Enforcing R4C

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • EZrhythm
    replied
    Originally posted by bigred View Post
    Attached is the Declaration of Fraud letter that I have used for 3rd party collectors. I have never had one contact me again after receiving this letter.
    BigRed- Could you post that again? Would be very much appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • EZrhythm
    replied
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    Thanks!

    That is why I was having difficulty. Examples are not about enforcement. I suppose the judge might ignore it. In common law the county court judges can practice from the bench.

    Most county court judges will not docket the cause if it is R4C and in a proper evidence repository.
    I have experienced an attempt to ignore it by having the clerk quietly slide a false complaint in my direction. So then I ignored the complaint. The misd. was dropped to a $25 administration fee and I walked out. Before walking out the "commissioner" held up the NOTICE TO APPEAR that I had "R4C" and asked, "Do you remember this?"
    I only said, "Yes." We had a staring contest for a moment while his facial expression seemed to try and provoke me.

    I noticed how he brought the R4C up after the matter was settled and didn't offer any oral statements for the galley to decipher.

    So ultimately for select matters the only "enforcement" effort needed is to stand on one's refusal.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by Moxie View Post
    Another question:

    Is it true that a court judgement can be R4C'd? Just wondering if anyone has heard of that being done when a case has already been decided.

    You can process anything Refused for Cause. Just as there is no law against making a demand.

    How the universe around you responds to your demands and refusals is dependent on your understanding of law.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Merrill_FibbSpiral.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	56.6 KB
ID:	40762


    I was referring the set of laws that the Golden Mean as a mathematical model represents in terms of regeneration through ratios and equivalents, that form a growth process of an entity or paradigm (mind) that evolves it thru time as a moment-by-moment transformation brought about thru an energetic exchange of influences that modify the mind as an absorption, integration and equilibrating process that forms an endless array of variables as a result. Dreams, as states-of-mind on different planes of consciousness, all of which contain corresponding realities as a form of theme, operate according to the same set of laws! That's why law is considered absolute truth; it operates in a consistent manner on all levels of existence, not just the physical.

    Text message from Dr. Linda Darlene GADBOIS
    This is why suitors in brain trust develop evidence repositories. We utilize the US clerk of court and PACER for notice of our process.

    In other words if your refusal is more competent than the judgment you Refuse for Cause then you will see that result according to the 'saving to suitors' clause of 1789. You will realize and demonstrate your common law remedy.


    The Lesson Plan is simply:

    1) true identity
    2) record forming
    3) redeem lawful money
    Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 09-11-13, 11:41 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moxie
    replied
    Another question:

    Is it true that a court judgement can be R4C'd? Just wondering if anyone has heard of that being done when a case has already been decided.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnnyCash
    Guest replied
    Oh! that's it, I was misspelling it. Fascinating; thanks for that. I see there's a good reason Bobbinville is now deserted - it was buried underwater to provide the METROpolitan Water Basin known as the Quabbin Reservoir. You may be more effected by METRO than the rest of us.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobbinville
    Guest replied
    No, Bobbinville is the nickname for a former village in Massachusetts which once had a factory which made wooden bobbins for the local textile mills. A sawmill just across the river supplied the raw material for the bobbins. The factory flourished until after the Civil War, when small, water-powered mills became inefficient and uneconomical. The one in Bobbinville closed over 100 years ago; and in fact Bobbinville is completely deserted today. A branch of my family lived somewhat to the east; but I chose it as my handle here because I simply liked the name.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnnyCash
    Guest replied
    Oh there you are. Most agents of disinfo went silent for a few days there and I wasn't sure if you were writing a new article or ... well nevermind that.

    I searched for Bobbinsville and found no such village but I did find a Robbinsville, North Carolina. Is that where you're from? I understand the term "---ville" denotes a village. And the term village derives from "vill" - a cluster of tenant farmer houses from way back when. A status just above serfs, these tenant farmers were required to stay on the lord's manor to which they were attached by birth. The tenant was also called a villein, tilling farmland assigned them on shares while still making payments to the manor lord.

    Fast forwarding now, who are today's serfs & villeins? Wouldn't it be fair to say those toiling in the system of central banking unaware of the alternative? As we've learned here, simply by not endorsing private credit of the Fed, we commoners owe no tax, we legally owe no homage to the manor lord. Now the spread of this new knowledge would be quite upsetting to the manor lord, no? Seems natural to me he would send out village agents to disrupt the dissemination of that new knowledge, make it sound like it wasn't even true.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobbinville
    Guest replied
    Please redact page 2 of your sample letter. There is a name appearing in the acknowledgment clause.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigred
    replied
    Declaration of Fraud

    Attached is the Declaration of Fraud letter that I have used for 3rd party collectors. I have never had one contact me again after receiving this letter.



    BigRed;

    You can edit in a redacted attachment at your convenience.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 07-20-13, 01:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BAMAJiPS
    replied
    Well, I've been contacted numerous times on this debt after clear proof of certified mail of my R4C and cease and desist letter. I am going to compose an invoice and write a cover letter stating that they need to compensate me ala "The Spaniard". I hope I dont make a fool of myself, but, nothing ventured - nothing gained. I suppose I can demand they pay or I'll take them to court and the Spaniard says that once you file, they always magically seem to pay if you have sent notice to them three times.
    Thoughts?

    Leave a comment:


  • John Howard
    replied
    I already need glasses.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    Good call John! You might have gone blind.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Howard
    replied
    Times are tough.

    No, I did not order your magazine.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • ManOntheLand
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by BAMAJiPS View Post
    - so do I send a letter to the agency saying they have violated the UCC/FDCPA or just wait to see IF I get sued and present my R4C in court etc or even let them get a summary judgement and then attack the summary judgement later?
    A letter to let them know that you know they have violated FDCPA is a good start. FDCPA is much more specific and simpler to enforce than UCC provisions in this situation. The penalty on them under FDCPA is mandatory by law if you sue and provide the proof they committed the violation of FDCPA. So you could go on the offense and sue them. If all you want is for them to go away, a credible threat to sue in a letter might do it.

    As far as defending against their lawsuit: check your state statutes and case law, rules of civil procedure, and rules of court. They may be deprived of standing in court to sue you if they have violated FDCPA. You could move to dismiss with that as your basis--"plaintiff has no standing to sue". This is in accordance with the "clean hands" doctrine of equity courts. I would not answer a complaint from them (filing a motion to dismiss is not an answer), nor would I allow a summary judgment and then try to undo it. Take the bull by the horns. If they broke the rules, you should be able to get them to back off.

    Leave a comment:


  • walter
    replied
    The "spaniard from the white rabbit group" has a wonderful method of suing company's that break the rules.
    He wins all the time. Google him and check out his collection methods.

    Enforcing this R4C could be as easy as using the privacy act on them.

    Unauthorized use of the NAME is a tort.
    If they can't show consent was granted then I don't have to prove a thing.

    Attach a fee schedule for unauthorized use of the NAME.
    If they want to do business with me then they need to apply for an account number so I can bill them.

    Leave a comment:

Working...