Cornell Law website omits 12 USC 95a

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Christopher-T:Farley
    Member
    • Jun 2016
    • 33

    #46
    Gavilan,

    Thank you for that, I wasn't even aware of that word. let alone even existing in the black's law. however, per your information, and im sure you've seen my memorandum (above) I attempted to file, yet the clerk didn't and now there is a liabilty someone has to answer for again, I might be injured by such warrant or claim. Since i do have a certified mail receipt that I sent the paperwork to be filed for the person a presumed claim is against, I stated that I clearly challenge jurisdiction, (even though the person signed a court jugement due to lack of knoweledge a couple years back ) I stepped in, since i'm being injured due to this claim with support that jurisdiction can be challenged at anytime and where there is no juridiction all judgements are 'Void'. Well, I find myself in a position where they didn't honor that. If I file a Motion to vacate in support of lack of jurisdiction with the superior court, will they accept if I use there own 'statutes' and 'rules' and case-law however filing as a 3rd party and requesting individual 3rd party capasity? will I unknowingly sub-ject?

    Comment

    • Soulution
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2017
      • 23

      #47
      Originally posted by Gavilan
      Spoke to them, and supposedly the omission is per editorial action of the Law Revision Council due to being redundant with another portion of the code.
      The reason why Law Cornell and the gov website
      (2)Any payment, conveyance, transfer, assignment, or delivery of property or interest therein, made to or for the account of the United States, or as otherwise directed, pursuant to this subdivision or any rule, regulation, instruction, or direction issued hereunder shall to the extent thereof be a full acquittance and discharge for all purposes of the obligation of the person making the same; and no person shall be held liable in any court for or in respect to anything done or omitted in good faith in connection with the administration of, or in pursuance of and in reliance on, this subdivision, or any rule, regulation, instruction, or direction issued hereunder.
      Last edited by Soulution; 02-07-19, 03:56 AM.

      Comment

      • David Merrill
        Administrator
        • Mar 2011
        • 5949

        #48
        It no longer applies to banking. For the longest time (153 years) it applied to banking.
        www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
        www.bishopcastle.us
        www.bishopcastle.mobi

        Comment

        • Soulution
          Junior Member
          • Dec 2017
          • 23

          #49

          Comment

          • David Merrill
            Administrator
            • Mar 2011
            • 5949

            #50
            Thank you for asking. I like when people get interested enough to pay attention.

            FDR used the 1917 Statute for a bogus war against the Great Depression applying what was intended for foreign nationals on American soil to the US citizen in general, specifically those who might have alliances intended toward Germany. However this of course applied to US citizens who simply felt allied with their mother country. So its use was very sketchy but STOEHR v WALLACE in 1921 decreed the TWEA was only for wartime. So the question redacts to whether the Great Depression was an actual enemy of the state.

            The 153 is tricky because the effect happens in year 154, after 153 years and there is a 49th and 50th year following the seven year release, and the 50 year jubilee applied in the Delegation of Authority to the Triumvirate to execute the Super Jubilee - the 70th Jubilee (3,500 years) since the invasion of Canaan. Also, the Jubilee was in 2016, not the current 2019 so adjust for that to 1864.

            1861 plus 153 is 2014 plus the fallow years for 49 and 50 years according to Bible law. So add two years to 2014 and get 2016.

            To grasp this one really has to study the Bible as a history lesson covering the greater Mesopotamian region, including Canaan and Egypt. As technology and intelligence accelerates through Joseph's (FDR) extorted gold, and Moses' stolen, same gold utilized in the production of manna and the transceiver Tabernacle then we begin to see the recent cover up.

            George Walker BUSH Sr. was Director of Intelligence for a couple years in the '70's as we saw the Amendments to the Bretton Woods Agreements implementing Paper Gold - SDR's. Then we see the same BUSH as Bloodline President invade Kuwait - Ur of Chaldea in the early '90's destabilizing Saddam's regime. But the history was still revealing that the NEPHALIM have survived through the BRANCH or Stem of Jesse - the "sons of God" in Genesis 6 were still found in Canaan at Numbers 13:33. So George Walker BUSH Jr. invaded Babylon with Shock and Awe.

            Remember how the museums with the Bible Story relics were destroyed?

            Just as we were recovering the Bible Story from the wrath of commercial priestcraft the NEPHALIM bloodline did its very best to destroy the tracks leading to solving the mysteries in mass. I will scan a few pages from the Sword and the Grail book by Andrew SINCLAIR later today.
            Last edited by David Merrill; 02-28-19, 10:54 AM.
            www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
            www.bishopcastle.us
            www.bishopcastle.mobi

            Comment

            Working...
            X