Tweet
I believe you are right. Title and Claim.
-
David Wilcock claims to have received death threats and has recorded a Part II interview last night with Kerry Cassidy.
Go here: http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/...amelot_11.html
and grab the 12/14/11 mp3 file.Comment
-
Jeremiah 32 supports your post.
See Jer 32:8
Jeremiah 32:8 NAS
"Then Hanamel my uncle's son came to me in the court of the guard according to the word of the LORD and said to me, 'Buy my field, please, that is at Anathoth, which is in the land of Benjamin ; for you have the right of possession and the redemption is yours; buy it for yourself.' Then I knew that this was the word of the LORD.
Notice "the right of possession" phrase. In Strong's Concordance, possession is #3425 is another form of 3424 meaning "possession, occupancy, inheritance", and comes from 3423 meaning "It has a legal sense of becoming an heir (Jer 23:8)"
IMHO, the claiming of our inheritance should become a priority for us now. Perhaps start with our birth-right (birth certificate)?Comment
-
-
another perspective:
"David Wilcock Breaks Down About Gold in the Woo-Woo
A handful of subscribers have asked me to comment on the latest breakdown in the conspiracy world. A well known "conspiracy guru" named David Wilcock had a very emotion breakdown that was recorded on Project Camelot Radio. Apparently he had his life threatened by the "Bad Guys" because he was exposing the $1T lawsuit that will save us all from the Bad Guys and the BIG secret that there's millions of tons of gold in the world. Here's the interview if you are up for a little high drama.
Before I give you my take on it our friend Clif High gave a very good summery of what he thinks is going on...
Yet More Critical Thinking...
I'm on the Clif High page with his analysis of Wilcock but I'd like to take it a touch further. When it comes to the secret gold and the lawsuit to take down the bad guys...this is not news in the gold circles. Just read the resources tab on the RoadtoRoota.com:
I also touched upon it years ago in this article:
Golden Secrets
The news about all the secret treaties has been around for decades as well and I believe many of them to be true also.
I understand how people like Wilcock can get excited about discovering that our financial system is not what it seems but he really should do more research before he starts running around town shouting that this lawsuit will free us from the clutches of the bad guys. Of course it won't. Even if it is won how much is a trillion dollars to the owners of a printing press or a computer? The Fed sneezes a Trillion before breakfast!
This lawsuit is "much ado about nothing".
As for the millions of tons of gold...some of it is real and some of it is tungsten. That's what is important. Also, all that gold is NOTHING compared to all the electronic financial assets in the world in the many quintillions. Gold will continue to rise in fiat money terms and at some point gold coin will begin to circulate again as money.
What Wilcock should be watching is the implosion of the derivative markets as THAT is the ONLY thing that will take the banksters out and set the financial world straight.
The total and complete destruction of all electronic and paper assets and debt will be achieved when a single large bank such as JP Morgan implodes. Then he should get all worked up!
As for the guy that came on the phone named "anonymous"...how cool is an Irish spaceman coming to the aid of us little humans struggling with our monetary system?!!!
It's gonna get a lot stranger down the Road to Roota!
Have a nice weekend.
Bix" 12/16/11Comment
-
this report is interesting: http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/2012...ns-have-begun/
Particularly that secret government page talking about a "Chinese Red Dragon Family."Comment
-
-
The Neil Keenan case resurfaces in this 5/2/12 Kerry Cassidy interview with Keith Scott. He talks about OITC, Ray C. DAM, gold, and points out what some of us now know; the mortgage borrower promises to pay back part of the national debt:
(fastforward 9 minutes)
You may also find this 5/3 Drake call interesting:
(fastforward 5 minutes)
EDIT: now listening to this 4/22 episode of "End The Lie" radio interviewing Keith Scott and Winston Shrout
Winston at min 49: "... people constantly ask me, if I were going to study commerce what would be the best book for me to study? And believe it or not I point them right straight to the King James version of the Holy Bible .."
Goes on to say he learned the commercial lien technology from Hartford Van Dyke.Last edited by Guest; 05-05-12, 08:25 PM.Comment
-
I now see that David Wilcock interviewed Winston Shrout here, I'm guessing on or about May 1st:
It's about 2 hours in two mp3 files: http://divinecosmos.com/winston2012.zipComment
-
KEENAN has apparently withdrawn the case and plans to refile.
When I compile all the information I need in which I can kick the financial system in the ass and straighten it out then I will file. My main concern is Jurisdiction which is what the Judge also made mention of and clearly stated that he would throw the case out if we did not prove we have it. In order to do this I am going to expose the illegal banking system. Let them then tell me when the Federal Reserve Bank of NY is shown to be part and parcel to the theft. I will have the information to prove this.Comment
-
Originally posted by stoneFree View Post
Please remind me in September and I might get that Transcript for an interesting read!Attached FilesComment
-
-
Drake has released an interesting 22-page PDF file today, purportedly from Neil KEENAN. Go here:
Last edited by Guest; 09-24-12, 12:49 AM.Comment
-
Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/14/2012.
I have not read this 28-page transcript myself yet, so it is up for discussion here. I suspect we might find in this transcript the reason why KEENAN dropped his case.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. This is interesting!
MR. MULLIGAN: Well, maybe not in the complaint, your Honor, but in our research I do believe that what we have here is the expropriation of United States Federal Reserve notes. If you go on the Federal Reserve -- and I do believe it's uniquely federal interest in that they are notes issued by the federal government -- withdrawn, not the federal government, the Federal Reserve, which is not part of the government. And I think that given that there are perhaps $134.5 billion worth of Federal Reserve notes floating around that have been stolen, that would be subject to the auspices of the Federal Reserve Bank in New York, that this Court, because there are uniquely federal interests involved in the possible black marketing, if you will, of United States Federal Reserve notes, that a federal court, and certainly in New York where the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is located, would have jurisdiction...
Judge: "Cash, I have a $20 bill here, it says at the top "Federal Reserve note." It would be hard to imagine that a federal court would have subject matter jurisdiction in a case involving the theft of a large amount of cash, or cash regardless of how much of it was involved. So you can address it."
P.P.S. Page 12/28 on the .pdf reader:
That US Corporation is USA Inc. I believe. There may be a US Inc. in Maryland but that would have equally well articles of incorporation like USA Inc. which is a sporting events company.Cash, I have a $20 bill here, it says at the top "Federal Reserve note." It would be hard to imagine that a federal court would have subject matter jurisdiction in a case involving the theft of a large amount of cash, or cash regardless of how much of it was involved. So you can address it.
Last edited by David Merrill; 09-23-12, 01:56 AM.Comment
-
This keeps getting better! A-China-Ca!
And I have just -- I'm just interested in all these -- if you're going to get involved in something as complicated as this, then because the Chinese have just been given a position with the Federal Reserve, now not only are they using the sinking fund in Switzerland, they're now coming in and using it here in New York by becoming, as the Hong Kong Shanghai Bank was brought in, the red Chinese bank is coming in to run our banking system, and I think these matters should be put before the Court.Comment
-
If it takes the Chinese to get the criminals out of our banking system I'm all for it. What stands out to me ... is plaintiff didn't serve any of the 14 defendants, .. because they couldn't find Dal Bosco? And the court didn't bat an eye when Mulligan said Federal Reserve wasn't part of the US government, and that the US was a Maryland corporation. What is a sinking fund? And what's up with that intervenor?
Judge seemed doubtful that court had subject matter jurisdiction. It almost seemed like a test on plaintiff's part to see how a case like this might play out.
I've heard KEENAN is in the far East, feels Keith SCOTT is untrustworthy, and plans to re-file. His communications to Drake and Jean Haines are sometimes posted.Last edited by Guest; 09-24-12, 02:51 AM.Comment
Comment