Explanation Letter and Admiralty Article

[shikamaru]

Considering the Federal Reserve dollar is on death watch, and this is Shmita year (SHEMITTAH - Sabbath year observed every 7 years in Judaism, in which the land isn't cultivated and debts are cancelled) I believe the BRICS Alliance will emerge with metal-backed currency this year.

"The Eastern nations, led by the BRICS Alliance, are planning quietly a new gold & silver backed currency. It will arrive on the back of the Gold Trade Note to be used as Letter of Credit, which is in the works. Gold is a monetary metal. It will survive the paper wealth implosion." - Jim Willie
http://news.goldseek.com/GoldenJackass/1427486400.php

Gold and silver backed currency is just a teaser to get people into the medium.
Seek to redeem the reserve currency and watch them hem and haw.

Once enough or many are using the currency, the reserve currency (gold and silver) will be pulled, if not all at once, slowly until there is nothing or some other medium has been substituted as reserve currency.

[Chex]

And no surprise, Federal judgments are paid out pretty much like tax refunds through FMS Treasury. The flip-side is, if they harm you they could become liable to pay as if it were a tax. Its a two-edged sword for them. If an assessment is made against them per a judgment, for them to argue is to argue tax matters and to question the public debt--that is probably why they were served a can of "Shut up and do your job, clerks."--risk management, actuaries, inn sewer ants, etc. Consider that the typical traffic court case is like "rate-limited" (think network traffic) by the fact that the 'judges' have to give a criminal burden of proof before they can collect on their assessment. THE WAY THEY HAVE TO HANDLE THE CASE IS THAT THEY MUST PROVE THAT THEY CAN JUSTIFY THE TAX!!!!! The requirement of giving an alleged breach of contract a criminal burden of proof is designed to STOP THEM MAKING FRIVOLOUS ASSESSMENTS!

If you collect tax as a federal judge, you can't kvetch about paying it without expecting some negative reverberations. David Merrill, also consider that the tax filing requirements are far more stringent for attorneys. Members of the bar appear to be REQUIRED to have an SSN or tax ID. So there is some "cross talk" and "metaphysical improvement in resolution" going on here in the sense that attorney at bar is always a taxpayer.

I suspect the IMF only comes into play when it comes to general payments to the U.S. Treasury. Consider the Secretary of Treasury to be like a transistor, gate or router. If the money is destined for overseas, he has to deal with IMF/BIS. Like you, I take hype with a grain or two of salt. The idea that the IRS is the IMF is a bit sketchy. That there is overlap--no doubt. I have a few texts on the UCC and one of them makes it clear that the UCC is a "State law". Consider however that the District of Columbia is in a sense a "State".

P.S. the masters behave too stupidly, drunken or indifferent to stop their servants from clowning around.

Collecting Federal Revenue: FMS administers the world's largest government funds collections systems through a network of more than 10,000 financial institutions. In fiscal year 2011 the bureau collected $3.06 trillion in federal revenues, such as individual and corporate income tax deposits, customs duties, fees for government services, fines, and loan repayments. Of that amount, $2.94 trillion, or 96 percent, was collected electronically. https://www.fms.treas.gov/aboutfms/i...ml#collections

[george]

I like the way you think. Examine this first redemption on USA soil:

hi David,

this link is 404 (broken, not found on server) if possible, would you re-upload it please?

thanks