The MENDOZA Order

[David Merrill]

I will have a warren earl burger, no onions.

And where exactly can i sell my birthright? I don't see any for sale. It's almost like there's effort to paint this guy as a kook. And he's going along with it.

I agree. He acquired the MENDOZA oath early at my suggestion. Yet he rode it out, with me learning all along the way - but to his detriment so far as refund of his withholdings and getting money instead of having to pay the IRS.

Yet he is very intelligent.

So something is up.

[David Merrill]

A woman is emailing, wondering why not file a suit to challenge the MENDOZA Order? I told her she should be careful who she listens to. If MENDOZA is not a judge, then his opinion is simply a personal comment. And since he fraudulently pretends to be a judge, there is very little merit.

[David Merrill]

Also - What Exactly Does the IRS Agent Think

Hello everybody;

I am posting my suspicion that John SCHLABACH is an agent provocateur. This is to say he is getting a break on past liabilities for generating case law against remedy, for the purpose of discouraging people searching the Internet about Redeeming Lawful Money.

I came across his case in Eastern Washington on PACER by accident. I do not believe that the IRS agents' strategy had anticipated my finding it in progress. So I told John early about MENDOZA being a bogus judge and encouraged him to enlist me to disqualify him on having a vacant office. At that time I recall finding his history with the IRS and realizing, "This guy is in big trouble already." So I had a sinking feeling that he would be available for exactly what is going on.

One suitor tells me,

It looks to me like that is exactly what it was about redeem in lawful money, they ruled aginst him last year 2018 but this year it was dropped i guess because of his appeals he filed.
I did find it on a google search of frivolous filing. Not sure what the besmirch remedy is.

The remedy is not to believe what you read on the Internet. MENDOZA is not a federal judge. He can judge in equity by consent of the parties and that is where John took it. I told him to be genuine in his efforts and principles he would need to disqualify MENDOZA before he lost in trial court. But now in hindsight I am convinced my suspicions have been truthful. John is hurting a lot less from the "loss" in (vacant) court because he played his role in generating rumors that besmirch a perfect absolute right to be redeemed from central banking dishonors.