What I have learned so far.

[DTBA]

I have my account agreement now. I may have to retract my statement about indorsement. However it is listed as restrictive legend. Below are the attached images.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5142 [/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5141 [/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5140 [/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5143 [/ATTACH]

[David Merrill]

Thank you for finding such valuable source material and posting it here!

[Chex]

So help me Godhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/951

https://www.assetprotectionatty.com/dean-v-united-states-irrevocable-trust-protects-against-federal-tax-lien/

Oaths and Bonds Fraud Corrupt Clerks Judges Courts. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQSffsd5w7c

Robb Ryder Judges Oath https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tK0wiHZxjEo

[marcel]

I'm sorry, your oath is invalid.
Please try your call again.

[DTBA]

Question. What is the main difference between a restrictive legend and an endorsement? I remembered reading the text but thought it was restrictive endorsement. 2nd, if the clerk is actually the judge then can't you just have the judge thrown out of the court and declare the clerk the rightful judge on the plane? 3rd, the judge needs an oath to hold office lawfully, do they have to present it upon request or is it lawful to demand such a presentation because we also need identification/honor-ship for our own verification that we are being treated with the right jurisdiction and law? I ask only because I have not read anything yet that states we have that right to do so. Not saying is doesn't exist, just saying I have not read it. 4th, How do we push the wrong jurisdiction back into there realm if we are found to be in the wrong playing field?

[lorne]

Captain's Log: stardate 41159.2
Entering the dog days of summer. There was a flurry but now little activity save a hundred some odd droids wandering voiceless. There's something going on here though, can't quite put a finger on it, something under the surface. And why are they so interested in such a remote and insignificant starbase? unless ...

CAPT: [pointing] Check this, the reagent misuses this word, every time.
SPOCK: Humans aren't perfect, Captain.
CAPT: looks like an idiot.
SPOCK: Literary idiot, perhaps.
CAPT: Unless ... [dramatic pause] it's INTENTIONAL.
SPOCK: What purpose would it serve?
CAPT: Purpose. Yes.
SPOCK: A marker, a code, a communication?
CAPT: And I think it's gonna be a long long time.

[marcel]

Are you Shatting me?

[ag maniac]

https://youtu.be/8f1CgJXkcUQ?t=23s

[lorne]

I shat you not.
Happy Forth of July!

[marcel]

Is that code?
Go fourth, and make suitors of all the land, ..

[DTBA]

I wish to humbly apologize if I have offended someone with my posts. I am sorry for any mis-information or incorrect word usage. However, that being said. I enjoy reading information and cross referencing it with real factual documentation. I post stuff I have read and intent to educate others what I have found out. A lot I have disproved but to post information and have others put there thinking caps on and start wondering, is this correct, is in my opinion a good way to start and learn.

I am very thankful to be on the forums though with like minded people. May God bless you all. And remember what God did for us. Jesus spilled one drop of blood for each and every one of us.

[David Merrill]

I wish to humbly apologize if I have offended someone with my posts. I am sorry for any mis-information or incorrect word usage. However, that being said. I enjoy reading information and cross referencing it with real factual documentation. I post stuff I have read and intent to educate others what I have found out. A lot I have disproved but to post information and have others put there thinking caps on and start wondering, is this correct, is in my opinion a good way to start and learn.

I am very thankful to be on the forums though with like minded people. May God bless you all. And remember what God did for us. Jesus spilled one drop of blood for each and every one of us.

I have been occupied, if not busy. So it may be my absence making you think some kind of offense?

I hope not.

[marcel]

It is like the attorney was doinking with the Pitney Bowes machinery! And the DoJ is saying they will get to it when they can? This is a FOIA appeal for viewing the oath of John Glover ROBERTS for crying out loud!!

The DoJ defaulted on 6/4 and so Judgment will come July 4.

This could be why your FOIA requests yield nothing:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/connecting-the-dots-behind-the-curtain/

[DTBA]

I have just read your response and thank you for that. I didn't really take anything anyone said as a direct offense. I may have interpenetrated what they were saying wrong. I just wanted to say I'm not trying to offend anyone for anything. I've read instances where people have gotten into heated discussions about the smallest things and wish not to partake in those type of actions. So the answer is no, you have not offended me. I enjoy discussions with you and anyone else who wish to post. I do not however wish to spread mis-information as that is why we are in this mess today or, cause a racket from my post. I wish to have ALL of my information challenged in it's validity.

Thanks again and God Bless

[DTBA]

Speaking of information, has anyone researched the Leahy amendment No. 2529 from the Congressional record on Nov 10th 1999? It seems to stem from the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1999 due to the International Law of bankruptcy 70 year charter. From what I have researched, the bankruptcy ended in 1999 and the seats of government had to vacate due to the United States no longer existing. The President seat is the seat to control or oversee the bankruptcy. This is what is stated in the record "Leahy amendment No. 2529, to save United States taxpayers $24,000,000 by eliminating the blanket mandate relating to the filing of tax returns." congressional record November 10, 1999 S14439. Thoughts?