IRS forms a Lien against the American Taxpayer for $14.3T

[allodial]

The timing is quite interesting.

[allodial]

Perhaps this clarifies the conversation that you had.

"The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." United States Supreme Court, 1968, Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 349

The above quote actually refines to:

"The ability to place a lien upon a man's property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." 37 Wis. 2d, at 171, 154 N. W. 2d, at 264.

Likely the word 'man' means vassal in that context. They are likely presuming the filing to constitute public notice. Recently have revised the UCC system in places to allow for a DEBTOR to strike the record (ala UCC5 (Maryland)). Perhaps compare UCC3 (Amendment/Assignment/Continuation/Termination to Financing Statement) to UCC5 (Correction Statement). Interesting that UCC3 wouldn't be enough.

[David Merrill]

Perhaps this clarifies the conversation that you had.

"The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." United States Supreme Court, 1968, Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 349

The above quote actually refines to:

"The ability to place a lien upon a man's property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." 37 Wis. 2d, at 171, 154 N. W. 2d, at 264.

Likely the word 'man' means vassal in that context. They are likely presuming the filing to constitute public notice. Recently have revised the UCC system in places to allow for a DEBTOR to strike the record (ala UCC5 (Maryland)). Perhaps compare UCC3 (Amendment/Assignment/Continuation/Termination to Financing Statement) to UCC5 (Correction Statement). Interesting that UCC3 wouldn't be enough.

We are on the same page you and I. I will add some details for the Readers' sake.

It might be a bit reckless to dismiss the form arises from the David Wynn MILLER camp because of the timing. I accept the Lien on the [IRS] to be a valid claim even with the funny 1789 Treasury jargon mostly for the term revenue hyphenated re-venue. The claim stands upon the waters of the world (admiralty/NAWAPA) while the human population is naturally land-locked and air-breathing.

[BTW - The United Nations campus in America (Manhattan) was declared International Soil by a very rich man named David ROCKEFELLER. The political clout to give 18 acres of America away to the world is mammon. Ergo the 14:00 and 20:00 Minute Marks are noteworthy. Dr. Dale LIVINGSTON, Esquire (Crown) presents it like his NLP has had a stroke but the point is well researched I am sure. So not to lose you all, this will tie easily to an informal Masonic annointing to VAN PELT soon. Genome has stricter boundaries than ignorance [last signature].]

In other words Teunis Jansen Laenan VAN PELT had/has an estate on Manhattan Island where he built a large stone wall - Wall Street. Peaceable Reentry is primarily upon the Market. The Market was shut down for three days. Since this Notice of Claim arrived Monday before 1:00 pm EST and is still not on the docket report with PACER, I gather that www.savingtosuitorsclub.net and cyberspace in general will suffice. The original BoE doc was the one Tad sent to the NYSE. Ignoring a Notice while I have Delivery Confirmation is proof of service.

Allodial and I are on the Same Page in that Paul invented the Roman Welfare State and under a correct reading - out of his obstinance and cowardly nature. Reading the Book of Acts under an American pastor's guidance you will completely miss how the Holy Spirit kept warning Paul to stay out of Jerusalem (with his new Roman citizenship papers). Paul bravely went in anyway, having held jackets while people stoned Jesus' disciples basically, I deserve to die God, so I will be ignoring your warnings! I cannot say I blame him for having an instinct to survive but what happened next happened. Paul ran to Felix, the Roman marshal who jailed him in protective custody for two years and then remanded him to Rome for three more. To start connecting this flurry of dots though; try figuring why this poem is found on Page 8 of this 1928 Century Magazine Article.

Then of course you could always read the Book of Acts followed by the Book of Romans. Paul was convicted by the Sanhedrin of high treason against the Jews - and he lied about buying expensive citizenship papers in Cyprus. But more importantly, one Mnason (thinly encrypted) a Cypriot Jew lied about it so Paul bought probation (shaved head) long enough to make his escape from Jerusalem to go invent the Roman Welfare State - long since protected by his Romans 13 Doctrine.

My recent claim is upon the original 1639 Charter. Since my ancestry has preserved my perpetual inheritance unencumbered by the trappings of British fealty, I doubt there is much room for interpretation for the term perpetual.

However, author Harold D. Eberlein states: "there never was a duly and legally constituted Van Pelt Manor and this appellation has no defense whatever on any historic grounds.

The Masonic encryption is found in this Post by listening to Crown Testimony of Dr Dale, ESQUIRE above with this NY anointing, c. 1789 in mind.

Washington rode over the old highway in 1790, and was greeted in New Utrecht by the village people. There was great excitement when word came that the general was shortly to arrive. From the little school-house near VAN PELT Manor the school-chi1dren were hustled home for fresh linen and face-washings and hair-combings; and they were as quickly marched back, dressed in new clothes and company manners, for the great George Washington would pass their way. At last, after many anxious scannings of the road, they saw him riding toward the little school-house, and the children lined up and waited until he approached. Litte Peter VAN PELT was on the end of the line, and he was the last boy to whom George Washington spoke; and to little Peter he looked very tall, as he came near to him and laid his hand on Peter's head.

"Be a good boy, my son," said Washington, "and you will be a good man."

Little Peter VAN PELT probably remembered this admonition

This is how I see it anyway. You may interpret it differently.



Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S. The scope of the above post renders it moot in my opinion whether you want to cite the uncopyrighted Gutenberg Bible in the Library of Congress @ incun.1454.b5 (see link) or resort to Letters Patent of the Crown - Epistle Dedicatory 1, Epistle Dedicatory 2.

[Michael Joseph]

the term PERPETUAL is interesting indeed.

Article I. The Stile of this Confederacy shall be "The United States of America."

look on any one-dollar note - there is that Stile - save, it is now CAPITALIZED - in Trust, perhaps?

[David Merrill]

Perhaps this clarifies the conversation that you had.



The above quote actually refines to:



Likely the word 'man' means vassal in that context. They are likely presuming the filing to constitute public notice. Recently have revised the UCC system in places to allow for a DEBTOR to strike the record (ala UCC5 (Maryland)). Perhaps compare UCC3 (Amendment/Assignment/Continuation/Termination to Financing Statement) to UCC5 (Correction Statement). Interesting that UCC3 wouldn't be enough.

the term PERPETUAL is interesting indeed.

Article I. The Stile of this Confederacy shall be "The United States of America."

look on any one-dollar note - there is that Stile - save, it is now CAPITALIZED - in Trust, perhaps?

Two different subjects?

The first is from the 1629 Charter.

The second if I may presume is from Dr Dale LIVINGSTON, Esquire's interpretation of the Journals of the Continental Congress. If he is correct, and I believe a doctor in the law may well be, then you may be correctly interpreting that the nation was never formed by quorum a proper body politic but is rather a trust formed by New Utrecht - named New York after the British Indies Trading Company came into presences in the 1680's?

[allodial]

Two different subjects?

The first is from the 1629 Charter.

The second if I may presume is from Dr Dale LIVINGSTON, Esquire's interpretation of the Journals of the Continental Congress. If he is correct, and I believe a doctor in the law may well be, then you may be correctly interpreting that the nation was never formed by quorum a proper body politic but is rather a trust formed by New Utrecht - named New York after the British Indies Trading Company came into presences in the 1680's?

So my seemingly-"out there"-allusion for all these years (or decades) of "UN" being 'oddly enough' an acronym for "United Netherlands" might have some merit? That State of New York failed to ratify a few key is perhaps quite telling.


City of New York.


Missouri.


France.



Seems Wikipedia is seeing the light.

[allodial]

Orange.

James, Duke of York:

He was the king of England, Ireland, and Scotland, and the son of Charles I. He escaped to the Continent in 1648 and returned to England at the Restoration in 1660. He became king on the death of his brother, Charles II, in 1685, but had a decreasing reputation due to his conversion to Catholicism. William of Orange and his wife, Mary, James's daughter, were invited to England by Whig and Tory leaders in 1688, and James was allowed to escape to France. He changed the Netherlands to New York and changed the name of the capital from Fort Orange to Albany.

[EZrhythm]

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

[EZrhythm]

This filing seems to be the original that was then amended; http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/2...icaearlier.pdf



*Edit - I had attached the wrong file.

[David Merrill]

This filing seems to be the original that was then amended; http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/2...icaearlier.pdf

And now it seems to have been amended again. (attached)

There is a name on the first amendment; Carmen Milagros Ortiz, she was sworn in last year as U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts;
http://www.boston.com/news/local/mas...y_is_sworn_in/

Amazing post Allodial!

You mean a more recent amendment since August 12th? I don't find an attachment. I think that's it. I am not finding Carmen's name on the links so far.

[allodial]

[stoneFree]

the filing gets a mention by George Ure this week:

A Troubling - or Inspired - UCC Filing

[motla68]

How is it that a traffic case and some ones notice to run for congress apply to this thread?

Other then that, just like any other corporation they will change their images to entice you into buying their crap!

"" • If an agent signs on behalf of his or her principal without the authority to do so, the principal will not be liable on the instrument, whereas the agent will be. ""
- simple contract law, whomever reserves the right to revoke in a action obviously is the one with liability. BUT have we absconded that liability by our own actions thus become subject to liability?

First big clue here on that sigil on the wall: " The Inc. Village ".

[David Merrill]

Thank you Stonefree,

Somebody emailed me that link and you beat me to posting it.

Thank you Allodial,

I get it. United Netherlands. Way back when; Tuesday Law Club Meetings Bruce lectured about how it is all Dutch East Indies Trading Company in proprietorship. I have seen bits and snippets that fit nicely into the puzzle. Having the Journals handy I suppose I should get down to the federal repository and verify that lecture from LIVINGSTON.

[Chex]

Acknowledgements for File Number: 0000000181425776 (History) Update