Quashing the Russian Indictment

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • walter
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 662

    #46
    Originally posted by David Merrill View Post
    It makes me think that his business dealings with Russia and accomplishments in the Ukraine were meant to become public as counterintelligence.
    Political theater at its finest.

    Comment

    • David Merrill
      Administrator
      • Mar 2011
      • 5949

      #47
      Some comical moments in the thread at the beginning...

      I heard Dabney L. as Daniel and had her oath all along. So I showed the chief judge oath instead on the Amicus Curiae brief. Also I plugged a 13 instead of 18 into the search engine and found SEALED v SEALED to mean a conspiracy - as my Amicus brief was served on the clerk of court.

      No mistakes - no accidents. If I had ended the melodrama that fast, then the Hunter debacle would probably have missed my attention altogether.

      I might spend some time reading through this thread and so digest exactly what is happening with my real time geopolitical social engineering platform; and how this Saving to Suitors' consulate works in embassy. Clubs and Associations are high on the political home rule municipal jurisdiction court of record authority. We have known that for a long time. Real people in Russia register here all day long. I can see when they sleep and when they are up working. I see them using TOR browsers...

      What was GUILLIANI doing? Why make such a fuss over Hunter's promises to Russia? And his commitments to projects underway in the Ukraine?

      Combined with dropping off, and then leaving his disk for recovery until it was abandoned tells me we have two Russian puppets under one Russian puppeteer.
      www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
      www.bishopcastle.us
      www.bishopcastle.mobi

      Comment

      • David Merrill
        Administrator
        • Mar 2011
        • 5949

        #48
        Originally posted by Christopher Thomas View Post
        https://twitter.com/RepArmstrongND/s...75118932545536

        This is interesting.. Representative ARMSTRONG speaks of "Federal Recusal". I'm guessing within this tornado of confusion behind MUELLER and this collusion mumbo...
        I don't pay to much attention to all this "drama"
        but am I wrong about this...? if, presidential candidates try to influence American's to vote for them and "President's" deal with other foreign powers than why wouldn't other foreign powers want to or not do business with a certain presidential candidate? surely, business with other countries will have positive or negative effects on this nation so...What I am basically asking is.., What is the problem? I mean TRUMP was saying things about U.K. Prime minister before he was a prime minister so TRUMP tried to interfere? I don't see the issue.
        Does not the same go for the Puppeteer?

        [The geopolitical social engineer?]


        Originally posted by lorne View Post


        And did you see the indictment accuses Concord of paying a troll farm $1.2 million a month for fake personas, false Twitter accounts, Faceberg ads, etc.
        https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...-top-courtroo/

        Question is, how much are they spending on STSC ?

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]5290[/ATTACH]
        This is how I quashed it after a few years, anyway. I emailed the Amicus brief with Dabney's oath to several attorneys at Reed Smith.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	Email to REEDSMITH Defense Attorneys What I Would Do on 3 2 20.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	229.2 KB
ID:	44997

        See how her oath changes "So help me God." to "SO HELP ME GOD"?

        Click image for larger version

Name:	Oath Dabney (3).jpg
Views:	4
Size:	124.6 KB
ID:	44998
        Last edited by David Merrill; 01-01-21, 12:19 AM.
        www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
        www.bishopcastle.us
        www.bishopcastle.mobi

        Comment

        Working...
        X