your post fits nicely there. Thank you!

[allodial]

Our clear connection of this priestcraft with the thread topic came clear to me around 1994. There was a short rash of churches being burned in the southern States. Robert RUBIN, then the Secretary of the Treasury declared the burnings an act of domestic terrorism. The term may have been invented at that time. What always caught my eye was how the Secretary of the Treasury was stepping up instead of some other political figure.

In the State of Florida the State Treasurer / CFO is also the "go-to" guy for arson (Note: slide 5). Harming property or that of 501(c)(3) registrants in the State called United States might be in the domain of the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. Interesting though to consider a 501(c)(3) 'church': tax exemption, weekly swarms of cash coming in and being deposited... like..a bank.

[shikamaru]

The funny thing about computers is right now things are moving back towards strong centralization with cloud computing, virtualization, and such ....

[David Merrill]

The funny thing about computers is right now things are moving back towards strong centralization with cloud computing, virtualization, and such ....

Thanks Allodial - processing...

Shikamaru - like spiritual data?

[allodial]

Perhaps this might help ....

[David Merrill]

Okay... I get it.

[shikamaru]

Shikamaru - like spiritual data?

Nope ... more like all your data being on the cloud ... so govy can sniff at will ....

End terminals, to some degree, are moving back towards being dummy terminals ....

[David Merrill]

I think of that as de-centralization but I believe you have it better perceived:

Also, the choice must be made - are you serving God or Mammon?

Disqualified OrganizationsMandatory Exception from the Code for people like the Pope (Bishop of Rome), Mayor etc. - corporations sole.

I am sure if you search for The Good Church around here you will get the cites.

[allodial]

Nope ... more like all your data being on the cloud ... so govy can sniff at will ....

End terminals, to some degree, are moving back towards being dummy terminals ....

And perhaps less intelligent operators to boot (thin clients in the head)?

[David Merrill]

This is an interesting BUMP!

[froze25]

Updating you all.


This fellow got a latter about 45 days ago saying the IRS would be considering his Return for another 45 days. He sounded optimistic that the IRS will be sending his full Refund, however late.

I noticed how long the IRS contemplated sending him his Refund for the latter half of 2009:

What ever happened to this Suitors Refund, The offered him Half he did a R4C any word after?