State Legislation nods to Original Thirteenth Amendment

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David Merrill
    Administrator
    • Mar 2011
    • 5954

    #1

    State Legislation nods to Original Thirteenth Amendment

    This is an attachment to every Libel of Review:



    Click Here.

    HB 638 - AS INTRODUCED
    2013 SESSION
    13-0796
    09/01




    HOUSE BILL 638



    AN ACT recognizing the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United
    States Constitution.

    SPONSORS: Rep. Tremblay, Rock 4; Rep. Baldasaro, Rock 5; Rep.
    Christiansen, Hills 37

    COMMITTEE: State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs

    ANALYSIS


    This bill recognizes the original Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

    1 Preamble and Statement of Intent. The general court hereby finds that:

    I. In 1810, a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibited titles of nobility and which later became known as the original Thirteenth Amendment, was introduced, passed both houses of Congress, and was sent to the states for ratification. On December 9, 1812, shortly after ratification by Virginia, New Hampshire became the
    thirteenth state to ratify the amendment. The amendment was therefore ratified by the requisite number of states and became Article XIII of the United States Constitution.

    II. During the War Between the States, otherwise known as the Civil War, the country was under martial law, and all executive orders made by President Lincoln were, in effect, law. After the war, laws made during that period were to be abated; yet, vestiges of martial law remained and presidents continued to write executive orders.

    III. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, otherwise known as the Act of 1871, created a corporation in the District of Columbia called the United States of America. The act revoked prior legislation relative to the district's municipal charter and, most egregiously, led to adoption of a fraudulent constitution in which the original Thirteenth Amendment was omitted.

    IV. Today, what appears to the public as the United States Constitution is not the complete document, as it was never lawfully amended to remove the Thirteenth Amendment. Instead, the document presented as the United States Constitution is merely a mission statement for the corporation unlawfully established in the Act of 1871.

    GO TO THE LINK TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL:

    [link to legiscan.com]
    That is interesting in itself considering territorial claim and survey; with both my family trees (Mom and Dad) being of Patroons. When heritage and destiny are in accord there is peace. I am finding it more revelation the role of the Masons being custodians of the Record. Synchronicity is the conscious memory that everything is happening at once, time being an illusion.

    This author, not being a suitor emailed me information without realizing how much of it is already integrated into the Libel of Review - Crosstalk:


    Continued...
    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
    www.bishopcastle.us
    www.bishopcastle.mobi
  • David Merrill
    Administrator
    • Mar 2011
    • 5954

    #2
    Key paragraph!





    Not quite;

    I have been telling you all for some time about the not-quite-territory Colorado. The '59'ers' claims were integrated into BUCHANNAN's war chest just prior to Mason LINCOLN carrying this Masonic Scepter to the inaugural altar in early 1861. Colorado allegedly became a Territory on February 28, 1861 and Congress adjourned sine die less than 30 days later, before the Act had a chance to cure in law.

    While on the surface this would seem to have no effect there is a fundamental fatal error in the math we understand as law. Another link, or dot to understand this is how the clerk and recorder indexes the Original Thirteenth Amendment. - And how it is so popular that the clerks keep it hanging for easy reference.



    Regards,

    David Merrill.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 03-30-13, 01:54 PM.
    www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
    www.bishopcastle.us
    www.bishopcastle.mobi

    Comment

    • allodial
      Senior Member
      • May 2011
      • 2866

      #3
      Very interesting. Re: the Old Union v. New Union pdf... has some truth to it but the pre-Civil War States weren't 'destroyed'. AFAIK U.S. System is similar to German System (multi-class citizenship...even Hitler exposed the dual/multi-citizenship system in Germany in his own way vis-a-vis Mein Kampf). To say that the pre-civil-war states to have been destroyed strikes me as errrant from experience. There might more merit with a distinction between post-Civil War States and pre-Civil-War States (around 33 in number). Direct experience has shown that the existence of more than one kind of 'state' in connection with the US/USA system is still a functional part of the laws thereof.
      All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

      "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
      "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
      Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

      Comment

      • Treefarmer
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2011
        • 473

        #4
        HB 638 still appears here (gencourt dot state dot nh dot us) for the 2013 session.
        I wonder if this means that the New Hampshire legislature is still deliberating on it?
        Treefarmer

        There is power in the blood of Jesus

        Comment

        • David Merrill
          Administrator
          • Mar 2011
          • 5954

          #5
          Thanks for the update Treefarmer!
          www.lawfulmoneytrust.com
          www.bishopcastle.us
          www.bishopcastle.mobi

          Comment

          Working...
          X