Lawful Money Redeemer on the 1040, just got an unusual IRS letter

[teamsnowden]

I always send an addenda like this with my 1040, this is my 4th year doing so:


Today I got a weird little note from our friends at the IRS:

Dear Taxpayer:

Thank you for the inquiry dated May 1st, 2019.

We need more information to answer your questions.

Please explain your problem in detail and send us any information you believe would be helpful, such as copies of correspondence or notices relating to your situation.

We received a Demand for Lawful Money Reduction and Full Discharge Per 12 USC 411 & 12 USC 95a(2) request, but we don't know what to do.

Return this letter, with your original inquiry, within 30 days from the date of this letter. If we don't hear from you, we can take no further action on your account. We have enclosed an envelope for your convenience.

Thank you for your cooperation.

How should I approach this? Should I say "There are no problems, I have redeemed public money without a problem" or something more like contract law "Refusal for cause, without dishonor UCC 3-501." This is really the first hiccup that I've had in redeeming lawful money and submitting a 1040 (which I haven't figured out how to safely opt out of yet).

[lorne]

Cool. Could you scan that letter from the IRS for us? Just might frame that and put it on my wall.

Also, did you mail your 1040 return two weeks past the April 15th deadline?

[teamsnowden]

Well, that other thread I have about buying the house and getting a mortgage, the lender had me send in some forms in May about requesting my 1040 information. But my return was filed in April before the deadline.

[David Merrill]

I always send an addenda like this with my 1040, this is my 4th year doing so:




Today I got a weird little note from our friends at the IRS:



How should I approach this? Should I say "There are no problems, I have redeemed public money without a problem" or something more like contract law "Refusal for cause, without dishonor UCC 3-501." This is really the first hiccup that I've had in redeeming lawful money and submitting a 1040 (which I haven't figured out how to safely opt out of yet).

If there are no problems (refunded money due you) then you might allow the default. This is a difficult juncture, deciding whether to refuse for cause or not. An attorney writing the letter might convey authority to the IRS through you acquiescence.

[Christopher Thomas]

teamsnowden,

http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showthread.php?145-Exactly-what-does-the-IRS-agent-think&highlight=agent+think%3F

I think the above thread is a great one maybe to refresh thoughts with.

also,
congratulations with your new house. That is great. all I can really say as encouragement. is to keep doing what you are doing. if you believe to be redeemed than you are.

[Gavilan]

Call me naive, but I am inclined to believe the agent that wrote that he may, in fact, don't know what to do. Would I take it further or take no further action? Hmm, that is a good question, depending on how comfortable I am with my knowledge I could just send in a note saying thank you for your letter, there is no problem, but if one should arrise, I will be writing at such time. Else, if you are getting your refunds, why steer the pot?

[David Merrill]

Call me naive, but I am inclined to believe the agent that wrote that he may, in fact, don't know what to do. Would I take it further or take no further action? Hmm, that is a good question, depending on how comfortable I am with my knowledge I could just send in a note saying thank you for your letter, there is no problem, but if one should arrise, I will be writing at such time. Else, if you are getting your refunds, why steer the pot?

That is how I understand it.

I am intelligence nexus between many sensory nodes - suitors who have been through my Lesson Plan. This grooms the suitors in the brain trust for a basic foundation in remedy:

• true identity
• record forming - Refusal for Cause (R4C)
• redeeming lawful money

Like the thread here about Knowing Exactly what the IRS Agent Thinks I keep my finger on the pulse of IRS intelligence and counterintelligence. And this is being done before quite a retinue of judicial oversight. Keep in mind that there are no valid federal judges.

If nothing else then I am being entertaining a lot more than here at StSC. The $21 to the Dragon Court, registered in Budapest since 1408 is consideration and has been accepted for a while now, by several suitors with claims and refusing for cause.

So it makes sense that the IRS attorneys are prescribing non-committal gibberish to the agents for mailing. The letter really says nothing but if the recipient would like to stir up problems by explaining the law to the IRS, then go ahead. There is an implication that the IRS is in authority over the redeemed that makes me a little uncomfortable and so I must leave it up to the recipient's gut. Hopefully they know what to do and have some self-actualization skills; like the Lesson Plan.


P.S. Twice lately suitors have received Notice that there tax liability has been sold to a debt scavenger. This means that the IRS is out; off the matter. The IRS has sold the debt and accepted consideration.

So if you were a debt scavenger buying up accounts receivable for 1/10 of the billing amount would you pursue it after seeing your first attempt at collection timely refused for cause and published on PACER, and sent to the above address list? It may not be as good as a full refund of withholdings but it is a good step in that direction, to have the IRS admit there is no more tax liability. The FrivPen has been sold and it is no longer in the IRS hands.