I Must Take a Closer Look at This

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • David Merrill
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    Exactly.

    Survey First
    Claim Second
    Once Claim is established in the cognizance of all nation states then
    Grant Property Rights to Lords, Earls, Barons, etc [those clothed with Royalty]
    Estates are carved out of Property.

    Thusly Land is property but Residential, Commercial, Agricultural, Religious, etc. are estates.

    Those who hold property rights historically could collect Quit Rents. The Estates and their uses were created and let out to Tenants called Terre-Tenants. The terre-tenants [grantee] are trustees subject to the bylaws which govern the use. For the consideration of the transfer of the estate the trustee pays a FEE. The terre-tenant does not have true Ownership and Dominion over property but only over the Estate subject to the bylaws that govern the uses. The terre-tenant is allowed to buy/sell the Estates and to take profits, rents and avails to his own but the property remains vested in those who hold the property rights.

    When you begin to see this as a mathematical formula, then you can easily see if the State has been mortgaged then other districts form whereof uses and rents are established within those Collection Districts = Hell = Debt. Dis-trictus. The Claim is upon the THING and said claim is in regard to who has the right to use.

    The actual name matters not - in the end those Property Rights are going nowhere unless the Heads of State decide to alienate said Property Rights. Good stuff walter - you are right on target!

    Trump is talking about bringing money back to America. And many of the masses are backing this plan but then again these have no idea of the ESF and its purpose. If they did they would realize how ignorant is such a plan. In order for the global population to accept a one-world government there must be a one-world catastrophe - money bubble explodes! Yep, that would do it!

    Have you read Genesis 47 lately? Maybe you should. For it foretells the end from the beginning. An inversion "V"

    On the "Carolinas" originally 8 shares were issued in this PROPRIETORSHIP - the Crown held 6 shares and Earl Granville and Earl Carteret held the other shares. These Earls were vested with property rights and granted the ability to administrate government. Later all 8 shares were returned to the Crown. And Corporations such as THE VIRGINIA COMPANY and THE DUTCH EAST/WEST INDIES COMPANY - were vested with property rights of the Crown. The latter corporations fly the Red, White and Blue colours of the Crown. So what is new under the sun? Nothing.

    Best Regards,
    MJ


    Thank you for bumping that. One item I interject into your question about God's plan is that I would reconsider the "Crown" the Crown Templar Society from the City of London in the post, rather than the Crown of England.



    I should explain that the Canadian government asked the author to please take the article down. But it was too late and the article was circulating widely, but almost always with some editing - even malicious intentions and agenda permutation. So this is the original article here.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	middle temple.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	42.6 KB
ID:	42262
    Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 04-26-16, 03:41 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tim
    replied
    Gods plan?

    What is Gods purpose in all of this?
    Where do we fit in who wish follow Gods plan?
    Are we just chaff in the wind subject to every whim of Government?
    Please give us some direction.
    Tim

    Originally posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    Exactly.

    Survey First
    Claim Second
    Once Claim is established in the cognizance of all nation states then
    Grant Property Rights to Lords, Earls, Barons, etc [those clothed with Royalty]
    Estates are carved out of Property.

    Thusly Land is property but Residential, Commercial, Agricultural, Religious, etc. are estates.

    Those who hold property rights historically could collect Quit Rents. The Estates and their uses were created and let out to Tenants called Terre-Tenants. The terre-tenants [grantee] are trustees subject to the bylaws which govern the use. For the consideration of the transfer of the estate the trustee pays a FEE. The terre-tenant does not have true Ownership and Dominion over property but only over the Estate subject to the bylaws that govern the uses. The terre-tenant is allowed to buy/sell the Estates and to take profits, rents and avails to his own but the property remains vested in those who hold the property rights.

    When you begin to see this as a mathematical formula, then you can easily see if the State has been mortgaged then other districts form whereof uses and rents are established within those Collection Districts = Hell = Debt. Dis-trictus. The Claim is upon the THING and said claim is in regard to who has the right to use.

    The actual name matters not - in the end those Property Rights are going nowhere unless the Heads of State decide to alienate said Property Rights. Good stuff walter - you are right on target!

    Trump is talking about bringing money back to America. And many of the masses are backing this plan but then again these have no idea of the ESF and its purpose. If they did they would realize how ignorant is such a plan. In order for the global population to accept a one-world government there must be a one-world catastrophe - money bubble explodes! Yep, that would do it!

    Have you read Genesis 47 lately? Maybe you should. For it foretells the end from the beginning. An inversion "V"

    On the "Carolinas" originally 8 shares were issued in this PROPRIETORSHIP - the Crown held 6 shares and Earl Granville and Earl Carteret held the other shares. These Earls were vested with property rights and granted the ability to administrate government. Later all 8 shares were returned to the Crown. And Corporations such as THE VIRGINIA COMPANY and THE DUTCH EAST/WEST INDIES COMPANY - were vested with property rights of the Crown. The latter corporations fly the Red, White and Blue colours of the Crown. So what is new under the sun? Nothing.

    Best Regards,
    MJ

    Leave a comment:


  • allodial
    replied
    If they can pass it on to you using equity (i.e. you paid it so you must owe it), they just might.

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael Joseph
    replied
    The Trustee [Legal Title holder] pays the property taxes UNLESS there is an agreement whereby the Borrower pays the property taxes as in most if not all Deeds of Trust.

    Leave a comment:


  • lorne
    replied
    This may be no solution for you but I recall the guy who got the bank to pay the property taxes.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	mortgagetx.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	174.8 KB
ID:	42240

    Leave a comment:


  • pumpkin
    replied
    So if they are the servant who is to blame you or them if you do nothing?

    That is certainly not the case. A court that will not give findings and conclusions or follow their own rules and precedents is simply lawless and unusable.

    Suitors control the courts.

    That is a myth. It maybe is supposed be that way, but I can tell you it is not. Have you been to court much?

    Your assertion, having to be upheld by vulgarity, is what caused me to stop and think though. It shows that you do not understand what you are talking about.

    Out of pure aggravation. My apologies. Please expand upon, 'it shows that you do not understand what you are talking about'.

    If your foe took over your kitchen,

    So much easier. That guy brought a knife to a gun fight.
    Last edited by pumpkin; 04-11-16, 12:46 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • David Merrill
    replied
    And those fuckers control the courts.

    Suitors control the courts.

    Your assertion, having to be upheld by vulgarity, is what caused me to stop and think though. It shows that you do not understand what you are talking about.

    ..., saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it...

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael Joseph
    replied
    Originally posted by allodial View Post
    What do you think it means to hold fast? What crown?
    The Scriptures declare an ORDER of Melchizedok = Priest King. Or King of Righteousness. A Vassal king in the King. Thusly the King is King of kings. But each king enters into the Order in Contract to God. Therein is Freedom and each mind can climb the Mountain. But when enlightenment comes high atop the Mountain - the king is sent back down to serve - even those who hate him - in Love.

    "..but the honour of kings is to search out a matter."

    A king is with Understanding such that his Will may be exercised. Thusly his Mind is whole and used - for She will not give maintenance to 1/2 a man.

    What's a Sweetheart like you doing in a dump like this? She is birthing and raising up the man-children [Minds]. Thusly king Lemuel sits at the feet of his Mother - Proverbs 31.

    Pro 31:1 The words of king Lemuel, the prophecy that his mother taught him.
    Pro 31:2 What, my son? and what, the son of my womb? and what, the son of my vows?
    Pro 31:3 Give not thy strength unto women, nor thy ways to that which destroyeth kings.

    Joh_3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born from the Spirit [born again by Divine Power], he cannot see the kingdom of God.

    The Mind must be washed in Truth - by our Mother - Holy Spirit.

    Joh 8:31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed;

    Joh 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

    Romans 2:29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

    Luk 17:20 And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:

    Luk 17:21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.


    Are you young king Lemuel? I hope so! Are you the man-child birthed by the Spirit?

    Rev 12:5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.

    Will you overcome and sit in the throne?

    Rev 3:21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.

    Is not Jesus, God? Is not that which is born of the Holy Spirit, God?

    Shalom and Blessings,
    MJ

    Leave a comment:


  • allodial
    replied
    Originally posted by xparte View Post
    Realtor and Dealership real estate real property taxes one has licence to collect or no sale the process is commercial is a private land sale without tax expropriation squatting of the grid or is sleeping in abandon house or abandon car taxable why is a home lost to taxes not destroyed so a taxpayer can purchase the land minus the house is a real estate or property a development in said tax .if i claim property use its as a taxation on use or ownership the house or a bike has no owners if tax isn't payed my musings are likewise taxable .
    Real property and personal property are handle differently. Possession of real property borders upon military law and pedis possessio. The resident who leaves his mansion on 1 acre while he or she travels to France for 4 months borrows the military authority of the People to keep it safe for his return. Personal property, different matter. Automobiles are personal property; movables though they can be 'attached' to real property. Everything is not commercial. To be honest, airline pilots and taxi drivers provide labor, they are not merchants in fact so its not quite commercial. The commercial aspect of their business might then only be in the banking or financial side of their affairs rather than in the provision of service. The old "Patriot" misconception of "everything is commerce" is highly errant and misconstrued.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	_1438807235.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	59.7 KB
ID:	42178

    If your foe took over your kitchen, you don't start hating kitchens and cooks do you? You'd simply set your kitchen in order, right?
    Last edited by allodial; 04-11-16, 02:27 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • xparte
    replied
    Realtor and Dealership real estate real property taxes one has licence to collect or no sale the process is commercial is a private land sale without tax expropriation squatting of the grid or is sleeping in abandon house or abandon car taxable why is a home lost to taxes not destroyed so a taxpayer can purchase the land minus the house is a real estate or property a development in said tax .if i claim property use its as a taxation on use or ownership the house or a bike has no owners if tax isn't payed my musings are likewise taxable .

    Leave a comment:


  • allodial
    replied
    Originally posted by pumpkin View Post
    Also, to reiterate, you admitted the clerk told you how to de-register the land, right? How does that make for a conspiracy? Your delay in coming around to reading the instruction manual is his or her fault how? Even if there might be fraud, maybe there was a point in your life where you weren't as competent or of sound mind as you might be now. Not being of sound mind is a contractual defense too. Becoming more competent is whose responsibility?

    As I have stated before, creating and keeping records is not any unreasonable task for a servant. The taxes that are collected and pay their salaries are all paid by the people, in reality there is no one else (fictions are fictions). So in effect they work for us, they owe all the duties imposed by trust law. So if they will ignore that, they will ignore any law. They are the faithless servant, the liar and thief. And those fuckers control the courts. Now that last part is important. Now if somehow, the rules of court and precedents go out the window when admiralty in invoked, then it would need to be addressed. There is something in the statutes about if the owner cannot be found, the person occupying is liable, but I need to look that over a bit more. The people should not have to dot all i's and cross all t's to retain their unalienable rights in order to keep them safe from their own creation.
    Power and prosperity goes to the snoozing? Umm no? Is that why most every country has so many armed soldiers and ships of war because holding on to valuable land is for the slothful? Being dilligent is just too much work, right? AFAIK, that isn't how it works when the Adversary is constantly trying to take what you have. On my ship, I know how things work just as well if not better than my crew, down the metallurgy of the hull and engines, sewing stitches in sails, the kind of glues and sealants used. So if they are the servant who is to blame you or them if you do nothing? Who has the scepter you or them? You afraid to wield it?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	2dea6c722f479461086835c512710255.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	59.8 KB
ID:	42177

    One can return to the Land of the Sleepy Plebe. Or, one can roll with the kings. What was that Benjamin Franklin said:

    A republic, if you can keep it.
    I come quickly: hold fast what thou hast, that no one take thy crown. Revelations 3:11
    What do you think it means to hold fast? What crown?

    Originally posted by walter View Post
    [ATTACH]3828[/ATTACH]

    Apparently Karl Lentz http://www.broadmind.org/
    uses this word "idiot" to discharge.
    Actually, that term might actually be suitable to describe the private man who isn't minding his inheritance at all.
    Last edited by allodial; 04-11-16, 12:50 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • walter
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IDIOT....jpg
Views:	1
Size:	175.7 KB
ID:	42176

    Apparently Karl Lentz http://www.broadmind.org/
    uses this word "idiot" to discharge.

    Leave a comment:


  • pumpkin
    replied
    Also, to reiterate, you admitted the clerk told you how to de-register the land, right? How does that make for a conspiracy? Your delay in coming around to reading the instruction manual is his or her fault how? Even if there might be fraud, maybe there was a point in your life where you weren't as competent or of sound mind as you might be now. Not being of sound mind is a contractual defense too. Becoming more competent is whose responsibility?

    As I have stated before, creating and keeping records is not any unreasonable task for a servant. The taxes that are collected and pay their salaries are all paid by the people, in reality there is no one else (fictions are fictions). So in effect they work for us, they owe all the duties imposed by trust law. So if they will ignore that, they will ignore any law. They are the faithless servant, the liar and thief. And those fuckers control the courts. Now that last part is important. Now if somehow, the rules of court and precedents go out the window when admiralty in invoked, then it would need to be addressed. There is something in the statutes about if the owner cannot be found, the person occupying is liable, but I need to look that over a bit more. The people should not have to dot all i's and cross all t's to retain their unalienable rights in order to keep them safe from their own creation.

    Leave a comment:


  • allodial
    replied
    Originally posted by pumpkin View Post
    What political status have you established concerning yourself or your person regarding the case? Have you ever studied a book on land law or the Torrens system?

    FRAUD. An intentional perversion of truth for
    the purpose of inducing another in reliance upon
    it to part with some valuable thing belonging to
    him or to surrender a legal right; a false representation
    of a matter of fact, whether by words or
    by conduct, by false or misleading allegations,
    or by concealment of that which should have been
    disclosed, which deceives and is intended to deceive
    another so that he shall act upon it to his
    legal injury.

    Black's 4th
    I've yet to locate a city or county without a library within reasonable travel distance. Most everyone I've come across has law dictionaries and statutes somehow accessible. Also, most every DMV in the US clearly indicates that driver licenses are for residents. The Internet has been widely available since at least 1995 (more publicly) though its been around since the 60s. Most high schools in the USA required reading the state and federal constitutions during the 80s and 90s.

    I'm not aiming to take sides here. The point is how much progress do you think someone will make pivoting on how powerless he or she is and how powerful everyone else is? Even if there was fraud and wrong done against you, what are you going to do about it? If you think everyone has power but you then what possibly CAN you do about it? If power is everywhere else but where you are then what can you possibly do? The problem IMHO with pointing the finger outward all of the time (not saying that you are or aren't) is that one doing the pointing might come find some serious problems concerning the distribution of power.

    Also, to reiterate, you admitted the clerk told you how to de-register the land, right? How does that make for a conspiracy? Your delay in coming around to reading the instruction manual is his or her fault how? Even if there might be fraud, maybe there was a point in your life where you weren't as competent or of sound mind as you might be now. Not being of sound mind is a contractual defense too. Becoming more competent is whose responsibility?



    Who doesn't realize that HERMAN YANG and YANG HERMAN aren't the same name? That "CA" and "California" aren't exactly the same. We're talking basic grammar and passing a written driver's license test is taken as evidence that you know how to read. There really is a balance to be found. But sitting on the fence can be perilous.
    Last edited by allodial; 04-10-16, 05:46 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • pumpkin
    replied
    What political status have you established concerning yourself or your person regarding the case? Have you ever studied a book on land law or the Torrens system?

    FRAUD. An intentional perversion of truth for
    the purpose of inducing another in reliance upon
    it to part with some valuable thing belonging to
    him or to surrender a legal right; a false representation
    of a matter of fact, whether by words or
    by conduct, by false or misleading allegations,
    or by concealment of that which should have been
    disclosed, which deceives and is intended to deceive
    another so that he shall act upon it to his
    legal injury.

    Black's 4th

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X