Express trust

[David Merrill]

Giving a pledge or applying for a benefit to vote is a long way from signing a contract...

Shalom,
MJ

This has been tickling the back of my mind.

Here is the oath, properly formed like a bond:




But that was 2011. When SUTHERS was operating an evidence and seized money laundering operation - STATE OF COLORADO CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION in 2009 when I perfected billing and lien, he had a faulty oath to say the least:



Slick! He is swearing before the EVER-LIVING GOD. But the other actor on the bill for $10M each was the chief judge:



His oath is good, until a couple days after I published the lien.





I am running out of attachments so I will make my point the next post:

[David Merrill]

Continued

As a public official SAMELSON, if not SUTHERS too were drawing paychecks and even "legitimate" expenses from the Comptroller of the Currency. Right there in the state constitution it also stipulates good behaviors, regulations which include to conform to law of course.

Therefore this is the security agreement of the contract I am saying is expressly signed with an oath.

This explains what happened too. When I pushed for settlement by publishing my Notice of Lien in various BRICS (alternate SDR basket currency) nations SUTHERS dissolved the corporation, rather than settle up with me.











So John William SUTHERS with his ALL UPPER CASE GIBBERISH for an oath, everliving God or NOT was able to skirt around between public and private at his convenience and my expense. I should be able to draw on the Comptroller of the state or federal treasuries then, by comptroller warrant, for my $20M, in my opinion.

I think that upon careful consideration of the criminal syndicalism depriving me of property rights the US Supreme Court should order the Comptroller Warrant be issued.

[george]

I hope you find what you seek.

thats gotta be a record! the shortest post ever by MJ.

please forgive me MJ, i seem to have a reading comprehension disability among other ones and what I read into that post was probably something way different than what you *ment*
by it. hard to tell from this perspective but upon another read I see it could be different and not about intentional concealment of certain knowledge.

this forum of communication lends itself to mis takes and thats why I much prefer viva voce but it is what it is. still better than nothing.

what Ive been seeking is the truth but its getting tiresome and the thought has occurred that it is not to be found but created so maybe I *will* stop seeking truth and start seeking the way to create it from scratch. Im glad youre hopeful though.

will look up those 8 rules! and maybe find 9

also been reading old threads again, some for like the 5th time at least but each time they make more sense. I should probably just stick to doing that until I am able to put something together that is practicable. you guys have spent a lot of time here writing some great stuff and I think everything needed is probably here already somewhere. hard to resist bouncing thoughts around in here with y'all though. not many others of such caliber that I have access to do so with.


thats it for now. thanks

[David Merrill]

Thank you George;


I really love a post that gets me thinking.

I backup and save the site. A few days ago it took 850Mb of disk to do so. I regret that I do not find the time to read New Posts, much less browse around. But I must value it to take time to preserve it backed up like that.

[Michael Joseph]

thats gotta be a record! the shortest post ever by MJ.

please forgive me MJ, i seem to have a reading comprehension disability among other ones and what I read into that post was probably something way different than what you *ment*
by it. hard to tell from this perspective but upon another read I see it could be different and not about intentional concealment of certain knowledge.

this forum of communication lends itself to mis takes and thats why I much prefer viva voce but it is what it is. still better than nothing.

what Ive been seeking is the truth but its getting tiresome and the thought has occurred that it is not to be found but created so maybe I *will* stop seeking truth and start seeking the way to create it from scratch. Im glad youre hopeful though.

will look up those 8 rules! and maybe find 9

also been reading old threads again, some for like the 5th time at least but each time they make more sense. I should probably just stick to doing that until I am able to put something together that is practicable. you guys have spent a lot of time here writing some great stuff and I think everything needed is probably here already somewhere. hard to resist bouncing thoughts around in here with y'all though. not many others of such caliber that I have access to do so with.


thats it for now. thanks

No I meant it just the way it reads. I originally wrote I hope you find your inner genius but then I thought maybe you might take that the wrong way.

You might benefit greatly from Jose Silva's work. Each of us has so much potential but we just need to learn to use more of our brains. Seems like a weird statement until one actually can go to Alpha on demand. It can be learned and as far as I am concerned, it should be.

ment = mens = mind

I type about 120 words a minute so it is easy fou me to put together 10k words in little time. I read a paper years ago that said "we all get what we desire" that may sound contrary to you but it is true. We are commanded to wash the middle sub conscious mind to make her clean and present her as a virgin.

She is as a vineyard. Will she produce good grapes for you or bad grapes? Only you can know. For only you can wash her and make her clean.

Shalom
MJ

[David Merrill]

effect and cause/cause and effect

I believe there is a well-established tenet that fraud vitiates all contract (bond).

So if an official knowingly rejoinders or engages in fraud, subsequent to being properly bonded does impeachment bring even the previous acts from the office into question? Especially when we are speaking about "judges"? Is this not cause for any prisoners on mittimus and even prisoners who have finished sentence to call for review?

If one wants to get all OCDave why not bring this to into light of the chief judge, typically witnessing the oaths of office of the "judges" in the entire district. If he is a scoundrel does that impeach the entire district? In this case attached, the alleged chief judge is the same Kirk Stewart SAMELSON.

CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST - as I understand it is formed in several ways, but often it is done by the beneficiary interloping into the trust operations by behaving or taking inappropriately (misdeed) responsibilities properly attended to by the trustee. The result of the CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST is typically a suit by the trustee against the beneficiary.

Now it might occur to you as it is, just now with me how insidious the brain damage of the STRAWMAN REDEMPTION has been by destroying the path to a proper understanding for Americans, and others, of trust law. Even and maybe especially the attorneys do not understand the trust law. But now Mayor (508(c)(1)(A) church/corporation sole - CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS) John William SUTHERS and his (formerly District Attorney) chief prosecutor David A. GILBERT have shown that they pioneer the criminal syndicalism together. I showed you the 2005 era oath of SUTHERS above, in all upper case; along with GILBERT who I have been presuming pioneered it - but now we have a conspiracy. - Title 28 USC 286.





Edited: This is a major component of GILBERT's confession. The district court office and oath is good for six years according to the state constitution. Why in three, would he change it knowing he was vacating his office, if he did not intend to vacate the office?


What I was told is simply, The trustee sues the beneficiary all the time!

Is that not what is going on all over the place, in the courthouses? No wonder I can presume the perspective these courthouses are clearinghouses for settlement between the realm of lawful money US Treasury and the central bank, the Fed! The beneficiary of government is always taking it upon him or herself to self-govern and thus intelopes by running a STOP sign, again ALL UPPER CASE LETTERS:

[David Merrill]

Hi MJ;

The genius I admire in you is that you can admit how ignorant you are. I pay tribute to my ego as of yet.

Well the first step is to realize that how ignorant am I. Then Wisdom can come.

P.S. In hope that you have not taken that the wrong way...

[Michael Joseph]

Hi MJ;

The genius I admire in you is that you can admit how ignorant you are. I pay tribute to my ego as of yet.

P.S. In hope that you have not taken that the wrong way...

You don't upset me. In fact I am encouraged by the response - I have been using Jose Silva's work these days and it is awesome. My mom told me that I should "be careful" with such stuff, and I know she means well, but on the other hand she goes to a doctor and submits lock stock and barrel to every word the doctor utters.

It is amazing that we are born into these bodies and not one of us has any clue how it works. Sort of like the mirror image of State. These are mere fractals of each other. Nevertheless, we are informed that we are to "get knowledge" and one with knowledge opens his mouth to one without and the one without deems the other a pagan or other such non-sense. This of course is a fear response with chops at the foundational beliefs of the one thinking himself secure.

Nevertheless, let us "stretch the tent cords of the mind and thereby enlarge the tent." For just as Paul was so are we to be : "a tent maker". Where do you tabernacle with God? Hopefully within the "tent" of your Mind. For God is Spirit. And Christ is the Power and the Wisdom of God. Thusly Christ is formed in the creature. Just as Scripture declares.

Robert Stone's work is also amazing and here is another gem to put on the bookshelf : The Secret of the sub-conscious power within you Dr. Murphy was way ahead of his time.

While my intellect and reason brought me to the point of discover and questioning [start of path of awakening] - I continue to ask:

Son 1:6 Look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me: my mother's children were angry with me; they made me the keeper of the vineyards; but mine own vineyard have I not kept.

Son 1:7 Tell me, O thou whom my soul loveth, where thou feedest, where thou makest thy flock to rest at noon: for why should I be as one that turneth aside by the flocks of thy companions?

Son 1:8 If thou know not, O thou fairest among women, go thy way forth by the footsteps of the flock, and feed thy kids beside the shepherds' tents.


My mother made me the keeper of the vineyards [plural] but I never stopped to keep my own vineyard! So I now yearn O tell me where is the place of rest in God. So that I may be as Abel and keep the flocks [thoughts and desires of God] at noon [the time of Strength].

And the wonderful response is returned from the Divine upon me in verse 8. But now I am writing a commentary on the Song of Songs and what is developing is amazing.

Jer 12:10 Many pastors have destroyed my vineyard, they have trodden my portion under foot, they have made my pleasant portion a desolate wilderness.

Jer 12:11 They have made it desolate, and being desolate it mourneth unto me; the whole land is made desolate, because no man layeth it to heart.


As lady and I look out tonight from Desolation Row.

Shalom Brother,
MJ

[David Merrill]

I like to hear about opening (cleansing) the womb (matrix).

[Christopher Thomas]

When a trust indenture is executed...what is the opinion of the trustee stamping redeemed?

[Michael Joseph]

When a trust indenture is executed...what is the opinion of the trustee stamping redeemed?

Is the request or claim or demand of the beneficiary in accord with the bylaws of the trust? Can relief be granted without breach of trust? Of course the beneficiary must show a certificate of beneficial interest in order to get the trustee to perform. The trustee would be in breach of trust if benefits were distributed to a party not holding an office under the trust.

[Christopher Thomas]

perfected1.pdf

Well you see, One has accepted certain effects (stripped away from rightful owner)in exchange for it's benefits according to the structure of indenture...i'm wondering as competent trustee the duty of properly redeeming...is there anytime a signature should not be redeemed first?

[Christopher Thomas]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4630[/ATTACH]

Well you see, One has accepted certain effects (stripped away from rightful owner)in exchange for it's benefits according to the structure of indenture...i'm wondering as competent trustee the duty of properly redeeming...is there anytime a signature should not be redeemed first?

WAIT, no thought about it...it would be double minded of one to do that. with it being used to transfer the evil away why would I redeem a rotton apple from a basket of rotton apples? naw..no thank you...sometimes I think i overstudy and confuse with small questions...

[Chex]

I believe there is a well-established tenet that fraud vitiates all contract (bond). CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST - as I understand it is formed in several ways, but often it is done by the beneficiary interloping into the trust operations by behaving or taking inappropriately (misdeed) responsibilities properly attended to by the trustee. The result of the CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST is typically a suit by the trustee against the beneficiary. What I was told is simply, The trustee sues the beneficiary all the time!

Though about that too. Does one take a Suo moto or a pledge?

Those who are acting as 'public officials' for the U.S. Inc have donated their private property to a public use, they have joined a socialist collective and have became a partakes of stolen money people

[Christopher Thomas]

Though about that too. Does one take a Suo moto or a pledge?

Those who are acting as 'public officials' for the U.S. Inc have donated their private property to a public use, they have joined a socialist collective and have became a partakes of stolen money people

Chex, You're another well writer... Very enlightening.

My intent from the picture provided and per the trust indenture as trustee who was appointed to sign for the registered bonded claimed property then put it in TRUST in exchange for equity of trust back....

So I either reverse all interest in accordance with usufruct or bond individual equitable property and issue new to the individual beneficiary via usufruct.

I'm working hard to be competent....