If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. If you would like to post in these forums please send a PM directly to David Merrill.
All transactions on PayPal and elsewhere are demanded to be redeemed in lawful money as found in Section 16 of the Fed Act and at Title 12 USC 411.
Thank you so much for enjoying StSC! If you are getting popups please try clearing your browser cache.
The legend lives on from the Chippewa on down
Of the big lake they call Gitchi gumee
The lake, it is said, never gives up her dead
When the skies of November turn gloomy.
First time redeemer here, looking to redeem for 2019. Located in Ontario, Canada. My situation is that my employer takes all of the deductions off and uses direct deposit to my chequing account. The chequing account was not opened with any lawful money verbiage on the documents. I have access to all of my stubs through an online portal where I can print them off and stamp them providing proof of lawful money redemption. I'm going to order a stamp with the verbiage below..
"Special deposit for credit on account
to be redeemed in lawful money without recourse
Bills of Exchange Act, RSC 1985, c B-4, s 67(1) my signature here"
Does this contain all the required verbiage? I have referenced the acts below. Should I write Special deposit or will Deposit be fine?
Within my understanding the right to restrict my endorsement of my paycheck, and redeem lawful money (money without private interest owing) from my employer in exchange for my labour, should be the same as the U.S. version USCA12 section 411?
See a bit of history of the Canadian banking system here. One by the Bank of Canada..:
Will I need any other type of supplemental evidence of lawful money redemption besides my pay stubs with the verbiage stamped on the back and signed by me?
Something seems contradictory about Special Deposit followed by - for credit on account. I am not sure the bank can distinguish between owing you the bills in the vault and private credit from the Crown; central banking debt notes.
P.S. Thank you BTW; Your post and research are taking me through a productive mental journey transposing into Canadian Crown Templar history.
Report Excerpt for the National Monetary Commission
Found an interesting article that references the Canadian monetary system pg. (62) and lawful money as Dominion notes or gold on pg. (65). Could this be used as a reference to the difference between lawful money (dominion notes or gold) as opposed to private credit (bank notes) when articulating the redemption verbiage. Specifically if you reference back to pg. (63) second paragraph.
Found an interesting article that references the Canadian monetary system pg. (62) and lawful money as Dominion notes or gold on pg. (65). Could this be used as a reference to the difference between lawful money (dominion notes or gold) as opposed to private credit (bank notes) when articulating the redemption verbiage. Specifically if you reference back to pg. (63) second paragraph.
What if, the Canadians posting here aren't Canadians? Seems to me the last thing an agent will do is help anyone escape central banking.
I think the CRA has 99% of the population wrapped up in the central banking system.. haha I wouldn't think they care to send agents to online forums when everyone is already subscribing to the system.
I think the CRA has 99% of the population wrapped up in the central banking system.. haha I wouldn't think they care to send agents to online forums when everyone is already subscribing to the system.
Hi Jroc; In light of BRUNO, I have seen them lie about tailing a suitor to make it seem a coincidence that a drug investigator just happened along at the moment. This brought out the equivalent "Interstate Commerce Clause" involving the Crown in jurisdiction. Even though I was helping the Canadian suitors through traffic cases.
Canadian Taxpayers are they a Itemized group french italian irish chinese i wonder if chinese canadians can chose english or french agents or does the crown agency have a chinese representative. What is a employer holding back if its not a canadian tax and if your redemption isn't in canadian currency or bills then why the two serial #ers on the bill must be two sets of books. No agent would every help explain whats canadian signature and endorsement.If any asiatic tax payers yen for the redemption of canadian money drop the canadian part of your inheritage. I haven't seen a posting canadians since the quatloos posing / equivalents of one. good point lorne hows a crown agent got any authority over me.
Yes. I have not studied through the fidelity bonding in Canada so BRUNO is enforcement, to abate a nuisance. The nuisance is whenever the Crown refuses to acknowledge the right to restrict endorsement according to the Bank Act.
Canadian Taxpayers are they a Itemized group french italian irish chinese i wonder if chinese canadians can chose english or french agents or does the crown agency have a chinese representative. What is a employer holding back if its not a canadian tax and if your redemption isn't in canadian currency or bills then why the two serial #ers on the bill must be two sets of books. No agent would every help explain whats canadian signature and endorsement.If any asiatic tax payers yen for the redemption of canadian money drop the canadian part of your inheritage. I haven't seen a posting canadians since the quatloos posing / equivalents of one. good point lorne hows a crown agent got any authority over me.
My xPartranslator is kicking in again. This jumped out at me...
What is a employer holding back if its not a canadian tax and if your redemption isn't in canadian currency or bills then why the two serial #ers on the bill must be two sets of books.
Withholdings! We have another Canadian poised on the Lesson Plan. Thanks xParte!
One of your Greatest hits walter That transcript has know yankee/ american cousins its a private canadian document made public thanks to you wall eh
I have found another one which is probably just as good by accident. I am guessing it is just as good because I have never read it but how I found it makes me think its another sledge hammer. Maybe someone here can help me try to find it.
REGINA vs ANTHONY BLAIR
I was doing a google search on BRUNO and found this page. Its from a book called
" Law and the Built Environment "
By Douglas Wood
In it the author uses BRUNO as an example to describe simple court procedure which I found very strange knowing that the case is such a sludge hammer. And as you can see he also uses ANTHONY BLAIR. So lets get our hands on BLAIR.
Comment